Thanks for once again being release manager! -- Michael Mior [email protected]
On Dec 9, 2017 4:30 PM, "Julian Hyde" <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, the release vote has passed, pushed the artifacts to dist/release, > and in a day or two I will make the official release announcement and > update the site. > > I've merged branch-1.15 to master, and master is now open for commits. > > Julian > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’ve just committed 707 and 2061. That leaves the following: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018 AssertionError: rel > has > > lower cost (julian to review PR #552) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2054 UPDATE with > parameters > > (julian to review PR #568) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1861 Spatial indexes > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1616 Data profiler > > > > > > Also seeing some minor issues in Windows, and possibly a performance > > regression in RelMetadataTest.testPullUpPredicatesForExprsItr. > > > > First RC probably tomorrow. Not all of the above will make the cut. > > > > Has anyone had chance to test any of the adapters? > > > > We’re trying to get to stable, so please don’t make commits without my > +1 (I > > have been running exhaustive tests before committing). > > > > Julian > > > > > > > > On Nov 27, 2017, at 11:10 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks for reviewing, Michael. Yes, it’s a lot. > > > > Materialized views were a big motivation for doing this. You currently > have > > to do some tricky work with APIs to define materialized views (mappings > > inside the planner, predicates, statistics). I wanted to demonstrate it > > working using a few lines of SQL. > > > > I hadn’t really thought of DDL + adapters. Yes, I guess someone could do > > > > CREATE TABLE MyCassandraSchema.MyTable (int i, date j) > > > > and Calcite would create a table in Cassandra. We’d need to add SPIs to > > Schema to make that work. > > > > Julian > > > > > > > > On Nov 23, 2017, at 9:00 AM, Michael Mior <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Reviewed 707. It's a lot of code, so I can't say I did a particularly > > thorough job, but no clear issues stuck out to me and the approach seems > > sound. Glad to see materialized views are included in there. Not > suggesting > > this should be part of 707, but looking forward to having some adapters > > implement basic DDL in the future. It won't make sense for all of them, > but > > I can certainly see it being useful. Awesome work! > > > > -- > > Michael Mior > > [email protected] > > > > 2017-11-22 18:28 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde <[email protected]>: > > > > An update on release 1.15. We’re still on track for first RC on Monday. > > > > We never seem to do a good job of verifying Calcite’s adapters. Can I > have > > volunteers to validate the Cassandra, Mongo, and Druid adapters? I plan > to > > test Calcite on Windows. > > > > The following issues remain for the release: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-707 < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-707> Server and DDL > (julian) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018 < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018> AssertionError: rel > > has lower cost (julian to review PR #552) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2041 < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2041> Adding the ability > to > > turn off nullability matching (julian to review PR #563 and #570) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2054 < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2054> UPDATE with > > parameters (julian to review PR #568) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2061 < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2061> Parameters in OFFSET > > and FETCH (julian to review PR #569) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1861 < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1861> Spatial indexes > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1616 < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1616> Data profiler > > > > All are “best effort”; i.e. they may not make it into the release. > > > > Can someone please review 707? It is an important change. > > > > Julian > > > > > > On Nov 14, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Michael Mior <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I looks like there are significant version upgrades available for > > > > libraries > > > > in use within adapters. Those would probably be good to include as well. > > (The MongoDB driver in particular is three years out of date.) > > > > -- > > Michael Mior > > [email protected] > > > > 2017-11-14 14:51 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde <[email protected]>: > > > > I have logged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2049 < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2049>, “Release Calcite > > 1.15.0”. Please follow that to get updates on the state of the release. > > > > Vova, I would like to include https://issues.apache.org/ > > jira/browse/CALCITE-2018 <https://issues.apache.org/ > > jira/browse/CALCITE-2018> too. I will definitely review your pull > > request. Sorry it’s taken me a while. > > > > Everyone, please look at https://issues.apache.org/ > > jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 <https://issues.apache.org/ > > jira/browse/CALCITE-2027>, specifically the list of other technologies I > > would like to upgrade (guava, jetty, jackson, panino, h2, hsqldb, > > > > javacc, > > > > maven) or change the “preferred” version. If there are other libraries > > > > we > > > > should upgrade, let’s discuss. At this stage I would like to be > > > > ambitious, > > > > and upgrade as far as we can. > > > > Julian > > > > > > On Nov 14, 2017, at 7:29 AM, Michael Mior <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sounds good to me. I have nothing in particular I'm hoping to include. > > Looking forward to ditching JDK 7 :) > > > > -- > > Michael Mior > > [email protected] > > > > 2017-11-13 22:46 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde <[email protected]>: > > > > Last release (1.14) was on 2nd October. I think we should aim for a > > release 1.15 in early December (which means starting an RC vote around > > November 27), and I volunteer to be release manager. > > > > Does this timing work for everyone? > > > > Any particular features that people would like to include? > > > > I would like to announce that this will be the last release that will > > support JDK 7[1]. > > > > Julian > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
