Metrics

Gents, after a bit of wrestling with Hudson, I give you our metrics build. It runs our coverage task, Saikuro and Saikuro as a treemap (courtesy of ThoughtWorks, thanks to Ketan Padegaonkar). Every build will archive the artifacts, so you can safely refer to those URLs going forward to see how w

Re: Functional testing harness

Thanks for correcting me. Yes, integration tests it is. And yes, we can't do anything serious without them. On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 14:01, Assaf Arkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> There actually will be crucial differenc

Re: Functional testing harness

ound to me. At this point, I'd like to commit what I have, and refine to do a testbed as you suggest. Believe it or not, this is looking pretty exciting to me :) On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 21:48, Peter Donald wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: >

Metrics

I read this blog postfrom Ketan and immediately integrated his stuff into our code. We now have a way to tell whether our code is complex! I will append it to our build. Thanks, Antoine

Functional testing harness

I'm looking for volunteers to take a quick look at the patch attached to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-456 And tell me what they think. The goal is to see Buildr in action. We have spec coverage but we have had bad surprises on each of our releases because we lack functional testi

Re: Scala 2.8 is out!

Thanks to Alex the job is done (BUILDR-484). Thanks Alex! On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:27, Antoine Toulme wrote: > Very cool. Yes, we must wait a bit. I will need to install 2.8 on our > hudson infra to make sure all our specs pass when we do the switch, I don't > see any bloc

Re: File::SEPARATOR on Windows

The fix is simple - I don't understand why we don't detect the problem with our specs on our Windows CI build. I'll commit the fix now, I'll try to follow up with specs. On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 14:38, Antoine Toulme wrote: > Thanks Alex! That's what I needed. > &g

Re: File::SEPARATOR on Windows

ize_path(path, *dirs) > ... > end > > Sounds like Commands.path_to_bin should use normalize_path() instead of > expand_path(). > > alex > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> It looks like calling out Java doesn't work well

File::SEPARATOR on Windows

It looks like calling out Java doesn't work well on Windows, in particular this h2.rake home made extension on Apache ODE: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ode/trunk/tasks/h2.rake?view=markup The log looks like this: https://gist.github.com/c304862ba875ba29b12f/469ac1e899ccbe1dd76ea1c2cb1081bdf5a0c47

Re: 1.4.2 progress

ache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-466 >> > >> > Is there a good way to determine what issues need attention? For >> example, >> > if >> > there's no one assigned to a task? Most of the issues I see seem to be >> > either in progress already, waiting t

Re: Scala 2.8 is out!

Daniel > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> So we shall support it for our next release. >> >> Daniel, do you still have that branch about it ? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Antoine >> > >

Scala 2.8 is out!

So we shall support it for our next release. Daniel, do you still have that branch about it ? Thanks, Antoine

Re: installing jruby buildr gem from source

Use gem build: jruby -S gem build buildr.gemspec Then: jruby -S gem install buildr-1.4.2.gem rake install is probably trying to install the development dependencies, that's a bad idea. I'll work on changing that. On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:28, Shane Witbeck wrote: > How is this done? I tried 'j

1.4.2 progress

We have 9 issues fixed. We have failures in the trunk: BUILDR-144 specs don't pass on JRuby. I filed JRUBY-4927 and am following up with the JRuby team on that. BUILDR-317 don't pass on MRI. There is a bug with Java constructors for RJB or something similar. I will follow up on that. Jira indicat

Re: Build failed in Hudson: buildr-ci-build-jruby #49

Created a follow up with a Jira issue (also with a better reproduction scenario): http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-4927 On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 15:14, Antoine Toulme wrote: > OK, I found a way to reproduce it! > > path = '/tmp/somewhere' > FileUtils.mkpath path > Di

Re: Build failed in Hudson: buildr-ci-build-jruby #49

5) ; File.chmod(0o755, file) ; p (File.stat(file).mode & 0o755)} You will see chmod is not applied. On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:59, Antoine Toulme wrote: > Yep, I tried that, and I tried checking File.chmod in a IRB session. > > I will try again by loading spec_helpers first. > > Sorry

