Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-06 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
Not much to add really, but just to close the loop, responses inline. On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 11:58 AM Benedict Elliott Smith wrote: > Thanks for the feedback and further questions. I’m sure there will be > more, particularly around permissions and roles, so it’s good to get some > of these

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-06 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> Summary: > > 1: Component. (A) Multi-select; (B) Cascading-select > 2: Labels: leave alone +1/-1 > 3: No workflow changes for first/second review: +1/-1 > 4: Priorities: Including High +1/-1 > 5: Mandatory Platform and Feature: +1/-1 > 6: Remove Environment field: +1/-1 > 1: A 2: +1

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-06 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
> >> Summary: >> >> 1: Component. (A) Multi-select; (B) Cascading-select >> 2: Labels: leave alone +1/-1 >> 3: No workflow changes for first/second review: +1/-1 >> 4: Priorities: Including High +1/-1 >> 5: Mandatory Platform and Feature: +1/-1 >> 6: Remove Environment field: +1/-1 >> > > 1:

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-06 Thread Sam Tunnicliffe
1: A 2: +1 3: +1 4: +1 5: +0 6: +1 On the question of keeping the contributors-only restriction on moving from Triage->Open, I tend to agree with Benedict that a low barrier can be useful in deterring bogus transitions (accidental or malicious) which keeps the general noise down. I’m thinking

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-06 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
Thanks everyone for your feedback so far! I think we have a pretty strong consensus for the first questions. I will follow-up later with a new poll; hopefully this will be the last round, so if you have any more questions that haven’t been aired, please do bring them up now. 1: A (+9) 2: +8