Re: [QUESTION] Add Company logo

XQ Hu via dev wrote: >>> >>>> Please check this: >>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/website/ADD_LOGO.md >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 6:05 PM Ahmet Altay via dev < >>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: >>&

Re: Broken Beam Example

Filed an issue: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32552 Thank you for reporting! On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 3:05 PM Robert Bradshaw via dev wrote: > We should definitely make sure there's an issue for this--if this example > isn't running it's unlikely the others are as well. > > I'm not sure

Re: [QUESTION] Add Company logo

Hi Hope, Just checking: Were you able to add your logo to the website? Ahmet On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 4:50 PM Ahmet Altay wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for the message and consideration. > > There is no requirement beyond using Beam. Feel free to add it there. To > state the ob

Re:

Hi Ahijah -- Email did not have your question. Do you have a question? (moving dev list to bcc.) On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:57 PM Ahijah Koil Boaz Isacejayakumar via dev < dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > > > This message contains proprietary information from Equifax which may be > confidential. If

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Beam 2.59.0 Released

Congratulations! On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 3:40 PM Robert Burke wrote: > The Apache Beam Team is pleased to announce the release of version 2.59.0. > > You can download the release here: > > https://beam.apache.org/get-started/downloads/ > > This release includes bug fixes, features, and improveme

Re: Beam Summit Case Study

Hi Debasish, Raj! Thank you for reaching out! And Thank you for presenting at the summit! We would love to do a case study with you! I will connect you with the relevant folks, so that we can get started with a draft and once we have something ready for review we can bring it back here. Ahmet O

Re: [DISCUSS] Beam 3.0: Paving the Path to the Next Generation Data Processing Framework

It is excellent to have this discussion and excitement :) I admit I only glanced at the email threads. I apologize if I am repeating some existing ideas. I wanted to share my thoughts: - Focus on the future: Instead of going back to stuff we have not implemented, we can think about what the users

Re: Beam 2.58.0 Release Branch Cut

Thank you! On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 8:59 AM Jack McCluskey via dev wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I just cut the 2.58.0 release branch ( > https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/release-2.58.0) and will be working > on getting the release branch stabilized. > > There are currently two release blockers o

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: XQ Hu

Congratulations XQ! On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 9:17 AM Ahmed Abualsaud via dev wrote: > Congrats XQ! > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 3:17 AM Desire L wrote: > >> Congratulations XQ!🤓🤓 >> >> 2024. 6. 25. 오전 8:32, XQ Hu via dev 작성: >> >>  >> Thanks a lot! Happy to keep working with all of you! >> >> O

Re: [QUESTION] Add Company logo

Hi, Thank you for the message and consideration. There is no requirement beyond using Beam. Feel free to add it there. To state the obvious: please keep the description neutral (not advertisement like) and link to the main company page (without ads, special trackers etc.) In the future, we would

Re: University of Innsbruck - Apache Beam options

I sent you an invite for Slack. Welcome to the Beam community. On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 10:47 AM Pedratscher Stefan < stefan.pedratsc...@student.uibk.ac.at> wrote: > Dear Apache Beam Team, > > I am a student at the University of Innsbruck, currently using Apache > Beam for my research. > > I am usi

Re: Joining Apache Beam Slack

Sent an invite. Welcome to the Beam community! On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:00 PM Ben Warren wrote: > Hello Apache Beam team, > > I’m a startup founder using Apache Beam, and I’d like to stay up-to-date > with Apache Beam developments. Can I join the ASF Slack #beam channel? I > don’t have an @apac

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for 2.57.0 Release

Thank you Kenn! On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 8:00 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The next release (2.57.0) branch cut is scheduled on May 29th, 2024, > according to the release calendar [1]. > > I volunteer to perform this release. My plan is to cut the branch on that > date, and cherry

Re: Beam + Google Summer of Code 2024

Welcome! It is great to have new and returning contributors working on exciting projects! On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 9:35 AM Svetak Sundhar via dev wrote: > Welcome and welcome (back)! > > > Svetak Sundhar > > Data Engineer > s vetaksund...@google.com > > > > On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 2:06 AM Reeba Q

