It sounds like most found the plain text email that Josh sent out yesterday
palatable, so I'll do the same. As always, feedback is welcome.
testall:
All pass! (again)
=
dtest:
scrub_test.TestScrubIndexes.test_standalone_scrub
CASSANDRA-12337, new flaky
I am more -0 at this point, because I think we need to get our priorities
straight before even talking about dates and releases, that's why I wrote that
I agree with Sylvain.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> Also I believe Pavel may have switched
Also I believe Pavel may have switched tacitly to -1 with his "I agree with
Sylvain" email?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> I change my vote to -1.
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko
>> w
I change my vote to -1.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko
> wrote:
>
> > 1. Release 3.8 as is now. It’s an even preview release that can live fine
> > with one minor annoyance on upgrade. Have 3.9 released on schedule.
>
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko
wrote:
> 1. Release 3.8 as is now. It’s an even preview release that can live fine
> with one minor annoyance on upgrade. Have 3.9 released on schedule.
> Since the vote technically passed, we can just do it, now.
>
> 2. Wait until #12236 is in,
Thank you all. Since I dug through the thread, I count 3 binding +1, 4
binding -1, and 2 non-binding +1 votes :)
brandon +1 pmc
jake+1 pmc changed: -1
josh+1
alexsey +1 pmc changed: -1
pavel +1 pmc
robert +1
dave+1 pmc
sylvain -1 pmc
jonathan-1 pm
Agreed, option #2 is my preference as well.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Dave Brosius
wrote:
> Option Two seems reasonable to me
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> On 2016-07-28 14:47, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote:
>
>> Jake was just swapping his vote +1 to -1.
>>
>> Swapping mine to -1 too, so that we have a bi
Option Two seems reasonable to me
---
On 2016-07-28 14:47, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote:
Jake was just swapping his vote +1 to -1.
Swapping mine to -1 too, so that we have a binding -1 majority now.
Let’s get #12236 in and then decide what to do.
--
AY
On 28 July 2016 at 19:46:56, Benedict El
Jake was just swapping his vote +1 to -1.
Swapping mine to -1 too, so that we have a binding -1 majority now.
Let’s get #12236 in and then decide what to do.
--
AY
On 28 July 2016 at 19:46:56, Benedict Elliott Smith (bened...@apache.org) wrote:
I think -1 lacks a little clarity when respondin
Apologies, I was just changing my release vote to -1 from +1
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Benedict Elliott Smith wrote:
> I think -1 lacks a little clarity when responding to a block of prose with
> multiple clauses, suggestions and no single proposition requiring a yes/no
> answer.
>
> As f
I think -1 lacks a little clarity when responding to a block of prose with
multiple clauses, suggestions and no single proposition requiring a yes/no
answer.
As fun as it is to type -1.
On Thursday, 28 July 2016, Jake Luciani > wrote:
> -1
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko
-1
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko
wrote:
> Let me sum up my thoughts so far.
>
> Some of the most important goals of tick-tock were 1) predictable, regular
> releases with manageable changesets and
> 2)individual releases that are more stable than in our previous process.
>
>
Let me sum up my thoughts so far.
Some of the most important goals of tick-tock were 1) predictable, regular
releases with manageable changesets and
2)individual releases that are more stable than in our previous process.
Now, we’ve already slipped a few times. Most recently with 3.6, and now w
13 matches
Mail list logo