Re: Build failed in Hudson: buildr-ci-build-jruby #49

txt > > ~/projects/buildr ➔ jruby -e "Dir['foo.txt'].each {|f| File.chmod(0o577, > f)}" > > ~/projects/buildr ➔ ls -l foo.txt > -r-xrwxrwx 1 headius staff 0 Jul 8 03:07 foo.txt > > - Charlie > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: >

Re: buildr website issue when browsing with IE

Greetings old man! I'm not so concerned about the width than the length, mind you :) On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:21, Assaf Arkin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> Yes. The site feels very blog centric and 2007ish. Using the whole width &

Re: buildr website issue when browsing with IE

u, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> Thanks. I found the issue yesterday night but ran out of battery. The >> negative margin for h1, h2, h3, eh ? >> >> I'll use your patch. >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 08:26, Shane Witb

Re: buildr website issue when browsing with IE

Thanks. I found the issue yesterday night but ran out of battery. The negative margin for h1, h2, h3, eh ? I'll use your patch. On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 08:26, Shane Witbeck wrote: > I submitted a patch for this. > > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Antoine Toulme > wro

Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: buildr-ci-build-jruby #49

It looks like we have a jruby problem. Charles, can you check out the Buildr trunk and run: jruby -S spec spec/core/common_spec.rb -l 547 It looks like the chmod we make line 544 doesn't change anything. You can change the line to this to see the problem: Dir['src/*'].each { |file| p (File.st

Back to the grind for 1.4.2

I have listed the issues I'd like to see fixed for 1.4.2 here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR/fixforversion/12315179 I can't commit to a date for a release but I'd like it to happen in a month from now. Now is the time to send patches! Antoine

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.1 release

The vote is closed. Thanks all! We have a new release! On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:23, Antoine Toulme wrote: > We have 3 binding +1s, 0 +0s, 0 -1s. > > We have 1 non-binding +1. > > Since the 4th of July weekend impacted this vote, let's keep it open till > tomorrow morni

Re: buildr website issue when browsing with IE

I'll take a look but I'm no IE expert. I'll file a bug for it. On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 07:30, Shane Witbeck wrote: > I just noticed some text is getting cut off on the buildr website when > browsing via IE. I hate IE just as much as the next person but maybe this > should be fixed for the version

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.1 release

; > alex > > On Friday, July 2, 2010, Rhett Sutphin wrote: > > Hi Antoine, > > > > On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > > >> Thanks Daniel. > >> > >> Yes, Alex said we should a maintenance release in a couple of

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.1 release

good (passing) > test suite (both of which are the case with buildr), there's no need for > months to elapse between releases. > > > > Rhett > > > >> > >> Daniel > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Antoine Toulme >wr

[VOTE] Buildr 1.4.1 release

We're voting on the source distributions available here: http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/ Specifically: http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.tgz http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.zip The documentation generated for

Chaining builds

I will change the builds to chain them: first, MRI, then jruby, then jruby jdk5, then jruby win32. This way there will be less noise when the 4 of them fail.

Re: Ant 1.8.1 upgrade requires Antwrap changes

us fails intermittently * Fixed: BUILDR-461 Packages with different ids collide * Fixed: BUILDR-439 "The command line is too long" when running TestNG tests I'll cut a RC tonight/tomorrow morning. On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 09:13, Alex Boisvert wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:53 A

Re: Ant 1.8.1 upgrade requires Antwrap changes

dependency on TraX in antwrap) > > alex > > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> It looked like a small update, but Ant 1.8.1 actually stops depending on >> ant-trax, and that complicates things a bit. >> >> >> I opene

Ant 1.8.1 upgrade requires Antwrap changes

It looked like a small update, but Ant 1.8.1 actually stops depending on ant-trax, and that complicates things a bit. I opened this issue for tracking purposes: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=28338&group_id=2821&atid=10895 We might just keep 1.8.0 for some more time. Th

Fwd: [jira] Commented: (BUILDR-459) Update gemspec to accept json_pure ~> 1.4.3

459 > Project: Buildr > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Packaging >Affects Versions: 1.4 >Reporter: Alex Boisvert >Assignee: Antoine Toulme > Fix For: 1.4.1 > > > As reported in this thread: http://mark

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.0 release

t; On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> Done: http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=3180 >> >> Still some updating to do on the website. >> >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 16:52, Antoine Toulme > >wrote: >> >> > Gem