Re: Structured Logging in python

Is there an open github issue for this? Perhaps it would be a good project to implement in Python, using the java version as a reference implementation? On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:04 PM Udi Meiri wrote: > Hi, > > I believe this wasn't implemented for Python (only Java). You can try > adding stru

Re: 2.56.0 release

Thank you Danny! On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:20 AM Maciej Szwaja via dev wrote: > Hi, > > a nice round version number :) > > Cheers, > Maciej > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:56 PM Danny McCormick via dev < > dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > >> Hey everyone, >> >> On top of running the current 2.55.1 patc

Re: [Important] GSoC 2024 Project Ideas

Friendly reminder: Feb 3rd is the latest day to record GSoC 2024 project ideas. There are no Beam projects in the list at the moment. If you have an idea and you need help, please feel free to ask your questions here. On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:12 PM Ahmet Altay wrote: > Hi all! > >

Fwd: [Important] GSoC 2024 Project Ideas

Hi all! GSoC is a good opportunity to get new community members and a good opportunity for you to mentor junior folks. If you have any ideas please record them (https://s.apache.org/gsoc2024ideas) *by 3rd Feb*. As for some ideas, these are good opportunities for (i) some low hanging but low prior

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sam Whittle

Congratulations Sam! On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:42 AM Byron Ellis via dev wrote: > Congrats Sam! > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:32 AM Chamikara Jayalath via dev < > dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > >> Congrats Sam! >> >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 9:32 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Byron Ellis

Congratulations Byron! On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:35 AM Tomo Suzuki via dev wrote: > Congratulations! > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 1:33 PM Chamikara Jayalath via dev < > dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > >> Congrats Byron! >> >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 9:32 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: >> >>> Hi all,

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.51.0, release candidate #1

Thank you for the information. I agree with Kenn in that case. This could wait for the next release. Unless there is another reason to do the RC2. On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 12:30 PM Yi Hu wrote: > > Would it impact all python users including breaking the new user, quick >> start experience? Or wo

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.51.0, release candidate #1

Would it impact all python users including breaking the new user, quick start experience? Or would it impact users of a specific IO or configuration? If it is the former, I think it would be worth fixing it just to have a working new user experience. With new user experience I am thinking about som

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.51.0, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) - reviewed doc updates. On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 12:28 AM Jan Lukavský wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Tested Java SDK with Flink Runner on own test-cases. > > Jan > On 10/4/23 21:10, Bruno Volpato via dev wrote: > > +1 (non-binding). > > Tested with https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Alex Van Boxel

Congratulations Alex! Well deserved! On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:54 AM Ritesh Ghorse via dev wrote: > Congratulations Alex! > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:54 PM Danny McCormick via dev < > dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > >> Congrats Alex, this is well deserved! >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:50 PM Jac

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Valentyn Tymofieiev

Congratulations Valentyn! Well deserved! On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:54 AM Ritesh Ghorse via dev wrote: > Congratulations Valentyn! > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:53 PM Jack McCluskey via dev > wrote: > >> Congrats Valentyn! >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:40 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: >> >>> Hi all

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Robert Burke

Congratulations Robert! Well deserved! On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:54 AM Ritesh Ghorse via dev wrote: > Congratulations Robert! > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:52 PM Danny McCormick via dev < > dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > >> Congrats Robert, this is very well deserved! >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at

Re: Beam High Priority Issue Report (43)

Do people find these emails useful? It does not look like we are acting on these? Could we consider turning them off or finding a way to make those more useful (e.g. just list issues created/changed in th last week, or auto-downgrade to P2 after N month etc.) And this section "P1 Issues with no up

Re: Beam ML Use Cases - Google Summer of Code 2023

Thank you for your hard work and writing this Reeba! @Danielle Syse - could we please share this on Beam's social channels? On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 10:54 AM Danny McCormick via dev < dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for all your hard work this summer Reeba! I've really enjoyed > getting to

Re: Disabling Jenkins Jobs

Thank you for doing this. Is there a list of jobs that will be disabled? I am particularly curious about: website publishing job (which I need to use manually sometimes) and the job that publishes daily staging builds (which we share with users sometimes.) Thank you. Ahmet On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 a

