Re: [dev-biblio] Re: Re: Bibliographic Issues should be added to the marketing strategy

2006-06-14 Thread Bruce D'Arcus


On Jun 14, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:

That's nice, except that unless you will be done (who will implement 
new ODF
citation support in OOo?), you will have no useable bibliographic 
support
in OpenOffice.org, no users, and no push on Sun to do something about 
it.


Right; chicken-and-egg.

Clearly someone at Sun, and/or a non-Sun person with serious C++ skills 
(like CPH) needs to do it.


However, "it" can mean different things. It could mean that Sun 
developers, for example, improve the generic infrastructure 
(particularly around fields) so that it is easier for outsiders to then 
implement the specific code (in this case citations).  Indeed, there 
has been private discussions about just this with people at Sun, going 
back at least a year, if not two. No resolution though (and no news in 
fact).


As it is, CPH started implementing the citation improvements without 
that enhanced generic support, but got tied up with other (paid) work. 
Such is life in open source land.


And then, of ocurse, we had a Google SOC application ready to implement 
it, but nobody outside this project voted for it.


On the brighter side, as soon as we get that and the API implemented, I 
think things will pick up significantly. But it seems that's sort of a 
big initial hill to climb.


I'm sorry, but I feel strongly about this: there is no other reasonable 
way. The low-level design is just wrong, and it has to be redone.


To understand what it might mean from a user perspective, go try out 
the latest beta of Word 2007. Notwithstanding some of problems I've 
noted on the blog, it has a level of integrated elegance that goes far 
beyond what is possible with the current OOo code. Want to add a 
bibliography? Just select your style from a pull-down list; it's 
automatically added. Want to change the citation style? Just select 
from another list and everything is reformatted in real-time.


It's not that this stuff is rocket science, and that MS is somehow 
brilliant. They took the same approach we have been planning. It's just 
that some executive or manager somewhere at MS just said "let's 
prioritize higher ed in the next release" and people made it happen.


Bruce

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[dev-biblio] Re: Re: Bibliographic Issues should be added to the marketing strategy

2006-06-14 Thread Matej Cepl
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> My opinion for quite awhile has been that Plan B needs to be exactly
> what we are doing: starting by implementing the new ODF citation
> support, hooking up citeproc to it, and exposing an API.* Without that,
> we will make no progress. Or at least, that's my position; I'd rather
> use Word.

That's nice, except that unless you will be done (who will implement new ODF
citation support in OOo?), you will have no useable bibliographic support
in OpenOffice.org, no users, and no push on Sun to do something about it. I
will rather stay with LyX.

Matej

-- 
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB  25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23 Marion St. #3, (617) 876-1259, ICQ 132822213
 
In those days spirits were brave, the stakes were high, men were
real men, women were real women and small furry creatures from
Alpha Centauri were real small furry creatures from Alpha
Centauri.
-- Douglas Adams

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]