I don't think the the assertion is wrong, it is expected. Equivalent relational
operators should be in the same set. I think CALCITE-3981[1] fixed the
canonical issue, I suspect the rel2subset mapping is not up to date, hence the
assertion error.
[1]
Thanks, I created an issue [1] to improve the assertion.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4650
пн, 7 июн. 2021 г. в 23:30, Haisheng Yuan :
> > Shouldn't we remove the assertion above?
> Perhaps.
>
> Or perhaps the rel2Subset mapping is not up to date.
>
> Regards,
> Haisheng
> Shouldn't we remove the assertion above?
Perhaps.
Or perhaps the rel2Subset mapping is not up to date.
Regards,
Haisheng Yuan
On 2021/06/06 13:09:16, Vladimir Ozerov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When doing a trait derivation in the non-OMAKASE mode, the following lines
> of code are invoked:
> 1:
Hi,
When doing a trait derivation in the non-OMAKASE mode, the following lines
of code are invoked:
1: RelSubset relSubset = planner.register(newRel, rel);
2: assert relSubset.set == planner.getSubset(rel).set;
The assertion on the second line may fail because the "newRel" is assigned
not the