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.50.0, release candidate #2

+1 (binding). I validated python quick starts on direct and dataflow runners. Thank you for working on the release! On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 8:48 AM Robert Burke wrote: > Good morning! > > RC2 validation and vote is still open! > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2023, 1:28 PM XQ Hu via dev wrote: > >> +1 >> R

Re: [Request for Feedback] Mechanism for "Beam Website Feedback"

Thank you XQ! For reference, responses are going to this spreadsheet [1] for now. We can set up an email trigger for that if people here think it would be useful. [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bvPFLgMamtYXiUULjx3JY-b1SB-voUqaj6o1UMqTgX4/edit?usp=sharing -- not shared by default, you

[ANNOUNCE] New committer: Ahmed Abualsaud

Hi all, Please join me and the rest of the Beam PMC in welcoming a new committer: Ahmed Abualsaud (ahmedabuals...@apache.org). Ahmed has been part of the Beam community since January 2022, working mostly on IO connectors, made a large amount of contributions to make Beam IOs more usable, performa

Re: Beam Website Feedback

Explicitly adding Jonas in case he is not subscribed to the dev list. On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 5:50 AM Kerry Donny-Clark via dev < dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Jonas. Can you please submit a quick PR to update the text? I'm > happy to review. > Kerry > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 10:03 PM Jona

Re: Mechanism for "Beam Website Feedback"

t) > is monitored. > I imagine we can convert it to an email. IIRC this was possible as a native feature of Google sheets, but if not we can use some other form -> email product. > > > > Svetak Sundhar > > Data Engineer > s vetaksund...@google.com > > >

Mechanism for "Beam Website Feedback"

Hi all, We regularly get emails with "Subject: Beam Website Feedback", they are filtered out before they reach this mailing list. I believe the reason for that is people have some feedback to share, but clicking the feedback will open the default email application and they will be surprised and cl

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Transform Service

Congratulations! This is a great usability improvement, lowering the bar for using multi language features. On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 3:48 PM Chamikara Jayalath via dev < dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > We recently added a Docker Compose based service named Transform Service > to Beam. >

Re: [VOTE] Vendored Dependency guava 32.1.2-jre Release

+1 - I checked the tests on the linked testing PR. Thank you! On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 12:02 PM Yi Hu via dev wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > Please review the release of the following artifacts that we vendor: > > > * beam-vendor-guava-32_1_2-jre > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade vended guava version

ps://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts > [2] https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/27801 > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:08 PM Ahmet Altay via dev > wrote: > >> Hi Hong, >> >> Thank you for reaching out and thank you for offering to help. If you can &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade vended guava version

Hi Hong, Thank you for reaching out and thank you for offering to help. If you can start the PR and do the testing, one of the committers could help with the process. Thank you! Ahmet On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 9:13 AM Hong Teoh wrote: > Hi all, > > The current version of guava that is vended in

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for 2.50.0 Release

Thank you! On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:57 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > Hooray! > > Thanks for volunteering > > Kenn > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:49 AM Robert Burke wrote: > >> Hey Beam community, >> >> The next release (2.50.0) branch cut is scheduled on August 9th, 2023, >> according to >> the

Re: Why there are no certifications for Apache Beam

Hi Abhishek, We recently launched a new Beam certificate. You can find more information here: https://beam.apache.org/get-started/resources/learning-resources/#getting-started-with-apache-beam-quest. As part of the launch we also have a code for completing the program for free (more info here: htt

Re: fastavro Cython fixes

It looks like the fastavro issue marked as fixed now. (/cc @Valentyn Tymofieiev - I saw him on that issue thread.) Work on https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/27526 is still actively ongoing. Thank you for reaching out. On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:19 PM Eddie Zhou wrote: > Hi folks, > > I see

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Beam 2.49.0 Released

Congratulations! Thanks to the release manager and all contributors! On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 8:54 AM Yi Hu via user wrote: > The Apache Beam Team is pleased to announce the release of version 2.49.0. > > You can download the release here: > > https://beam.apache.org/get-started/downloads/ (websi

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.49.0, release candidate #2

+1 (binding) Validated python quick start on direct runner. Thank you! On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 12:54 PM Svetak Sundhar via dev wrote: > +1 (Non-Binding) > > Python quickstart Dataflow runner. > > > Svetak Sundhar > > Data Engineer > s vetaksund...@google.com > > > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 5:

Re: Beam Infrastructure - GitHub ARC

Thank you Andrey! On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 8:02 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > Nice! > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 6:23 PM Andrey Devyatkin < > andrey.devyat...@akvelon.com> wrote: > >> Hi Beam community! >> >> >> >> We are glad to announce that we have implemented GitHub Actions Runner >> Controller.