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.0 release

Done: http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=3180 Still some updating to do on the website. On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 16:52, Antoine Toulme wrote: > Gems have been pushed to rubygems. I'll try uploading the all-in-one > package to rubyforge. > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 15:46,

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.0 release

Gems have been pushed to rubygems. I'll try uploading the all-in-one package to rubyforge. On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 15:46, Antoine Toulme wrote: > I uploaded the new website (see the tagline change ?). I have yet to do a > bit of updating to show off our latest release. Any help in u

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.0 release

all your hard work on this release! > > Daniel > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> The vote passed with 3 bindings +1 and 3 non-binding +1. >> >> Thanks everybody for your efforts on pushing this release out! >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.0 release

cutting the release now, fixing later. Again, remember that there >>> are >>> very few bugs which are *more* critical than our outstanding rubygems >>> issue >>> with 1.3.5. >>> >>> Daniel >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:26

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.0 release

Jira bug, so I lost track of it. And most important, I'm out of juice. I need this release out now or I'll give up. That's me drawing the line in the sand. On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 09:15, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt < pepijn.vaneeckho...@luciad.com> wrote: > On 17/6/2010 17:38,

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.0 release

gt; sudden your working script is now broken for non-obvious reasons. > > Pepijn > > > On 16/6/2010 17:08, Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> We're voting on the source distributions available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC5/dist/ >> >> S

Re: 1.4.0RC5

Thanks Alex, much appreciated. On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 13:23, Alex Boisvert wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Antoine Toulme >wrote: > > > Available here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC5< > http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/

[VOTE] Buildr 1.4.0 release

Added: New "test:failed" task to execute only tests that failed during last run (Antoine Toulme) * Added: Project extensions (before/after_define) now support dependency ordering similar to Rake (e.g. before_define(:my_setup => :compile) * Added: BUILDR-

1.4.0RC5

Available here: http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC5 I'd like to start to vote this as our release. I'm not sure if it's ok to call a vote on a vote, but I'd like to get Alex's approval. Alex, ok to open a vote for this release ? Antoine

Re: Buildr 1.4.0 RC1

t from my local username, > so the release task doesn't work for me. :-) > > Daniel > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Antoine Toulme >wrote: > > > I'll try to cut RC2 now, unless you're on it ? > > > > Thanks Daniel! > > > &g

all-in-one package distribution

We're days away from the release (It will happen this week, I promise). Our all-in-one package is jruby+buildr, using a script put together by Alex. It delivers well: we get to have tight integration with jruby which gives us a ant-like solution. However we cannot, I think, make it available from

Re: RC4 status

th rubygems. This is a pretty critical bug, and I think it's > important that we don't lose sight of that fact as we try to squash any > remaining issues in 1.4. Just my two cents. > > Daniel > > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: >

RC4 status

Buildr devs, my week-end consisted of looking into ODE to make it work well with the latest release. It turns out ODE uses the Hibernate task and specializes it in an invalid way. I committed changes that will fix the issue durably. There were no problem in the core files themselves. I spent Sun

Re: Functional testing of RC4

And taking a look at the test failing, it looks like it misses imports for asserts. I'll cut a new RC with my latest changes. On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:07, Antoine Toulme wrote: > OK, got the cycle under control. I filed ODE-846 as a follow up and I > committed a few changes f

Re: Functional testing of RC4

OK, got the cycle under control. I filed ODE-846 as a follow up and I committed a few changes for Buildr's hibernate task. On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:11, Antoine Toulme wrote: > Commenting on my own email: > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:01, Antoine Toulme wrote: > >>

Re: Functional testing of RC4

separate stable and feature branches > to address these sorts of critical issues. > > Thanks for reading all that, > Rhett > > [1]: Indeed, I have so many problems with it that the other day when I (for > the first time) encountered a valid cyclical dependency failure I initially

Re: Functional testing of RC4

Commenting on my own email: On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:01, Antoine Toulme wrote: > I tried some functional testing of RC4 with Apache ODE. > > It didn't play well. > > First, here is still an issue with tag_name over git. I thought this was > fixed, but our API obviously

Functional testing of RC4

I tried some functional testing of RC4 with Apache ODE. It didn't play well. First, here is still an issue with tag_name over git. I thought this was fixed, but our API obviously is still not ready. We should at the very least die with a deprecation message. I'll work on that this week-end. Seco

