On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, at 02:03 PM, Olemis Lang wrote:
> On 12/17/17, Gary wrote:
> >
> [...]
> >
> > On the subject of github contributions, I believe we will still need to
> > maintain the requirement for ICLAs, at least for significant
> > contributions.
> >
> [...]
>
>
On 12/17/17, Gary wrote:
>
[...]
>
> On the subject of github contributions, I believe we will still need to
> maintain the requirement for ICLAs, at least for significant
> contributions.
>
[...]
+1 ... the main reason (beyond obvious decentralization), in my
opinion,
Olemis does have a point.
To avoid derailing this discussion, we could limit this proposal to the
principal of moving to gitbox. This leaves us with either migrating the
existing repo to gitbox or creating a new one if the old code is not
required. The github presence is not expect to be
Hello John
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 5:22 PM, John Chambers wrote:
> Hi Olemis,
>
> My proposal was to start with a clean git repository that will only contain
> code related to the version of Bloodhound based on the Django platform. The
> main reason for this is to ensure it
On 12/16/17, Gary wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, at 09:00 PM, Olemis Lang wrote:
>> On 12/16/17, John Chambers wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> [...]
>> >
>> > I think using git and gitbox/github for our version control will make
>> > contributing to the
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, at 09:00 PM, Olemis Lang wrote:
> On 12/16/17, John Chambers wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> [...]
> >
> > I think using git and gitbox/github for our version control will make
> > contributing to the project much easier.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
>
> There
On 12/16/17, John Chambers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
[...]
>
> I think using git and gitbox/github for our version control will make
> contributing to the project much easier.
>
> What do you think?
>
There is a git mirror in github [1]_ . FWIW , I'd recommend github .
.. [1]
This sounds like a great idea! I suspect that these days there is a
larger potential contributor base who would be used to git rather than
Apache Subversion.
Cheers,
Gary
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, at 07:17 PM, John Chambers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If we are going to rebuild Bloodhound on top of