Re: DRAFT - Apache Beam Board Report - June 2023

Thank you Kenn! Added a few items. On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 2:28 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > Hi all, > > The next Beam board report is due next Wednesday, June 14. Please help me > to draft it at https://s.apache.org/beam-draft-report-2023-06. > > Ideas: > > - highlights from CHANGES.md > - inte

Re: [Launch Announcement] Beam Quest

Ahmet Altay wrote: > Thank you Svetak! I would encourage everyone to try out, and get the > badges :) > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 7:03 AM Svetak Sundhar via user < > u...@beam.apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Beam Community, >> >> We're excited to laun

Re: [Launch Announcement] Beam Quest

As this was one of GCP's first OSS quests, there were many people > instrumental in making this possible. > > Thanks to: > -Danielle Syse > -Ajay Hemnani > -Joellen Saunders > -Grzegorz Wierzchows > -Ahmet Altay > -XQ Hu > -Jenny Palomino > -Svetak Sundhar > -Shunping Huang > > Thanks, > > > > Svetak Sundhar > > Data Engineer > s vetaksund...@google.com > >

Re: Client-Side Throttling in Apache Beam

Thank you. +1 to adding this to wiki. FYI - @Damon Douglas shared a related doc earlier for alternative ideas for Beam to prevent overloading external services. ( https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VZ9YphDO7kewBSz5oMXVPHWaib3S03Z6aZ66BhciB3E/edit?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-ItxMSG72EzfSwVedSz-Zeg

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.48.0 release candidate #2

+1 (binding) On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 2:01 PM Ritesh Ghorse via dev wrote: > Thanks Danny and Jack! Dataflow containers are up! > > Only PMC votes count but feel free to test your use cases and vote on this > thread! > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:26 AM Alexey Romanenko < > aromanenko@gmail.c

Re: Introducing beam.MLTransform

Thank you for writing this, Anand! I think this is a good way to leverage existing libraries and also a good usability improvement. On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:04 AM XQ Hu via dev wrote: > Agree with Danny. Thanks for writing this! > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:35 AM Danny McCormick via dev < >

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.47.0, release candidate #3

+1 (binding) - thank you for completing most of the validations on the validation sheet! On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 5:51 PM Anand Inguva via dev wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested python quick start guide on Dataflow runner with Python 3.11. > > Thanks, > Anand > > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 10:53 PM

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.47.0, release candidate #2

https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/26521 was a severe issue. Should we cherry pick the fix (https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/26503) and build an RC3? (/cc @Reuven Lax @John Casey ) On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:01 PM Jack McCluskey via dev wrote: > I have just now realized I didn't replace the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for 2.48.0 Release

thread about the vote of 2.47.0 release, just curious > to know what is beam's release cadence, is it monthly? > > > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 1:58 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > >> Excellent, thank you! >> >> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 7:21 AM Ahmet Altay via dev >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for 2.48.0 Release

Thank you Ritesh! On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 10:00 AM Ritesh Ghorse via dev wrote: > Hey everyone, > > The next release branch 2.48.0 cut is scheduled for May 17th, according to > the release calendar [1]. > > I would like to volunteer myself to do this release. I'll cut the branch > on the schedule

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Drop @Experimental annotations and concept from Beam

Thank you very much for doing this Kenn! On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 3:49 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/26490 > > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 10:42 AM Austin Bennett wrote: > >> great, thanks, @* Kenneth Knowles ! >> >> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 10:12 AM Kenneth Knowles w