Re: New kind of bogus circular dependency in 1.4.0RC4

I'm thinking it's not new and not blocking, though an interesting one. The way I see it, it might be invalid. We can probably take a look at it in the coming weeks. On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 20:44, Rhett Sutphin wrote: > Hi Antoine, > > On Jun 10, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Antoine Toul

Re: Why stop so short

Hi Paul, thanks for the kind words, and hello to Cosmo :) We have been preparing this release for quite a while with our meager resources. We're sorry to fall short your expectations. If you can devote some time to our project, we would be ravished if you could open bugs for the items you mentio

Buildr 1.4.0 RC4

All, Buildr 1.4.0 RC4 is available here: http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC4/ Please play with it. This is very likely our GA. I will open a vote for it tomorrow. Thanks, Antoine

Re: T-shirts

I would buy one or two. Alex, you have that logo somewhere don't you ? On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 15:10, Daniel Spiewak wrote: > The unfortunate thing is that we *don't* have access to a high-res version > of the Buildr logo (I ran into this while creating my presentation for > Profict Spring Camp

Re: Testing

> Daniel > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> Our four builds are now green. I am updating RJB to the latest version as >> it >> comes with some useful fixes and hopefully more stability. >> Then all-in-one and release. >

Re: Testing

Our four builds are now green. I am updating RJB to the latest version as it comes with some useful fixes and hopefully more stability. Then all-in-one and release. On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 23:59, Tal Rotbart wrote: > Nice! > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote

Re: Testing

I fixed BUILDR-355 and am cutting a RC. On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 14:56, Antoine Toulme wrote: > Yes. I worked extensively with the rubinius team. They changed quite a few > C calls that were calling old APIs. > > You can look at the work made here: > http://github.com/atoulme/rjb

Re: Testing

hangeLog is rather evasive; were > there any fixes since RJB 1.2.0 that would help with MRI + JDK6? > > alex > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> The CI build passed with RJB 1.2.5. >> >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 14:38, D

Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #20

We have a little problem with a spec that doesn't pass intermittently, most likely because we wait 0.5 instead of a full second and hence get the wrong reading on the utime. Will change to 1s. -- Forwarded message -- From: Apache Hudson Server Date: Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 16:04 Subj

Testing

We now have 4 official CI builds polling hourly the SVN for changes: * JRuby ubuntu: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/buildr-ci-build-jruby * JRuby ubuntu jdk5: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/buildr-ci-build-jruby-jdk5 * MRI Ubuntu: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Bui

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #11

the apache jira instance right now, so I can't > attach this patch just yet. It works for me locally, could you give this a > try as well? > > Pepijn > > > On 9/6/2010 08:54, Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> Here goes: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUI

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #11

efer > another RC first just to be sure? > > Pepijn > > > On 9/6/2010 17:36, Alex Boisvert wrote: > >> Great! Glad to be back to 100% green. >> >> alex >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Antoine Toulme > <mailto:anto...@lunar-ocean

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #11

l? > > Pepijn > > > On 9/6/2010 08:54, Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> Here goes: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-453 >> >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 23:51, Antoine Toulme> >wrote: >> >> Oh yes! I wanted to file a bug to track

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #11

Here goes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-453 On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 23:51, Antoine Toulme wrote: > Oh yes! I wanted to file a bug to track this. > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 23:50, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt < > pepijn.vaneeckho...@luciad.com> wrote: > >&

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #11

tests. > > Pepijn > > > On 9/6/2010 08:05, Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> OK, we now have a CI build with MRI. >> >> We have 4 failures... we need to fix them before we take it further. >> >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 22:51, Apache Hudson

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr-ci-build #11

OK, we now have a CI build with MRI. We have 4 failures... we need to fix them before we take it further. On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 22:51, Apache Hudson Server < hud...@hudson.zones.apache.org> wrote: > See > >

Re: Fwd: Hudson build is back to normal : buildr-ci-build-jruby #13

On my todo list: 1. upgrade the script to jruby 1.5.1 2. Create a reliable CI build on Windows - it just happens that Apache infra has one, I opened a request to get access. I will issue a RC tonight if 1. is complete. On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 08:47, Antoine Toulme wrote: > We're pre

