>
> At the end of the day, it comes down to two questions:
>
> 1) Are there technical and project direction discussions happening off
> list and not reflected back to the list?
>
> 2) If yes, are the concrete decisions being made as a result of the off
> list discussions?
> From an Apache
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for raising this. I think I was a major contributor to your
frustration with the process by suggesting big changes to your IO PR.
As others have said, ideally that process should have gone differently: 1)
we should have had documentation on the best practices in developing IOs,
At the end of the day, it comes down to two questions:
1) Are there technical and project direction discussions happening off list and
not reflected back to the list?
2) If yes, are the concrete decisions being made as a result of the off list
discussions?
The answer to #1 is a definite yes.
Great summary Davor,
+1 with what you said.
Regards
JB
On 10/06/2016 08:29 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote:
Daniel, so glad you are starting to contribute to Beam! It was great
talking with you in person back in May. Welcome!
--
There are lots of different things mentioned here; I'll try to address
Yes, but as said in another e-mail, even if it's a step forward, an
argued and valuable proposal message is better IMHO.
Regards
JB
On 10/06/2016 08:16 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Oct 6, 2016, at 2:33 AM, Dan Halperin wrote:
Anyway, I don’t really understand why
Hi Dan,
Even if enable the "full" Github integration is a step forward, I'm not
sure it will help at the end.
I'm afraid we (at least most of us ;)) won't read pull request comments
on the mailing list because it would be way more verbose.
So, I think there's more value to quickly explain
Daniel, so glad you are starting to contribute to Beam! It was great
talking with you in person back in May. Welcome!
--
There are lots of different things mentioned here; I'll try to address them
separately.
The first use of AutoValue should have been discussed on the dev@ mailing
list. I
> On Oct 6, 2016, at 2:33 AM, Dan Halperin wrote:
>
> Anyway, I don’t really understand why the full github integration wasn’t
>> setup for the beam PR’s so that the comments would come back to the lists
>> as well (and JIRA, BTW).
>>
>
> This part confuses me.
How about sending just the notifications for creating new JIRA and opening
PR to dev@ so that those that are interested can start watching?
Thanks,
Thomas
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Dan Halperin
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Daniel Kulp
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> I just want to give a little more context to this…. I’ve been lurking on
> this list for several months now reading everything that’s going on. From
> Apache’s standpoint, that should be a “very good start” for getting to
I just want to give a little more context to this…. I’ve been lurking on this
list for several months now reading everything that’s going on. From Apache’s
standpoint, that should be a “very good start” for getting to know what is
happening in a project.
On my last PR, Eugene commented
This is a great idea. And it produces many easy starter tickets! :-)
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:51 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I would like to excuse myself to have forgotten to discuss and share with
> you a technical point and generally speaking do a small
+1 for AutoValue.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> So, any comment happening on a GitHub pull request, or discussion on
> hangouts which can impact the project (generally speaking) has to happen on
> the mailing list.
>
> It provides project
+1 for the notice
+1 for the usage of AutoValue
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I would like to excuse myself to have forgotten to discuss and share with
> you a technical point and generally speaking do a small reminder.
>
> When we
14 matches
Mail list logo