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Damon Douglas

Congratulations Damon! On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 1:00 PM Robert Burke wrote: > Congratulations Damon!!! > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023, 12:52 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please join me and the rest of the Beam PMC in welcoming a new committer: >> Damon Douglas (damondoug...@apache.org)

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Anand Inguva

Congratulations Anand! On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:05 AM Kerry Donny-Clark via dev < dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > Great work Anand, this is well deserved. > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:35 AM Yi Hu via dev > wrote: > >> Congrats Anand! >> >> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 3:54 PM Danielle Syse via dev

Re: Beam Release DockerHub Group

Thank you for doing this! I try to stay engaged with the releases and would be happy to be kept on this list. At the same time I agree with Robert, release managers should take precedence over PMC members if we cannot get the number to 6. On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:32 AM Robert Bradshaw via dev <

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for 2.47.0 Release

gt; > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:22 PM Ahmet Altay wrote: > >> Sounds good. Thank you. And if you need help please reach out. >> >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 6:29 AM Jack McCluskey >> wrote: >> >>> We're making good progress on finding and fixing bugs

Re: [DISCUSS] @Experimental, @Internal, @Stable, etc annotations

ber of >>> APIs we've been reluctant to call stable (for example, Beam Schemas, >>> portability, metrics related APIs). These APIs have been around for a long >>> time and I don't see them changing so probably this is the right thing to >>> do. But I just wanted

Re: [DISCUSS] @Experimental, @Internal, @Stable, etc annotations

default" in a way that users know and are OK with, > then 1 is impossible. And so the only way to fix 2 is to just eliminate the > annotation approach entirely and go with language conventions. > +1 to eliminating @Experimental as a Beam level annotation. That is the simplest approach

Re: Python 3.11 support in Apache Beam

cpython-3-11-use-more-memory). I wonder if that will negatively impact us. If feasible, it would be useful to understand that as well. > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 8:04 PM Ahmet Altay wrote: > >> Thank you, this is great! >> >> Python 3.11 announcement had a claim about pe

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for 2.47.0 Release

> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 8:10 PM Ahmet Altay wrote: > >> Jack, how is the release coming along? >> >> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 12:23 PM Jack McCluskey via dev < >> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hey everyone, >>> >>> I need a PMC

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for 2.47.0 Release

Jack, how is the release coming along? On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 12:23 PM Jack McCluskey via dev wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I need a PMC member's help adding my pubkey to > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS as well as adding > PyPI user jrmccluskey to the maintainers of the Apach

Re: [DISCUSS] @Experimental, @Internal, @Stable, etc annotations

I agree with Alexey and Byron. 1. We do not have any concrete evidence of our users paying attention to any of those annotations. Experimental API that were in that state for a long while are good examples. A possible exception is a deprecated annotation. My preference would be to simplify annotati

Re: Python 3.11 support in Apache Beam

Thank you, this is great! Python 3.11 announcement had a claim about performance [1]: "CPython 3.11 is an average of 25% faster than CPython 3.10 as measured with the pyperformance benchmark suite, when compiled with GCC on Ubuntu Linux. Depending on your workload, the overall speedup could be 10

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for 2.47.0 Release

Thank you Jack! On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 8:39 AM Jack McCluskey via dev wrote: > Hey all, > > The next (2.47.0) release branch cut is scheduled for April 5th, 2023, > according to > the release calendar [1]. > > I will be performing this release. My plan is to cut the branch on that > date, and c

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.46.0, release candidate #1

h next steps when we know more. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Danny >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 1:02 PM Anand Inguva >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Danny!! >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 12:14 PM Danny McCormick v

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.46.0, release candidate #1

>>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> Validated Go SDK quickstart on direct and dataflow runner >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:54 AM Alexey Romanenko < >>>>> aromanenko@gmail

Re: GSOC

Adenwala wrote: > I just need more favour from you sir that i wanted to participate in GSOC > by completing a project by Apache beam so sir can you guide me in that ? > And can become my mentor. > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2023, 10:09 PM Ahmet Altay wrote: > >> Hi Saifuddin,

Re: [Bug]: The item "Contact Us" displayed is in the Resources block of the footer #22695

