Re: Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating

2016-12-13 Thread Neelesh Salian
+1 to Davor and JB's point. The incubator stuff can certainly be done thoroughly after the board's decision (if in favor). Graduation aside, keeping up the cadence of the release would be better in the product life cycle. Perhaps a different thread altogether but I wanted to suggest if we can

Re: Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating

2016-12-13 Thread Davor Bonaci
I'd suggest to proceed with 0.4.0-incubating (as JB previously planned). My reasoning: I don't think we'll be able to release a non-incubating release next week, regardless of the Board's graduation decision. I think it will take a while (more details to follow on a separate thread). On the other

Re: Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating

2016-12-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, Either way is fine for me too. We discussed about the release schedule independently from the graduation process, that's why 0.4.0-incubator was planned around today. Regards JB On 12/13/2016 06:02 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: Hate to suggest this…. Assuming the Board OK’s the graduation

Re: Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating

2016-12-13 Thread Dan Halperin
Update: we think we've knocked off all the 0.4.0-incubating blockers, including postponing some. JB is going to start the release process soon! On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Very good point Frances. > > Definitely something we have to do. > >

Re: Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating

2016-12-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Very good point Frances. Definitely something we have to do. Regards JB On 12/04/2016 07:38 AM, Frances Perry wrote: Sounds great, JB! The major blocker in my opinion is to finish the polishing pass on the quickstarts and example archetypes, so that users will have a great experience trying