[RELEASE] Apache Cassandra 3.9 released

The Cassandra team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Cassandra version 3.9. Apache Cassandra is a fully distributed database. It is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance. http://cassandra.apache.org/ Downloads of source and

[RELEASE] Apache Cassandra 3.8 released

The Cassandra team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Cassandra version 3.8. Apache Cassandra is a fully distributed database. It is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance. http://cassandra.apache.org/ Downloads of source and

Re: A home for 4.0

Thanks Sylvain - since we have a few new folks, can you poke the docs on committing to include a bit about the merge order? On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Michael Shuler wrote: > Thanks! To clarify, yes, I was just being silly. We mostly use the > base.version in

[VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Cassandra 3.9

The votes were 8 +1 binding, 1 +1 non-binding, and no -1 votes. I will get the release published. -- Kind regards, Michael (with RESULT subject, this time) On 09/26/2016 10:12 AM, Michael Shuler wrote: > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.9. > > sha1:

Re: A home for 4.0

And of course I've been retarded and created a '3.X' branch with is completely inconsistent with our usual branch naming. So I actually just renamed that to 'cassandra-3.X' instead. I apologize for the inconvenience if any (there hasn't been any commit since I created the branch though, so

Re: A home for 4.0

So, this is done now and I've renamed the version on trunk to 4.0, so be sure to commit/merge to 3.X before going to trunk from now on. On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > As there has been no strong objection, I'm going to proceed and create the >

Re: A home for 4.0

As there has been no strong objection, I'm going to proceed and create the branch. Note that I'm discarding Michael remark as a joke due to the use of a smiley, but just in case that was a genuine concern, I'll argue that 1) 'trunk' isn't really more arithmetic friendly so I don't think there is