Re: camel-openapi-java supports OpenAPI 3.0 or 3.1?

Thanks Claus, I open https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-20181 for tracking On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:37 AM Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > It should support both, and it may be that the code need to check for 3.0 > vs 3.1 in that [2]. I assume there is a Json30 and Json31 for each version >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 3.2.3

Hi everyone, The vote passes with 6 +1 binding votes: * Claus Ibsen * Alexandre Gallice * Andrea Cosentino * Jean-Baptiste Onofré * Zineb Bendhiba * James Netherton And 3 +1 non-binding votes: * Claudio Miranda * Gaëlle Fournier * Zheng Feng I will release the staging repository shortly.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 3.2.3

Thanks everyone for voting. This is my +1 (non-binding). On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 6:36 PM James Netherton wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks! > > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 07:54, Zheng Feng wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel Quarkus 3.2.3. > > > > Highlights: > > > > *

Re: camel-openapi-java supports OpenAPI 3.0 or 3.1?

Hi It should support both, and it may be that the code need to check for 3.0 vs 3.1 in that [2]. I assume there is a Json30 and Json31 for each version of the spec. On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 12:55 PM Zheng Feng wrote: > Hi, > > I was working on CAMEL-20156 >

camel-openapi-java supports OpenAPI 3.0 or 3.1?

Hi, I was working on CAMEL-20156 and camel-quarkus issue #5559 . I found that all of our tests are against the OpenAPI 3.0 result by using "io.swagger.v3.core.util.Json.pretty(openApi3)" , see