The logo is really cool. +1 on idea of using small variant of colorful logo.
Regards, Sandeep On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 4:29 AM, James Malone < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thanks for the feedback! > > It sounds like their is positive consensus around the logo. As a next step, > I am working on getting the original design files and will make them > available to the project. ETA is probably next week at this point. > > Cheers! > > James > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The colorful logo looks really nice. The condensed logo is OK in my > > opinion. I wonder if we could use a small variant of the colorful logo > > instead? > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Amazing job! > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Stephan Ewen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> I like it, too :-) > > >> > > >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi James, > > >>> > > >>> and thanks, > > >>> > > >>> I like it ! > > >>> > > >>> Regards > > >>> JB > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 02/18/2016 04:38 PM, James Malone wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Absolutely! > > >>>> > > >>>> Here is a link to the full proposed logo > > >>>> < > > >>>> > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-IhJZh9Ab52MmlkWHk2bWQ3bW8/view?usp=sharing > > >>>> >. > > >>>> Here is the proposed condensed (icon) logo > > >>>> < > > >>>> > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-IhJZh9Ab52cGEycG16T1UwS2M/view?usp=sharing > > >>>> > > > >>>> . > > >>>> > > >>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > [email protected]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi James, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> it's not possible to send attachment on the Apache mailing list. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Can you share the logo proposal on gist, google drive, or a HTTP > > server ? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>> Regards > > >>>>> JB > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 02/18/2016 08:46 AM, James Malone wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hello everyone, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> We're at the point where I think Beam needs a logo. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Originally, the name Beam was proposed to mix Batch + strEAM into > > one > > >>>>>> name (hence Beam). A designer, Stephanie Smythies, graciously > > dedicated > > >>>>>> some of her time to create a logo concept for the project. I > wanted > > to > > >>>>>> share that design and propose we adopt it as the logo (and design) > > for > > >>>>>> the project. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> This logo is a 'B' which ties closely to the project name, the > > concept > > >>>>>> of light beams, and the merge of patch and streaming (via the > > lights in > > >>>>>> the 'B'). Moreover, it is colorful, bright, and fresh (imho, of > > course.) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> For a smaller logo (site icons and such) we can use the following: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> What does everyone think? If this logo looks good, I also propose > we > > >>>>>> redesign the current Beam site and materials to match the design, > > >>>>>> colors, and typeface. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Cheers! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> James > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > >>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > > >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > >>> [email protected] > > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > >>> > > >