Hi Saifuddin, It is here: https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/master/website - It is built using Hugo, and README.md has more information for building the website. Thank you for the bug report and the contribution. Feel free to reach out with questions. Ahmet On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 8:37 AM Saif

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.46.0, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) - I validated python quickstarts on direct & dataflow runners. Thank you for doing the release! On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 8:01 AM Chamikara Jayalath via dev < dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Validated multi-language Java and Python pipelines. > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 1

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Jan Lukavský

Congratulations Jan! On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 4:52 AM Jan Lukavský wrote: > Thanks everyone! > > This is great honor, I'm grateful for the support of the Apache Beam > community. > > Best, > > Jan > On 2/17/23 11:15, Shivam Singhal wrote: > > Congratulations Jan! > > On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 at 14:26

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.45.0, Release Candidate #1

+1 (binding) - I validated python quick starts on direct runner and python streaming quickstart on dataflow. Thank you! On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 5:17 AM Bruno Volpato via dev wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested with https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/DataflowTemplates (Java > SDK 11, Datafl

Re: Beam Release 2.46

Thank you Danny! On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 6:46 AM Danny McCormick via dev wrote: > Hey everyone, I would like to volunteer myself to do the 2.46.0 release. > > I will cut the branch Feb 22 [1], and cherrypick any blocking fixes > afterwards. Please review the current release blockers [2] and remov

Re: Community event cooperation

which is doable. > > Regards, > > Hui Zeng | Community Manager > M: +86 18819063834 <+86%20188%201906%203834> > > Apache DolphinScheduler Committer > zeng...@apache.org > https://twitter.com/Niko_Zeng > > > Ahmet Altay 于2023年2月9日周四 11:53写道： > >> Hi!

Re: Community event cooperation

ommunity Manager > M: +86 18819063834 <+86%20188%201906%203834> > > Apache DolphinScheduler Committer > zeng...@apache.org > https://twitter.com/Niko_Zeng > > > Ahmet Altay via dev 于2022年8月9日周二 07:03写道： > >> Hi Niko, >> >> Thank you for reaching out. We

Re: Incorrect python bigquery storage read API docs

Adding @Pablo Estrada who reviewed that issue, hopefully he could help. On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 4:37 PM Parth Doshi wrote: > Hi, > > I was reading through the documentation for the python bigquery read API > > and

Re: Beam Website Feedback

Adding @John Casey @Bruno Volpato - who might be able to point to relevant docs. On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 11:59 AM Shlomi Elbaz wrote: > Hello All, > > > > We developed a service with Apache Beam where we read an Avro file that > locate in GCP bucket, > > We had a load and benchmark tests, durin

Re: [Peer Review] Pull Request Eliminate Finalize in Read

Thank you for reaching out. Adding @Yi Hu for his input. It looks like Yi was reviewing the PR back in December. On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 1:52 AM Dejan Spasic wrote: > Hello team, > > I posted a pull request[0] some time ago where I (we) need your support. > In general, it is about the eliminati

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.44.0, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) - my concerns are addressed. On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:44 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev wrote: > +1. I validated that Dataflow and Beam Python containers include necessary > dependencies of Apache Beam and did additional validation (see inline). > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.44.0, release candidate #1

I validated python quick starts (direct, dataflow) X (batch, streaming). I ran into an issue with the dataflow batch case, running the wordcount with the standard: python -m apache_beam.examples.wordcount \ --output \ --staging_location \ --temp_location \ --runner DataflowRunner \ --job_name wo

Re: Beam Website Feedback

> [2] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/24747 > > [3] > https://github.com/apache/beam/pulls?page=1&q=is%3Apr+author%3Abullet03+is%3Aclosed+merged%3A%3E%3D2022-07-01 > > > > *From: *Ahmet Altay > *Date: *Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 2:22 PM > *To: *Alex Ko

Re: Beam Website Feedback

in the PRs or list. > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/24635 > > [2] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/24744 > > [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/1 > > [4] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/24747 > > > > Thank you, > > Alex &g

Fwd: Beam Java SDK - ReadableState.read() shouldn't it be Nullable?

