+1 Good report, Francis. You have accurately described the challenges we have
faced with the onslaught of PRs and how we have risen to the challenge.
> On Apr 1, 2019, at 6:01 PM, Michael Mior wrote:
>
> Looks good Francis! Doesn't need to be in the report, but I do like
> that I can now
Looks good Francis! Doesn't need to be in the report, but I do like
that I can now easily rebase and merge PRs right from the GitHub web
interface after seeing passing Travis tests. For smallish PRs, I find
that means I don't even need to check out a copy of the code.
--
Michael Mior
Good catch, Stamatis! The bit about PRs on Github does seem silly.
Updated report as attached:
## Description:
Apache Calcite is a highly customizable framework for parsing and
planning queries on data in a wide variety of formats. It allows
database-like access, and in particular a SQL
Thanks Francis! Two minor things:
3 committers -> 4 committers
enabling new contributors to easily submit pull requests via Github -> I
don't see how is this related. Contributors could submit PRs through Github
even before.
Στις Τρί, 2 Απρ 2019 στις 12:35 π.μ., ο/η Francis Chuang <
Attached below is a draft of this month's board report. Please let me
know if you have any additions or corrections.
## Description:
Apache Calcite is a highly customizable framework for parsing and
planning queries on data in a wide variety of formats. It allows
database-like access, and in
