Re: [DISCUSS] Vote format

2024-09-13 Thread Francis Chuang
+1, this is good for consistency. On 14/09/2024 7:22 am, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: It's easier to understand who is who without checking the index [1] that I do occasionally. +1 zabetak (PMC) [1] https://people.apache.org/committer-index.html On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:16 PM Julian Hyde wro

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.38.0

2024-09-13 Thread Xiong Duan
+1 We start voting in about ten days. We will merge the almost-ready PR. Cancai Cai 于2024年9月14日周六 08:55写道: > > +1,There are still many valuable PRs in Calcite. We can try to merge them > before 1.38. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls > > Best wishes, > Cancai Cai > > > 2024年9月14日 0

Re: [DISCUSS] Vote format

2024-09-13 Thread Xiong Duan
+1 xiong(Committer) Stamatis Zampetakis 于2024年9月14日周六 05:22写道: > > It's easier to understand who is who without checking the index [1] > that I do occasionally. > > +1 zabetak (PMC) > > [1] https://people.apache.org/committer-index.html > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:16 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.38.0

2024-09-13 Thread Cancai Cai
+1,There are still many valuable PRs in Calcite. We can try to merge them before 1.38. [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls Best wishes, Cancai Cai > 2024年9月14日 04:04,Julian Hyde 写道: > > +1 we’re ready for a release, and I’m happy to be RM. > > I think we could have a first RC and vot

Re: [DISCUSS] Vote format

2024-09-13 Thread Stamatis Zampetakis
It's easier to understand who is who without checking the index [1] that I do occasionally. +1 zabetak (PMC) [1] https://people.apache.org/committer-index.html On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:16 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > > There is a discussion in the Incubator list [1] that proposes a more > structur

[DISCUSS] Vote format

2024-09-13 Thread Julian Hyde
There is a discussion in the Incubator list [1] that proposes a more structured format for the line that people write in their email message when they vote. The problem is that some people use multiple names, email accounts, github accounts, and that tallying votes requires some effort. The propo

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.38.0

2024-09-13 Thread Julian Hyde
+1 we’re ready for a release, and I’m happy to be RM. I think we could have a first RC and vote in about ten days. What do others feel about timing? Julian > On Sep 13, 2024, at 4:58 AM, Benchao Li wrote: > > Last release date is 2024-05-06, sorry for the typo. > > Benchao Li 于2024年9月13日周五

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.38.0

2024-09-13 Thread Benchao Li
Last release date is 2024-05-06, sorry for the typo. Benchao Li 于2024年9月13日周五 19:52写道: > > It's been a bit more than 4 months since our last release (2023-05-06) > [1] and there are currently almost 150 new commits in main branch. Per our > tradition of producing one release every 2-3 months, I t

[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.38.0

2024-09-13 Thread Benchao Li
It's been a bit more than 4 months since our last release (2023-05-06) [1] and there are currently almost 150 new commits in main branch. Per our tradition of producing one release every 2-3 months, I think it's time to consider for next release now. According to [2], the following release manager