We do not need any docs, its not for development its for users that
can patch camel-quarkus in production
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 7:43 PM David Jencks wrote:
>
> What’s going to happen about docs? There are no 2.2.x docs at the moment…. I
> assumed 2.2.x was obsolete and unsupported. Given
Hi Cameleers,
I do think that it's not ideal to break the website build, but also I
don't think it's avoidable. I don't think it's a big issue if the
website fails to build -- I consider the build more as a gating check;
and to that end we didn't publish a broken website for the community.
And I
Hi Cameleers,
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 6:07 AM David Jencks wrote:
> — you have to build the site locally to see the built page that shows the
> problem. Maybe Zoran knows a way, but I don’t know how to see the CI built
> site if the build broke.
We could, both on Jenkins* and on GitHub
Indeed, very nice work, David. Thank you!
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:07 PM David Jencks
wrote:
> The spring-boot completeness check is a complicated thing…. Antora isn’t
> really designed to run IT tests :-)
>
> Do you have any suggestions about how to make fixing such problems easier
> or
What’s going to happen about docs? There are no 2.2.x docs at the moment…. I
assumed 2.2.x was obsolete and unsupported. Given the length of time they have
been missing, making them work will take some effort.
David Jencks
> On Jan 13, 2022, at 3:46 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:32 AM Peter Palaga wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is a heads up that we are preparing the release of Camel Quarkus
> 2.2.1 these days.
>
> The main motivation was to fix the recent Log4j vulnerabilities in the
> Camel Quarkus branch based on Camel 3.14 LTS. Backporting those
Hi,
this is a heads up that we are preparing the release of Camel Quarkus
2.2.1 these days.
The main motivation was to fix the recent Log4j vulnerabilities in the
Camel Quarkus branch based on Camel 3.14 LTS. Backporting those fixes,
we told ourselves to backport a bit more fixes to have a
