[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3763) Update Camel features descriptor to be Karaf 2.2.0 compliant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006340#comment-13006340 ] Jean-Baptiste Onofré commented on CAMEL-3763: - Hi Willem, we are agree with

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3784) Upgrade to Jetty 7.3.1.v20110307

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13006343#comment-13006343 ] Willem Jiang commented on CAMEL-3784: - I just upgrade the Jetty version run some test

[jira] Updated: (CAMEL-3784) Upgrade to Jetty 7.3.1.v20110307

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Willem Jiang updated CAMEL-3784: Fix Version/s: (was: 2.7.0) Upgrade to Jetty 7.3.1.v20110307

Re: [PROPOSAL]

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi, It could make sense for the Camel 2.7. For 2.1.x Karaf compliant features descriptor, the main changes are: - the name of the jetty feature and jetty version used - the avoid of resolver I will add this

Re: [PROPOSAL]

Hi Claus, Thanks for the update. I will work on it with Willem. I will keep you posted soon. Regards JB On 03/14/2011 02:05 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofréj...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi, It could make sense for the Camel 2.7. For 2.1.x Karaf

Re: [PROPOSAL]

If that's the case, this looks to me like not very useful. I am not against it, but it seems like a nice to have unnecessary effort. Users can use 2.6.0 with karaf 2.1.x. Since in 2.7.0 we break compatibility with so many technologies, like Java 1.5. and Spring 2.5.x, to me Karaf 2.1.x is just

Re: [PROPOSAL]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote: If that's the case, this looks to me like not very useful. I am not against it, but it seems like a nice to have unnecessary effort. Users can use 2.6.0 with karaf 2.1.x. Since in 2.7.0 we break compatibility with so

Re: [PROPOSAL]

Agree Hadrian, I think it's more logical to have: - Camel 2.7 supports only Karaf 2.2.x - ServiceMix 4.4.0 (powered by Karaf 2.2.x) will ship Camel 2.7 - if users want to stay with Karaf 2.1.x, they have to use Camel 2.6 It sounds like a good plan for me :) Regards JB On 03/14/2011 03:55 PM,