Re: JIRA Github integration

[Michael Mior]

Was just reminded of this after creating a PR for the calcite-avatica repo
and seeing this in action. Since there are no objections, seems like it
would be good to get this set up.

@Julian Unfortunately I'm currently ignorant as to how to request this from
infra. Is it just a matter of creating an issue on the INFRA JIRA?

--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org

2017-11-27 16:21 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde :

> No objections from me, as long as it doesn’t cause excessive posts to the
> dev list.
>
> As a small project this is an area we have under-invested. Larger projects
> such as Spark seem to have very nice integration between GitHub, JIRA and
> various CIs.
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On Nov 27, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Michael Mior  wrote:
> >
> > Sounds fine to me personally although perhaps others have some objections
> > I'm not aware of.
> >
> > --
> > Michael Mior
> > mm...@apache.org
> >
> > 2017-11-27 15:44 GMT-05:00 Enrico Olivelli :
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> I see that there is no automatic link between PRs and JIRA.
> >> In Apache BookKeeper (I am committer there) we have such link: if you
> name
> >> a PR with for instance CALCITE-Xxx and you cite the issue id in commit
> >> messages Apache Github bot is able to copy every comment to JIRA
> >> automatically.
> >> I think this we be very useful.
> >> I think that just an infra ticket can enable it.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Enrico
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >> -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>
>
>

Re: Towards Calcite release 1.15

[Michael Mior]

Thanks for once again being release manager!

--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org

On Dec 9, 2017 4:30 PM, "Julian Hyde"  wrote:

> OK, the release vote has passed, pushed the artifacts to dist/release,
> and in a day or two I will make the official release announcement and
> update the site.
>
> I've merged branch-1.15 to master, and master is now open for commits.
>
> Julian
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Julian Hyde  wrote:
> > I’ve just committed 707 and 2061. That leaves the following:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018 AssertionError: rel
> has
> > lower cost (julian to review PR #552)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2054 UPDATE with
> parameters
> > (julian to review PR #568)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1861 Spatial indexes
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1616 Data profiler
> >
> >
> > Also seeing some minor issues in Windows, and possibly a performance
> > regression in RelMetadataTest.testPullUpPredicatesForExprsItr.
> >
> > First RC probably tomorrow. Not all of the above will make the cut.
> >
> > Has anyone had chance to test any of the adapters?
> >
> > We’re trying to get to stable, so please don’t make commits without my
> +1 (I
> > have been running exhaustive tests before committing).
> >
> > Julian
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 27, 2017, at 11:10 AM, Julian Hyde  wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing, Michael. Yes, it’s a lot.
> >
> > Materialized views were a big motivation for doing this. You currently
> have
> > to do some tricky work with APIs to define materialized views (mappings
> > inside the planner, predicates, statistics). I wanted to demonstrate it
> > working using a few lines of SQL.
> >
> > I hadn’t really thought of DDL + adapters. Yes, I guess someone could do
> >
> >  CREATE TABLE MyCassandraSchema.MyTable (int i, date j)
> >
> > and Calcite would create a table in Cassandra. We’d need to add SPIs to
> > Schema to make that work.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 23, 2017, at 9:00 AM, Michael Mior  wrote:
> >
> > Reviewed 707. It's a lot of code, so I can't say I did a particularly
> > thorough job, but no clear issues stuck out to me and the approach seems
> > sound. Glad to see materialized views are included in there. Not
> suggesting
> > this should be part of 707, but looking forward to having some adapters
> > implement basic DDL in the future. It won't make sense for all of them,
> but
> > I can certainly see it being useful. Awesome work!
> >
> > --
> > Michael Mior
> > mm...@apache.org
> >
> > 2017-11-22 18:28 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde :
> >
> > An update on release 1.15. We’re still on track for first RC on Monday.
> >
> > We never seem to do a good job of verifying Calcite’s adapters. Can I
> have
> > volunteers to validate the Cassandra, Mongo, and Druid adapters? I plan
> to
> > test Calcite on Windows.
> >
> > The following issues remain for the release:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-707 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-707> Server and DDL
> (julian)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018> AssertionError: rel
> > has lower cost (julian to review PR #552)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2041 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2041> Adding the ability
> to
> > turn off nullability matching (julian to review PR #563 and #570)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2054 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2054> UPDATE with
> > parameters (julian to review PR #568)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2061 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2061> Parameters in OFFSET
> > and FETCH (julian to review PR #569)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1861 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1861> Spatial indexes
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1616 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1616> Data profiler
> >
> > All are “best effort”; i.e. they may not make it into the release.
> >
> > Can someone please review 707? It is an important change.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> >
> > On Nov 14, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Michael Mior  wrote:
> >
> > I looks like there are significant version upgrades available for
> >
> > libraries
> >
> > in use within adapters. Those would probably be good to include as well.
> > (The MongoDB driver in particular is three years out of date.)
> >
> > --
> > Michael Mior
> > mm...@apache.org
> >
> > 2017-11-14 14:51 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde :
> >
> > I have logged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2049 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2049>, “Release Calcite
> > 1.15.0”. Please follow that to get updates on the state of the release.
> >
> > Vova, I would like to 

Re: query about Clob Blob sql support of avatica and calcite

[F21]

Hi Victor,

Are you using Avatica with HSQLDB? CLOB is current unsupported by 
Avatica. Please see CALCITE-1957[0] to track this issue. Contributions 
are very welcomed, if you are able to contribute this feature! :)


Cheers,
Francis

On 10/12/2017 7:13 PM, victor wrote:

Hi, calcite development team:
Recently I do testing for avatica , found it did not support Clob Blob 
sql query , is it true? or some wrong with my testing process?  if it is true, 
is there some plan for fixing it , and how is the plan?please let me know as 
soon as possible,
thanks a lot,


yours  best regards


victor lv

query about Clob Blob sql support of avatica and calcite

[victor]

Hi, calcite development team:
   Recently I do testing for avatica , found it did not support Clob Blob 
sql query , is it true? or some wrong with my testing process?  if it is true, 
is there some plan for fixing it , and how is the plan?please let me know as 
soon as possible,
thanks a lot,


yours  best regards


victor lv