Re: Fwd: Hudson build is back to normal : buildr-ci-build-jruby #13

her > blocking items? > > Pepijn > > > On 8/6/2010 00:24, Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> We pass all specs with jruby 1.5.1. >> >> I'll upgrade our windows build as well in the coming days. >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From

Fwd: Hudson build is back to normal : buildr-ci-build-jruby #13

We pass all specs with jruby 1.5.1. I'll upgrade our windows build as well in the coming days. -- Forwarded message -- From: Apache Hudson Server Date: Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 15:21 Subject: Hudson build is back to normal : buildr-ci-build-jruby #13 To: c...@buildr.apache.org See <

Re: ScalaSpecs jdk6 only ?

Giving it some thought while doing house work yesterday, I'm thinking those specs should only run with a jdk6. I'll put a condition around the Scala Specs specs. On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:50, Antoine Toulme wrote: > After some enquiry over IRC (where apparently mentioning jdk5 mak

Re: ScalaSpecs jdk6 only ?

so I was told the problem would go away if we used a compiled version of ScalaSpecs that used a target compatibility of 1.5. Before I take it further, do we have objections ? On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:30, Antoine Toulme wrote: > Guys, > > I'm seeing this error when running s

ScalaSpecs jdk6 only ?

Guys, I'm seeing this error when running specs with jdk5: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.apache.buildr.SpecsSingletonRunner.run(SpecsSingletonRunner.java:54) at org.apache.buildr.SpecsSingletonRunner.main(Spe

Re: Windows issues

onally so I can't help much more to speed this along than I already > have. > > I'll upload the jruby jar to my website and send you a link asap. > > Pepijn > > > On 2/6/2010 16:56, Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> I would appreciate if you could send me your

Re: Windows issues

lternatively, if you have everything set up to build jruby > I can just provide you the patched jnr-posix.jar file. > > Pepijn > > > On 2/6/2010 16:16, Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> Will do - I did not apply the previous one to SVN btw, just locally. >> Thanks >> fo

Re: Windows issues

ine, could you > revert the previous patch and apply the new one and then retest please? > > Regards, > > Pepijn > > > On 1/6/2010 17:20, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt wrote: > >> JRUBY-4837 >> >> Op 1-jun-2010 om 17:13 heeft Antoine Toulme >> het volgende gesch

Re: Update on JRuby 1.5 support

t; > I guess I'll have to install from trunk, due to this and also Buildr > > 1.3.5 doesn't support rubygem 1.8.6/7 > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-384). > > > > Is the authoritative trunk still SVN or is it on git? > > > > Cheer

Re: Update on JRuby 1.5 support

by 1.5 is > confusing -- am I correct in understanding that it is only with Buildr > 1.4 that the support for JRuby 1.5 will be available? > > Cheers, > Tal > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > > How about we add a spec for it over ru

Re: Windows issues

I'll give it a try today. We might be lucky and have your patch accepted for 1.5.1 - I'll chat with the JRuby team about it. Do you have the bug number ? On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 07:45, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt wrote: > I've traced the directory utime issue back to the jnr-posix project which > is used

new CI build list

As requested, here is the CI build list for Buildr builds: c...@buildr.apache.org Daniel, Alex and I are moderators of this list. I will redirect builds to it in the coming days. Thanks! Antoine

Re: Fixing the specs on Windows

We'll live. On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:16, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt < pepijn.vaneeckho...@luciad.com> wrote: > I've been going through the specs and up until now all failures are related > to utime not behaving as expected on windows. I'm changing the specs so that > they don't rely on utime but use

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr CI on Windows #6

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2751 On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:04, Antoine Toulme wrote: > Oh ok. Hudson only sends emails when build is failing OR on the first build > where the build is successful again. > > So it should be less noise hopefully. > > > On Fri,

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr CI on Windows #6

Oh ok. Hudson only sends emails when build is failing OR on the first build where the build is successful again. So it should be less noise hopefully. On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:01, Daniel Spiewak wrote: > > Hey, you're not going to not read those emails, are you :) ? > > > > I don't even read

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr CI on Windows #6

Hey, you're not going to not read those emails, are you :) ? Yes, I will ask for the creation of a new list. That might not happen before a week though. On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:50, Daniel Spiewak wrote: > I second the motion. Gmail filters work wonders, but it's still extra > trouble. > > D