Forwarding, because this message got lost in the list moderation. -- Forwarded message -- From: Jeeno Lentin To: dev@beam.apache.org Cc: Bcc: Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:36:55 -0500 Subject: Beam Java SDK - ReadableState.read() shouldn't it be Nullable? Hi, We use the Beam Java SDK

Fwd: MODERATE for dev@beam.apache.org

Forwarding, because this message got lost in the list moderation. -- Forwarded message -- From: bharataamer...@icloud.com To: dev@beam.apache.org Cc: Bcc: Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 13:36:09 +0530 Subject: Wanna contribute to this project guide where to start Hi, I am new to this proj

Re: Beam Website Feedback

ullet03> on the Beam ticket, who was able to help. > Makes sense. Thank you Rebecca. > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 5:06 PM Ahmet Altay wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 1:12 PM Ahmet Altay wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: Beam Website Feedback

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 1:12 PM Ahmet Altay wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 9:14 AM Alexey Romanenko > wrote: > >> Thanks Ahmet! I’d prefer to fix the links as you did and add the redirect >> from old one - perhaps, there are other similar links that have been

Re: Beam Website Feedback

ker again. > > — > Alexey > > > > On 20 Dec 2022, at 18:04, Ahmet Altay via dev wrote: > > I did a search and found a few places with the broken link. Correct links > should be: > https://beam.apache.org/get-started/resources/videos-and-podcasts/ > > I created

Re: Beam Website Feedback

I did a search and found a few places with the broken link. Correct links should be: https://beam.apache.org/get-started/resources/videos-and-podcasts/ I created a PR to update the website ( https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/24733). I do not know if that is the best solution. As an alternative w

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for Apache Beam 2.44.0 Release

wrote: > I managed to acquire covid for my last work week before vacation, so I > don't expect to make a lot of progress. I'm not sure the best way to hand > off release processes. > > Kenn > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 5:30 PM Ahmet Altay via dev > wrote: > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for Apache Beam 2.44.0 Release

e correct milestone for the 2.44.0 release should be this one: >>> https://github.com/apache/beam/milestone/7 >>> >>> - Cham >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 9:12 AM Ahmet Altay via dev >>> wrote: >>> >>>

Re: A Declarative API for Apache Beam

+1 to both of these proposals. In the past 12 months I have heard of at least 3 YAML implementations built on top of Beam in large production systems. Unfortunately, none of those were open sourced. Having these out of the box would be great, and it will clearly have used demand. Thank you all! On

Re: [Proposal] | Move FileIO and TextIO from :sdks:java:core to :sdks:java:io:file

I agree with Sachin. Keeping components that users will have to bring together anyway leads to a better user experience. Counter example to that is GCP libraries in my opinion. It was a frequent struggle for users to find a working set of libraries until there was a BOM. And even after the BOM it i

Re: [PROPOSAL] Preparing for Apache Beam 2.43.0 Release

Thank you Kenn! :) On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 12:45 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > Hi all, > > The 2.44.0 release cut is scheduled for Nov 30th [1]. I'd like to > volunteer to do this release. > > As usual, my plan would be to cut right on that date and cherry > pick critical fixes. > > Help me and th

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.43.0, release candidate #2

+1 (binding). - I validated the python quick starts on direct runner. Thank you! On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 9:51 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 3:52 PM Chamikara Jayalath via dev > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote o

Re: [Announce] Release tasks available through GitHub Actions workflows

Thank you, that is excellent. Adding the last few release manager, they would have the most applicable feedback: @Kiley Sok @Robert Burke @Chamikara Jayalath On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 1:17 PM Fer Morales Martinez < fernando.mora...@wizeline.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > We would like to share wi

Re: bhulette stepping back (for now)

Thank you for everything Brian! On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 11:27 AM Austin Bennett wrote: > Thanks for everything you've done, @bhule...@apache.org! > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 11:01 AM Pablo Estrada via dev < > dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > >> I promised I wouldn't cry so I won't. Cya! >> >> On Fr

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Yi Hu

Congratulations Yi! On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 1:57 PM Chamikara Jayalath via dev < dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > Contrats Yi! > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 10:48 AM Kerry Donny-Clark via dev < > dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > >> Great job Yi! I am happy to see your contributions recognized. >> >> On T

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >