GitHub user geomacy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/pull/47
Update tests following changes in files.preinstall inheritance
Need to update the tests following changes in inheritance
of files.preinstall, see
@Geoff, you echo my sentiments exactly. The super-easy first touch is a big
win and enabling security during 'productionization' is a common pattern
Cheers
M
On 13 September 2016 at 16:25, Geoff Macartney <
geoff.macart...@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
> hi Aled,
>
> Have been mulling this over
Github user bostko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-ui/pull/33#discussion_r78585881
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -39,6 +39,33 @@
JavaScript+HTML GUI for interacting with Brooklyn, using the REST
API
+
Github user bostko commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/328
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user bostko commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-library/pull/63
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user bostko commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/pull/46
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user ahgittin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/329
fix long-running unit test
/cc @aledsage is this the best fix? (it stalls for 2m most the time when
doing `mvn clean install` without this. haven't thought too much about it
though!)
hi Aled,
Have been mulling this over since this debate started, and I actually like your
‘Alternative Proposal 2’ - out-of-the-box there is no authentication.
That would be a super-easy experience for first-time users. For admins
installing a production machine, they’ll always expect to have
+1 for "New Proposal"
Svet.
> On 13.09.2016 г., at 17:56, John McCabe wrote:
>
> +1 on the prompt for user creation if none-exists
>
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, 15:32 Aled Sage, wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I still think we really need to change the
GitHub user neykov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-ui/pull/33
Update pom SCM & Jenkins URLs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/neykov/brooklyn-ui fix/pom-info
Alternatively you can review
+1 on the prompt for user creation if none-exists
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, 15:32 Aled Sage, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I still think we really need to change the status quo. For me, there are
> two very compelling arguments:
>
> 1. In karaf, it will always prompt for a username and
GitHub user neykov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/27
Re-use pom config from brooklyn-server
Analogously to brooklyn-library reuse pom configuration from
brooklyn-server. While not ideal this allows us to have version and plugin
configuration
GitHub user neykov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/pull/46
Update pom SCM & Jenkins URLs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/neykov/brooklyn-dist fix/pom-info
Alternatively you can
GitHub user neykov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/26
Update pom SCM & Jenkins URLs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/neykov/brooklyn-client fix/pom-info
Alternatively you can
GitHub user neykov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-library/pull/63
Update pom SCM & Jenkins URLs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/neykov/brooklyn-library fix/pom-info
Alternatively you
GitHub user neykov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/328
Update pom SCM & Jenkins URLs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/neykov/brooklyn-server fix/pom-info
Alternatively you
Hi all,
I still think we really need to change the status quo. For me, there are
two very compelling arguments:
1. In karaf, it will always prompt for a username and password.
If running in localhost, you can enter any text and it will accept
it. But you do have to "log in".
2. If
Hi Sam,
Long term, we want to switch to just Karaf (installed via RPM/DEB).
However, before we switch to Karaf being the "official Brooklyn way",
we'll need to spend some more time working on Karaf and on RPM/DEB.
(The previous RPM/DEB work was against the tgz dist, and will need
revisiting).
Github user geomacy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/326
ð LGTM, changes make sense
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
19 matches
Mail list logo