1. Is it worth giving up local latencies to get full global consistency? Most
LWT use cases use
LOCAL_SERIAL.
This isn’t a tradeoff that needs to be made. There’s nothing about Accord that
prevents performing consensus in one DC and replicating the writes to others.
That’s not in scope for the
I'll read more of this in a bit, I want to make sure I fully digest it
before commenting on the rest, but this block here deserves a few words:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 9:54 AM Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> After putting the above together it seems to
> me that the two main areas of tradeoff are, 1.
* Hi all,After calling several times for a broader discussion of goals and
tradeoffs around transaction management in the CEP-15 thread, I’ve put
together a short analysis to kick that off.Here is a table that summarizes
the state of the art for distributed transactions that offer
serializability,
> With the proposal hitting the one-month mark, the contributors are interested
> in gauging the developer community's response to the proposal.
I support this proposal. From what I can understand, this proposal
moves us towards having the building blocks we need to correctly
deliver some of the
