Re: Job postings on the dev list ?

2021-10-30 Thread Stamatis Zampetakis
Hello,

If somebody ends up sending here it most likely means that they did their
research and the position is relevant for this public.
I don't worry too much about getting spammed since even j...@apache.org
that is made for this is rather low volume.
Receiving job posts here might also tell us where Calcite is (will be) used
and what our colleagues are working on, both of which I find interesting.

Personally, I wouldn't insist on some guidelines but rather leave it in
common sense.
Even if something completely irrelevant comes from time to time I can
simply ignore it.

Best,
Stamatis


On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:19 PM Julian Hyde  wrote:

>
>
> > On Oct 29, 2021, at 11:15 AM, Michael Mior  wrote:
> >
> > Somewhat off-topic, but I think your characterization of recruiting as
> > a zero sum game misses out on the candidate. Presumably a candidate
> > takes a new position because they benefit in some way.
>
> Yes, that’s valid. My characterization of it as a zero-sum game was a
> little over broad. I was bringing in my frustrations at having to be
> perpetually recruiting.
>
> Julian
>
>


Re: Job postings on the dev list ?

2021-10-29 Thread Julian Hyde



> On Oct 29, 2021, at 11:15 AM, Michael Mior  wrote:
> 
> Somewhat off-topic, but I think your characterization of recruiting as
> a zero sum game misses out on the candidate. Presumably a candidate
> takes a new position because they benefit in some way.

Yes, that’s valid. My characterization of it as a zero-sum game was a little 
over broad. I was bringing in my frustrations at having to be perpetually 
recruiting.

Julian



Re: Job postings on the dev list ?

2021-10-29 Thread Michael Mior
Those guidelines sound good to me.

Somewhat off-topic, but I think your characterization of recruiting as
a zero sum game misses out on the candidate. Presumably a candidate
takes a new position because they benefit in some way. That said, if
someone really wants to find good candidates, having an engineer reach
out on a dev mailing list seems more appropriate than getting a
recruiter to do it.

--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org

Le ven. 29 oct. 2021 à 13:48, Julian Hyde  a écrit :
>
> I think Apache has some kind of policy on this, but I couldn’t find a link.
>
> It’s a difficult question. If a company making a big investment in Calcite 
> (say rewriting their engine’s query optimizer) then it is good for Calcite if 
> someone is able to get a full-time job working on it. But we don’t want the 
> lists to fill up with spam job postings where SQL is one of twenty skills and 
> the person will probably end up writing JavaScript.
>
> There's a continuum between those points, I can’t find a simple way to draw a 
> line between “good” and “bad". Here are some guidelines that might work:
>
>  * Jobs must be primarily working on Calcite
>  * We prefer posts by people who have merit in our community
>  * Absolutely no posts by recruiters
>
> In my opinion, software recruiting is often a zero-sum game (when company X 
> lures an employee from company Y, X wins and Y loses, and the recruiters take 
> a slice). I don’t want to make that merry-go-round spin any faster. A “win” 
> for Calcite would be when somebody moves from a job where they use Calcite 
> part-time to a higher paying job where they use Calcite full-time. Our 
> mailing list should enable those kinds of wins.
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On Oct 29, 2021, at 8:28 AM, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I wanted to ask what members of this list think about receiving / posting
> > job opportunities (related to query optimisation / database engine) to
> > calcite-dev ?
> >
> > Is it an appropriate usage of the dev@ list ? Should one use a different
> > channel ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrei.
>


Re: Job postings on the dev list ?

2021-10-29 Thread Julian Hyde
I think Apache has some kind of policy on this, but I couldn’t find a link.

It’s a difficult question. If a company making a big investment in Calcite (say 
rewriting their engine’s query optimizer) then it is good for Calcite if 
someone is able to get a full-time job working on it. But we don’t want the 
lists to fill up with spam job postings where SQL is one of twenty skills and 
the person will probably end up writing JavaScript.

There's a continuum between those points, I can’t find a simple way to draw a 
line between “good” and “bad". Here are some guidelines that might work:

 * Jobs must be primarily working on Calcite
 * We prefer posts by people who have merit in our community
 * Absolutely no posts by recruiters

In my opinion, software recruiting is often a zero-sum game (when company X 
lures an employee from company Y, X wins and Y loses, and the recruiters take a 
slice). I don’t want to make that merry-go-round spin any faster. A “win” for 
Calcite would be when somebody moves from a job where they use Calcite 
part-time to a higher paying job where they use Calcite full-time. Our mailing 
list should enable those kinds of wins. 

Julian


> On Oct 29, 2021, at 8:28 AM, Andrei Sereda  wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I wanted to ask what members of this list think about receiving / posting
> job opportunities (related to query optimisation / database engine) to
> calcite-dev ?
> 
> Is it an appropriate usage of the dev@ list ? Should one use a different
> channel ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrei.



Job postings on the dev list ?

2021-10-29 Thread Andrei Sereda
Hello,

I wanted to ask what members of this list think about receiving / posting
job opportunities (related to query optimisation / database engine) to
calcite-dev ?

Is it an appropriate usage of the dev@ list ? Should one use a different
channel ?

Thanks,
Andrei.