Re: spec 'should not touch target directory unless running'?

sleep 1 should cut it (it's in seconds). Go go go! On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:02, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt < pepijn.vaneeckho...@luciad.com> wrote: > First failure I checked was this one: > > it 'should not touch target directory unless running' do >mkpath 'target' ; File.utime @early, @early, '

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr CI on Windows #6

wrote: > Still specific to Windows 7 or just Windows in general? > > Pepijn > > > On 28/5/2010 18:01, Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> I will install Scala on the Windows machine and will change the message to >> get the full build log. >> >> On Fri, May 28, 2

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr CI on Windows #6

I will install Scala on the Windows machine and will change the message to get the full build log. On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 00:08, wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [toulmean] partial fix for BUILDR-445: relax rspec dependency > > --

Re: Overview of issues blocking 1.4.0 release

Hi Pepjin, we have spec failures on Windows, and it looks like we reproduce 2 spec failures with jruby on ubuntu. We have nightly builds on Windows, can you see my email with the failures ? On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 02:18, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt < pepijn.vaneeckho...@luciad.com> wrote: > Which issu

Buildr CI on Windows

I took a first stab at making a Buildr CI. I installed Hudson on a machine at work that runs Windows XP. The build runs rake spec daily if changes are detected, and reports if failures are found. The build runs with MRI on Windows XP Pro. It returned 37 failures on trunk, which is noticeably more

Re: Update on JRuby 1.5 support

nt to file a bug or not. > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > > Alex pointed me to the fact that a.mtime == b.mtime compares values to a > > unit smaller than a second, while it apparently stops at the second so > far > > with MRI. > >

Re: Update on JRuby 1.5 support

Wed, May 26, 2010 at 15:14, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 15:02, Charles Oliver Nutter < > head...@headius.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> I have not look

Re: Update on JRuby 1.5 support

need to get it in. > So far nothing to report. > > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > > I commented on BUILDR-443. I am not sure the bugs with mtime we have over > > Windows 7 are particularly relevant to JRuby (but I could not get RJB to > >

Re: Update on JRuby 1.5 support

to a few specific > cases it would help. I wouldn't be surprised if it were something > reasonably simple, but it's buried in a very large file :) > > - Charlie > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > > Good news! > > > > We got a

Re: Update on JRuby 1.5 support

art of it. If I get some time this weekend, I'll try to tackle some of the > Windows 7 failures. > > Daniel > > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> Good news! >> >> We got all specs pass on JRuby 1.5. They had a bug, full s

Update on JRuby 1.5 support

Good news! We got all specs pass on JRuby 1.5. They had a bug, full story on BUILDR-441. Bad news! We still have some specs not passing with JRuby 1.5 and Windows 7: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-443 Good news! We're going to get them pass before you know it. @headius: let me k

Fwd: Buildr support

FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Antoine Toulme Date: Thu, May 20, 2010 at 18:04 Subject: Buildr support To: u...@jruby.codehaus.org Hi guys, we are trying to figure a way to get Buildr out of the door. First, it looks like we have failures with JRuby 1.4.1 on Windows 7

Re: 1.4, Windows 7, and a few news

It's a matter of stability. It looks like RJb crashes randomly, or stops working, or will work for a project but not for others. I did some hacking of the RJB codebase with the help of the Rubinius people, and I will work with them some more until it works on rubinius. Apparently RJB calls APIs t

Re: Missed board report

Hi Matthieu, I can probably help with that. Do you know where to write them up and where the previous ones are ? On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:04, Matthieu Riou wrote: > Hey guys, > > Seems that you missed the board report for Buildr that was due this month > (last week-end actually). So you're du

Re: 1.4, Windows 7, and a few news

The sole reason why I installed a Windows 7 VM is to help with this. I also am stranded these days, and am running this on the side. Oh well. On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 21:51, Alex Boisvert wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> We still have no 1

Re: 1.4, Windows 7, and a few news

On RJB, by the way, the Rubinius guys looked at the code with me and they saw a few deprecated/bad practice/invalid places in the code. I'm not sure if that would help at all having that code behave but it's worth trying. On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 21:28, Antoine Toulme wrote: > You

<    1   2   3   4   >