PortableApps.com has FireFox 3 in a portable version, which runs from a thumb
drive/USB Stick. With Zotero, this is ideal for students (and we tightwads)
who do research on other's machines.
Sadly, the portable version of OO is old ...
--Gannon
--- On Sat, 6/28/08, Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL
Bruce,
I'm very involved with another project at the momment
(http://www.RUSTPrivacy.org/) so I don't think I'd be much help with
maintenance.
I do have some questions about the translators ...
- have generic translators been made for the common OO output formats
(HTML,XHTML,DocBook etc.) ?
Simple is good :)
I came up with a bit different solution, but the result is the same ...
The 'biblio' table is actually selectable (there is a drop down box).
Whichever table is selected last is used to populate the attributes of
the text:bibliography-mark node. You can select either a
1. The Bibliography Table (a list/format control which collates
'Bibliography Entry' marks) is broken. I didn't see this on the list
of deficiencies, but I might have missed it. In any case I wrote it up
and the problem probably should be fixed, not because the current
Bibliography facility is
--- Leonard Mada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gannon Dick wrote:
My favorite:
http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/coding/citationtags.htm
I missed this one, too. There is even more interesting information,
e.g.
the Journal Tag Library explained, see:
http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag
by the application
language option, and overrides the content in the ODF 'meta.xml'
source. There is a default(German) in my download of 2.1; easy enough
to change but I feel like I was not warned.
--Gannon
--- Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 28, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Gannon Dick wrote:
As I
Not all meta data systems use the URL's and PURL's
(http://www.purl.org) system for element resolution like the Dublin
Core. This makes it hard to search (backward) for equivilents.
It occured to me that this happens because of how you set up the
problem, but with a different sort of resolver
--- Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh please; don't shoot the messenger. I'm just telling you a) you're
not being clear, and b) the scope of these discussions are typically
not for this list, but rather for the OASIS lists.
From my viewpoint (and point of view) information I need
a) ODF is authored in RELAX NG, which has far more power to validate
this sort of stuff than XSD.
The Dublin Core is authored in XSD or RDF, and both namespaces are
controlled by the W3C. I don't want to produce RELAX NG schema for
Dublin Core as a prerequsite for further work. I assume in
I have XSD schemas for ODF 1.0, but limited to two namespaces (meta and
settings). The problem of course is that all 27 namespaces would need
definition. So, I write flat ODF with an identity transform filter
then reduce that to //office:document/office:meta or
//office:document/office:settings.
I feel their pain, however. A schema utility for the native DB would
make them feel much better about leaving out the test data I think.
--Gannon
--- Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 23, 2006, at 1:18 PM, Andre Schnabel wrote:
There is really no need to rand a prefilled
--- Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/22/06, Gannon Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to prioritize RDF elements or are they all peers?
In RDF, you just have subject-predicate-object statements. So they
are
indeed all peers.
The way to encourage certain expectations
.
It doesn't sound hard to do, although the programming is past my
abilities. The same is done now (Save:Yes or No) although not in the
context of Meta Data.
--Gannon
--- David Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 23 October 2006 7:38 am, Gannon Dick wrote:
You do start to lose me just
13 matches
Mail list logo
