Re: Unable to clone beam site

2016-12-01 Thread Sandeep Deshmukh
rks fine for me: > > git clone https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site.git > > I have the warning, then go into the the incubator-beam-site folder and do: > > git checkout asf-site > > Regards > JB > > On 12/01/2016 10:14 AM, Sandeep Deshmukh wrote: > >

Unable to clone beam site

2016-12-01 Thread Sandeep Deshmukh
Hi, I am trying to clone beam site but getting following error: git clone https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site.git Cloning into 'incubator-beam-site'... remote: Counting objects: 10184, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (116/116), done. remote: Total 10184 (delta 60), reused 0

Re: Including Apex runner in Beam tutorial at Strata - Singapore

2016-11-15 Thread Sandeep Deshmukh
finitely do a demo using the Apex runner. It's what > Dan > > > and > > > > I are also planning during ApacheCon this week: same Wordcount > example > > > > running on different execution engines. > > > > > > > > Maybe this blog could help you to pr

Re: Including Apex runner in Beam tutorial at Strata - Singapore

2016-11-15 Thread Sandeep Deshmukh
a PR to "merge" those blog to Beam website. > > Regards > JB > > On 11/15/2016 04:00 PM, Sandeep Deshmukh wrote: > >> Dear Beam Community, >> >> There is a Beam tutorial in Strata-Singapore. I would like to explore >> possibility of including

Including Apex runner in Beam tutorial at Strata - Singapore

2016-11-15 Thread Sandeep Deshmukh
Dear Beam Community, There is a Beam tutorial in Strata-Singapore. I would like to explore possibility of including the Apex runner as a part of that tutorial. As Apex runner is recently merged into master branch of Beam, it would be of interest to many people. Please let us know if we can do

Re: Apache Beam logo proposal

2016-02-21 Thread Sandeep Deshmukh
The logo is really cool. +1 on idea of using small variant of colorful logo. Regards, Sandeep On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 4:29 AM, James Malone < jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thanks for the feedback! > > It sounds like their is positive consensus around the logo. As a