Bringing Apache Brooklyn RPM package to the official Fedora repositories

Hi, What do you think about adding Apache Brooklyn to Fedora and from there to Redhat and CentOS? As an opensource project I think it will be good to bring it to more wider audience to the Fedora Community. However before applying, when reading Fedora's Package Review Process

Publishing Apache Brooklyn RPM package to Fedora

What do you think about adding Apache Brooklyn to Fedora and from there to Redhat and CentOS? As an opensource project I think it will be good to bring it to more wider audience to the Fedora Community. However before applying, when reading Fedora's Package Review Process

Build failed in Jenkins: brooklyn-server-master #49

See -- [...truncated 46614 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] Brooklyn Server Root ... SUCCESS [ 8.114 s] [INFO] Brooklyn Parent Project SUCCESS [

[GitHub] brooklyn-docs pull request: Initial OSGi docs

Github user sjcorbett commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-docs/pull/44#issuecomment-208466458 Looks good. Do you want me to double check any of the instructions in particular? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

[GitHub] brooklyn-docs pull request: Initial OSGi docs

Github user sjcorbett commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-docs/pull/44#discussion_r59246331 --- Diff: guide/misc/osgi.md --- @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +--- +title: FAQ +layout: website-normal +--- + +# Running Apache Brooklin

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request: Add catalog.bom application white/bl...

GitHub user geomacy reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/106 Add catalog.bom application white/blacklists. Note this PR depends on https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/100 and should be merged after it. Any bundle with a

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request: Add catalog.bom application white/bl...

Github user geomacy closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/106 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request: New PerUserEntitlementManager keywor...

Github user sjcorbett commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/108#discussion_r59217258 --- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/brooklyn/core/mgmt/entitlement/PerUserEntitlementManager.java --- @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ private static

[jira] [Created] (BROOKLYN-254) Setting the type in an effector parameter always returns java.lang.Object

John McCabe created BROOKLYN-254: Summary: Setting the type in an effector parameter always returns java.lang.Object Key: BROOKLYN-254 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-254 Project:

[jira] [Created] (BROOKLYN-253) Effector APIs ParameterSummary should include label property

John McCabe created BROOKLYN-253: Summary: Effector APIs ParameterSummary should include label property Key: BROOKLYN-253 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-253 Project: Brooklyn

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request: pull displayName from flags in Locat...

Github user tbouron commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/111#issuecomment-208343949 Tested, LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[jira] [Commented] (BROOKLYN-250) displayName in location brooklyn.config not being used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15235089#comment-15235089 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BROOKLYN-250: - Github user tbouron commented on the pull request:

[jira] [Commented] (BROOKLYN-250) displayName in location brooklyn.config not being used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15234900#comment-15234900 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BROOKLYN-250: - GitHub user johnmccabe opened a pull request:

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request: Verify windows up time parameter.

Github user aledsage commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/110#discussion_r59184219 --- Diff: software/winrm/src/main/java/org/apache/brooklyn/location/winrm/WinRmMachineLocation.java --- @@ -80,6 +81,9 @@ public static

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request: Verify windows up time parameter.

Github user aledsage commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/110#discussion_r59183890 --- Diff: locations/jclouds/src/main/java/org/apache/brooklyn/location/jclouds/JcloudsLocation.java --- @@ -2742,14 +2743,53 @@ protected

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request: Deprecate BashCommands.ifExecutableE...

Github user sjcorbett commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/109#discussion_r59178399 --- Diff: utils/common/src/main/java/org/apache/brooklyn/util/ssh/BashCommands.java --- @@ -235,17 +235,33 @@ public static String

[GitHub] brooklyn-client pull request: Minor README update to remove remark...

GitHub user geomacy opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/17 Minor README update to remove remark redundant since vendoring added. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[GitHub] brooklyn-docs pull request: Initial OSGi docs

GitHub user neykov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-docs/pull/44 Initial OSGi docs You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/neykov/brooklyn-docs osgi Alternatively you can review and apply these

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request: Support removal of catalog entries f...

Github user geomacy commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/100#issuecomment-208239512 hi @neykov that's squashed with previous commit and pushed in 47421cb --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply