Maven interop
* Generate a maven POM based on a Buildr project
* Create& deploy maven friendly artifacts based on a Buildr project
Would there be any benefit for having Ivy interoperability as well?
p
From: Michael Guymon
To: dev@buildr.apache.org
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Michael Guymon
wrote:
> Yeah, did not even think of that. That makes a good argument for using a dsl
> with the lock file, something along the lines of:
I still really like the idea of a yml file because it is much easier
to process in other programs. At one stag
#x27;t necessarily have to :-)
Maven interop
* Generate a maven POM based on a Buildr project
* Create& deploy maven friendly artifacts based on a Buildr project
Would there be any benefit for having Ivy interoperability as well?
p
__**__
From: Michael Guymon
To: de
>>- org.apache.cassandra:**cassalndra-all:1.0.1
>>exclude:
>>- *:servlet-api:*
>>- *:junit:*
>>
>> That would be pretty handy - I really like the idea of the dependency
>> report effectively acting as the whitelist / blacklist so when the
Hi Rehett,
On 12/28/2011 03:02 PM, Rhett Sutphin wrote:
---
>
> dependencies:
>com.slackworks:model-citizen:0.1:
/home/zinger/devel/projects/swx/lockjar/tmp/test-repo/com/slackworks/model-citizen/0.1/model-citizen-0.1.jar
>org.apache.mina:mina-core:jar:2.0.4:
/home/zinger/devel/pro
rse changes
>> my build file doesn't necessarily have to :-)
>>
>>> Maven interop
>>>
>>> * Generate a maven POM based on a Buildr project
>>> * Create& deploy maven friendly artifacts based on a Buildr project
>>>
>>>
as well?
p
From: Michael Guymon
To: dev@buildr.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 3 November 2011, 23:16
Subject: Re: Experiences with transitive dependencies in buildr
So based on the discussion, it sounds like the following solutions would work
well:
Dependency Resolutio
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Michael Guymon
wrote:
> So there seems to be agreement on a initial solution. Should this be tracked
> in Jira?
Sounds good.
> I plan on helping out, but work is eating all my spare time right now. On
> top of that, I have a queue of patches I need to send out, s
a Buildr project
Would there be any benefit for having Ivy interoperability as well?
p
From: Michael Guymon
To: dev@buildr.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 3 November 2011, 23:16
Subject: Re: Experiences with transitive dependencies in buildr
So based on the d
> I'd wdd filtering and blacklist has been useful as well.
FWIW, if you want a works-now solution, ixy.xml/ivy4r can have
statements that work against transitive dependencies. Not to take away
from the long-term dependency resolution discussions, which I'm glad to
see happening.
- Stephen
Buildr project
>
>Would there be any benefit for having Ivy interoperability as well?
p
From: Michael Guymon
To: dev@buildr.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 3 November 2011, 23:16
Subject: Re: Experiences with transitive dependencies in buildr
So based on the di
Hi Peter & Michael,
With buildr-dependency-extensions
(https://github.com/jvshahid/buildr-dependency-extensions) you get
both a POM generator and transitive dependency resolution (both
optional).
So essentially everything except:
> * Create/Rebuild a dependency file
> * Lock dependencies based o
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Michael Guymon
wrote:
> So based on the discussion, it sounds like the following solutions would
> work well:
>
> Dependency Resolution
>
> * Dependency resolution is optional
> * Resolve Transitive Dependencies for an artifact(s)
> * Create/Rebuild a dependency
So based on the discussion, it sounds like the following solutions would
work well:
Dependency Resolution
* Dependency resolution is optional
* Resolve Transitive Dependencies for an artifact(s)
* Create/Rebuild a dependency file
* Lock dependencies based on the dependency file
Maven int
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Chiaming Hsu wrote:
> If this becomes part of the core of buildr as Peter suggested, would there be
> performance impact when not using transitive dependencies?
I would hope not.
I am not a huge fan of transitive closure across the builds when you
can't loc
l
>> (as it is in buildr now) and avoid any performance impact for projects not
>> using transitive dependencies, if we brought in more "Maven stuff" into
>> core buildr library.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chiaming Hsu
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
if we brought in more "Maven stuff" into core buildr library.
Cheers,
Chiaming Hsu
From: Peter Donald
To: dev@buildr.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: Experiences with transitive dependencies in buildr
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 2
Thoughts in-lined below. . .
On 11/01/2011 11:40 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Michael Guymon
wrote:
The integration with buildr is crude and for some reason the rdoc is no
longer formated correct. I will update it to make it legible again.
https://github.com/
s,
Chiaming Hsu
From: Peter Donald
To: dev@buildr.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: Experiences with transitive dependencies in buildr
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Michael Guymon
wrote:
> The integration with buildr is crude and for some
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Michael Guymon
wrote:
> The integration with buildr is crude and for some reason the rdoc is no
> longer formated correct. I will update it to make it legible again.
>
> https://github.com/mguymon/buildr-resolver
nice.
> This is the ruby wrapper for the Aeth
it could be simpler, have / can you published your wrapper?
p
From: Michael Guymon
To: dev@buildr.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 28 October 2011, 16:09
Subject: Re: Experiences with transitive dependencies in buildr
I had a similar experience when I started needing transitive resolution
: Experiences with transitive dependencies in buildr
I had a similar experience when I started needing transitive resolution, but
went a different route. My solution is a wrapper around Maven's dependency
resolution framework, Aether. I have a hybrid Buildr setup, where Buildr can
load a pom to ge
> My solution is a wrapper around Maven's dependency resolution
> framework, Aether. I have a hybrid Buildr setup, where Buildr can load
> a pom to get all the dependencies but Buildr does all the heavy
> lifting.
Nice! I was hoping someone would do this. Is your Buildr/Aether plugin
published so
I had a similar experience when I started needing transitive resolution,
but went a different route. My solution is a wrapper around Maven's
dependency resolution framework, Aether. I have a hybrid Buildr setup,
where Buildr can load a pom to get all the dependencies but Buildr does
all the hea
About a year ago I started using buildr. I needed to move from Ant, and
integrate with maven projects, but had always found maven deeply frustrating I
thought I'd share my experiences of using buildr and my recommendations.
But first why not maven:
* Always seems to need internet connec
25 matches
Mail list logo
