Nice Job, Stamatis !
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年9月11日 +0800 AM5:28，Stamatis Zampetakis ，写道：
> Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given
> their comments and votes.
>
> The tally is as follows.
>
> 4 binding +1s:
> Julian H., Francis, Vladimir, Stamatis
>
> 6 non-binding +1s:
I should have given more context but I think Julian's response is similar
and close to (if not just the same as) what I faced.
I tried
"select * FROM TABLE(TUMBLE_TVF(ORDERS, ROWTIME, INTERVAL '10' MINUTE))"
named parameters, TABLE ORDERS, TABLE(ORDERS), DESCRIPTOR(ROWTIME),
etc. were not
Thank you Francis, good job!
JulianF
Am 10.09.19, 14:34 schrieb "Francis Chuang" :
Thanks for getting this massive release out, Stamatis!
Francis
On 11/09/2019 7:27 am, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given
Thanks for getting this massive release out, Stamatis!
Francis
On 11/09/2019 7:27 am, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote:
Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given
their comments and votes.
The tally is as follows.
4 binding +1s:
Julian H., Francis, Vladimir, Stamatis
6
Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given
their comments and votes.
The tally is as follows.
4 binding +1s:
Julian H., Francis, Vladimir, Stamatis
6 non-binding +1s:
Anton, Julian F., Haisheng, Danny, Chunwei, Andrei
No 0s or -1s.
Therefore I am delighted to announce
Are you referring to problems parsing this:
SELECT *
FROM Tumble (
data => TABLE Bid ,
timecol => DESCRIPTOR ( bidtime ) ,
dur => INTERVAL '10' MINUTES ,
offset => INTERVAL '0' MINUTES );
If so I can see how "TABLE Bid” and "DESCRIPTOR ( bidtime ) “ might cause the
validator
I might have identified the first blocker:
I am using sql identifier as parameters for table name and column name (not
character literals), which is already how current TUMBLE works as current
TUMBLE accepts an identifier as the first parameter to specify the
TIMESTAMP column.
During planner
I have to say… if you wish to contribute this, we would definitely consider it.
It would not be the first client in a non-JVM language: Francis wrote the Go
driver and now it is part of Calcite/Avatica.
Julian
> On Sep 10, 2019, at 3:03 AM, Francis Chuang wrote:
>
> Hi Gabriel,
>
> It's
+1 (non-binding)
Minor correction: sha256 of source distribution
(apache-calcite-1.21.0-src.tar.gz) is
ccd10264f89a84bc750837cc2d0e66b7d74a81dd825d0a88f501153d4745eee3
Environment: Mac OS X Java version: 11.0.4, vendor: AdoptOpenJDK Maven 3.6.1
mvn clean install - OK
sh256 check - OK
GPG check
I always thought of a table function as a lightweight relational operator. You
could write your own UNION function, for instance. But the moment you want it
to start participating in algebraic rewrites - if you want to push filters
through it, for instance - then you had better make it into a
+1
There are OsAdapterTest.testPs and testPsDistinct failures, however they
are well known.
Vladimir
Jacob Roldan created CALCITE-3338:
-
Summary: Error with executeBatch and preparedStatement.
Key: CALCITE-3338
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3338
Project: Calcite
Issue
Hey,
when going through the Code I just had another Idea.
Currently a TableFunction is executed as EnumerableTableFunctionScan which gets
generated from a LogicalTableFunctionScan by the Rule
EnumerableTableFunctionScanRule.
What if you just remove that Rule and add a custom Rule of yours which
Hi Gabriel,
thats an interesting question for me too.
Do you need parameters for those "dynamic tables"?
If not you could do it similar to what Drill is doing and just implement a
Schema which always returns "true" if someone asks for a Table and then returns
a Table Implementation that you
Hi,
I'm currently using a combination of TableFunctions and TableMacros to
expose various dynamic (relatively unstructured) data sources via Calcite.
The underlying data sources are such that data can only be retrieved by
first specifying what you want (i.e. there is no catalog of all data that
Hi Gabriel,
It's always very exciting to see new clients/drivers for Avatica that
are contributed by the community.
We maintain a list of clients for Avatica on this page:
https://calcite.apache.org/avatica/docs/
Would it be okay to add your Javascript client to that page?
Francis
On
Martin Dearnley created CALCITE-3337:
Summary: Support query arrays of Embedded Documents in MongoDB
adapter
Key: CALCITE-3337
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3337
Project:
+1 (non-binding)
Environment: Mac OS X 10.12.6, JDK 1.8.0_201, Maven 3.5.0
- Checked signatures and checksums - OK
- Checked release note - OK
- Ran unit tests (mvn clean install) - OK
Best,
Chunwei
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:14 AM Danny Chan wrote:
> +1 Binding
>
> Environment:
Hi,
I just wanted to let anyone who's interested know that I've recently been
working on a JavaScript (i.e. Node.js) client for Avatica. The current
status is that it does what I need it to do (i.e. it can execute a query
and return the results), and it could potentially be useful to others (as
19 matches
Mail list logo
