Hi Pranav,
I left some comments on your design. Your doc discusses a bunch of
details about infrastructure such as testing frameworks, automation,
and performance databases, but doesn't describe how it will fit in
with our existing infrastructure (Load Tests, Nexmark, Jenkins,
InfluxDB, Grafina).
It turns out there was a commit submitted here!
https://github.com/nanhu-lab/beam/commit/d4f5fa4c41602b4696737929dd1bdd5ae2302a65
Related GH issue: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/23074
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:28 AM Sachin Agarwal wrote:
> I would posit that something is better than
Hello,
Hope this email finds you well. I have attached a link to a doc which
discusses the design for a performance and cost benchmarking framework to
be used by Beam IOs and Google-provided dataflow templates.
Please feel free to comment on the doc with any questions, concerns or
ideas you
This is your daily summary of Beam's current high priority issues that may need
attention.
See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/issue-priorities for the meaning and
expectations around issue priorities.
Unassigned P1 Issues:
https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/23350 [Bug]:
De : Luke Cwik
Date : jeudi, 8 septembre 2022 à 19:17
À : BALLADA Vincent
Cc : dev@beam.apache.org
Objet : Re: [JmsIO] => Pull Request to fix message acknowledgement issue
[vwP6KQExYeP8ewASUVORK5CYII=]
[EXT]
Could we have more than one active checkpoint per reader instance?
Yes. Readers
