[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14968656#comment-14968656
]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-867:
--
the failed tests aren't related to this patch. the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14964804#comment-14964804
]
Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-867:
--
Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-867
Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14965224#comment-14965224
]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-867:
--
I ran the test-patch locally. it seems to pass the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14962079#comment-14962079
]
Venkateswararao Jujjuri commented on BOOKKEEPER-867:
Adding two more patches one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14962087#comment-14962087
]
Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-867:
--
Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-867
Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14961619#comment-14961619
]
Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-867:
--
Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-867
Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960128#comment-14960128
]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-867:
--
[~jujjuri] could you generate the patch with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960130#comment-14960130
]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-867:
--
the patch looks good to me. +1
> New Client API to allow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960157#comment-14960157
]
Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-867:
--
Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-867
Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14960181#comment-14960181
]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-867:
--
[~jujjuri] there are 23 javadoc warnings and 2 findbugs
Thanks Sijie.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Sijie Guo (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14733882#comment-14733882
> ]
>
> Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-867:
Can you explain little more on "might be test cases cover gap."?
You mean ledger getting closed with gaps? or something else?
Regarding your suggestion of creating abstract class, you basically wanted
AdvLedgerHandle users to deal two handles,
for reading(trailing or general) use
12 matches
Mail list logo