Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github

We could have a VOTE. But, I think there iff there is no concern or main objection from DISCUSS thread, we could move to Github via Gtibox without VOTE. Once done, we just need to do official ANNOUNCE to make sure dev@ at bookkeeper and dost-log knows about the changes and what to expect. I am

git/github commit hooks

Last thursday, we a had a short discussion about possibly changing the merge process to allow unsquashed commits and the use of the github merge button. One sticking point is that we'd like an automatic way to enforce some commit message metadata requirements and formatting. Git lets you define

Re: Cookies and empty disks

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote: > Can we have a doc to put all these things? Thread has grown enough to cause > confusion. I created a github project earlier today. We can manage the different streams of work from there. Each stream should have a

Re: Cookies and empty disks

I like this too. I have no time immediately for working on this sorry. Maybe the only blocker isse is about the boot with empty dirs which Sijie pointed Enrico Il lun 9 ott 2017, 19:08 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > +1. I liked this summary. > > JV, is this related to what you

Re: [VOTE] Move completely to github

+1 On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:08 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > We discussed this in > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bookkeeper-dev/201710.mbox/ajax/% > >

Re: [VOTE] Move completely to github

+1 On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > Hi folks, > > We discussed this in > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bookkeeper-dev/201710.mbox/ajax/% > 3CCAO2yDyarL1%2Bf7AWB89NfUH3Ji35RZVaR-CmLYV16i-1RW%2BA8Lg%40mail. > gmail.com%3E > > But we never formally

Re: [VOTE] Move completely to github

+1 On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > My vote is a +1 > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > > I forgot the timeframe. The deadline to vote is midday UTC, on > > Thursday 12th October. > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at

Re: Cookies and empty disks

Can we have a doc to put all these things? Thread has grown enough to cause confusion. Immediate things. 1. Don't assume new bookie if journal dir is empty. 2. Put cookies through bookie format, and bookie never boots on an empty cookie or mismatched cookie. 3. We can live with operations

Re: Cookies and empty disks

On Oct 9, 2017 1:54 AM, "Ivan Kelly" wrote: Hi folks, I was travelling over the weekend, so I didn't have a chance to reply to anything on this thread. First off, as Enrico said, there's a lot of different topics being discussed at once. Perhaps each should be broken into a

Re: Cookies and empty disks

On Oct 9, 2017 1:13 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" wrote: 2017-10-09 9:21 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo : > okay, but why do you want to track the list of files? I don't get your idea > here. > If you allow a bookie to start with a journal directory which contains the

Re: Cookies and empty disks

>> In any case, why not instead of refusing to start if any ledgers >> reference the bookie, on boot the bookie checks which ledgers it is >> supposed to have, > > How can you do this without querying the big oracle? You can use the local > view as source of truth. Maybe I am missing one piece

Re: Cookies and empty disks

Il lun 9 ott 2017, 10:54 Ivan Kelly ha scritto: > Hi folks, > > I was travelling over the weekend, so I didn't have a chance to reply > to anything on this thread. First off, as Enrico said, there's a lot > of different topics being discussed at once. Perhaps each should be >

Re: [VOTE] Move completely to github

My vote is a +1 On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > I forgot the timeframe. The deadline to vote is midday UTC, on > Thursday 12th October. > > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> We discussed this in >>

Re: [VOTE] Move completely to github

I forgot the timeframe. The deadline to vote is midday UTC, on Thursday 12th October. On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > Hi folks, > > We discussed this in >

Re: [VOTE] Move completely to github

+1 -- Enrico 2017-10-09 11:16 GMT+02:00 Ivan Kelly : > Hi folks, > > We discussed this in > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bookkeeper-dev/201710.mbox/ajax/% > 3CCAO2yDyarL1%2Bf7AWB89NfUH3Ji35RZVaR-CmLYV16i-1RW%2BA8Lg%40mail. > gmail.com%3E > > But we never formally

[VOTE] Move completely to github

Hi folks, We discussed this in http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bookkeeper-dev/201710.mbox/ajax/%3CCAO2yDyarL1%2Bf7AWB89NfUH3Ji35RZVaR-CmLYV16i-1RW%2BA8Lg%40mail.gmail.com%3E But we never formally called a vote, so here's the vote. The bylaws don't actually cover votes like this, so

Re: BookKeeper web ui

On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Do you have plans for creating a web ui? AFAIK, there are no plans for a web ui. The http stuff is to allow a thin client, and nothing else. I could be wrong though. -Ivan

Re: Cookies and empty disks

Hi folks, I was travelling over the weekend, so I didn't have a chance to reply to anything on this thread. First off, as Enrico said, there's a lot of different topics being discussed at once. Perhaps each should be broken into a github issue, and then we can continue each conversation there, as

Re: Cookies and empty disks

2017-10-09 9:21 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo : > okay, but why do you want to track the list of files? I don't get your idea > here. > If you allow a bookie to start with a journal directory which contains the cookie file but without the other files the bookie thinks that have been

Re: Cookies and empty disks

okay, but why do you want to track the list of files? I don't get your idea here. - Sijie On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > 2017-10-09 7:52 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo : > > > On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Enrico Olivelli

Re: Cookies and empty disks

2017-10-09 7:52 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo : > On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Il sab 7 ott 2017, 00:27 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > > > > Enrico, > > > > > > Let's try to come to a conclusion or an agreement what