Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.1.21

2019-02-06 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 Den ons 6 feb. 2019 kl 10:54 skrev Benedict Elliott Smith < bened...@apache.org>: > +1, and also see no point in EOL; if we have failed to back port something > important, we should rectify it. > > > On 6 Feb 2019, at 05:09, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > > > > +1 (to the release, I see no reason to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.18

2019-02-06 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 Den ons 6 feb. 2019 kl 10:53 skrev Benedict Elliott Smith < bened...@apache.org>: > +1 > > > On 6 Feb 2019, at 08:01, Tommy Stendahl > wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > /Tommy > > > > On lör, 2019-02-02 at 18:32 -0600, Michael Shuler wrote: > > > > I propose the following artifacts for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.2.14

2019-02-06 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 Den ons 6 feb. 2019 kl 10:53 skrev Benedict Elliott Smith < bened...@apache.org>: > +1 > > > On 6 Feb 2019, at 05:09, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 4:32 PM Michael Shuler > > wrote: > > > >> I propose the following artifacts for release as 2.2.14. > >> > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.4

2019-02-06 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 Den ons 6 feb. 2019 kl 10:52 skrev Benedict Elliott Smith < bened...@apache.org>: > +1 > > > On 6 Feb 2019, at 08:01, Tommy Stendahl > wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > /Tommy > > > > On lör, 2019-02-02 at 18:31 -0600, Michael Shuler wrote: > > > > I propose the following artifacts for

Re: [VOTE] Change Jira Workflow

2018-12-17 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:19:07PM +, Benedict Elliott Smith wrote: > I propose these changes > * > to the Jira Workflow for the project. The vote will be open for 72 hours**. > > I am, of course, +1. > > *

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-12 Thread Marcus Eriksson
1. D C B A E 2. B C A 3. A 4. -0.5, leaning towards remove but don't really care On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 06:42:09PM +, Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote: > 1. C, D, A, B, E > 2. B, C, A > 3. A > 4. Meh > > > On 11 Dec 2018, at 16:28, Benedict Elliott Smith > > wrote: > > > > Just to re-summarise

Re: Cassandra 4.0 (Trunk) - "ant artifacts" does not create binary tarball

2018-11-12 Thread Marcus Eriksson
In trunk you need to provide JAVA_HOME to both java8 and java11, like this for example; $ JAVA8_HOME= JAVA_HOME= ant artifacts /Marcus On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:21:10AM +, Steinmaurer, Thomas wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to start with some first C* 4.0 experiments, thus tried to

Re: Moving tickets out of 4.0 post freeze

2018-09-24 Thread Marcus Eriksson
ok, I guess I should read properly, we should only fix bugs On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:42 PM Marcus Eriksson wrote: > I have used the 4.0 version as a "we need this before releasing 4.0" - do > you have another way of marking tickets we need fixed before releasing? > > On

Re: Moving tickets out of 4.0 post freeze

2018-09-24 Thread Marcus Eriksson
I have used the 4.0 version as a "we need this before releasing 4.0" - do you have another way of marking tickets we need fixed before releasing? On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 2:09 PM Joshua McKenzie wrote: > We have quite a few tickets still flagged for 4.0 that aren't in keeping > with the idea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.17 (Take 2)

2018-07-26 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 5:03 AM Vinay Chella wrote: > +1 nb. > > Here are the test results. > https://circleci.com/gh/vinaykumarchella/cassandra/tree/3.0.17_tentative > > Most of the failed tests are related to snapshot_test.TestArchiveCommitlog. > > Regards, > Vinay Chella > > > On Thu, Jul

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.3 (Take 2)

2018-07-26 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 4:59 AM Vinay Chella wrote: > +1 nb. > > Here are the failed tests (circleci > < > https://circleci.com/gh/vinaykumarchella/workflows/cassandra/tree/3.11.3_tentative > >), > if anyone is curious about failed tests. > > dtests-no-vnodes (5 Failed tests) >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.2.13

2018-07-26 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:05 AM kurt greaves wrote: > +1 nb > > On Fri., 27 Jul. 2018, 00:20 Sam Tunnicliffe, wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On 25 July 2018 at 08:17, Michael Shuler wrote: > > > > > I propose the following artifacts for release as 2.2.13. > > > > > > sha1:

Re: RangeAwareCompaction for manual token management

2018-07-22 Thread Marcus Eriksson
It should work fine with num_tokens: 1 Without vnodes it also flushes to per-range sstables (if you have RF=3 you will "always" get 3 sstables after flush), while with vnodes it groups the ranges and flushes a full disk, so if you have a single data_file_directories you get only one sstable, then

Re: [VOTE] Branching Change for 4.0 Freeze

2018-07-12 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:37 AM Jeff Jirsa wrote: > +1 > > > -- > Jeff Jirsa > > > > On Jul 11, 2018, at 2:46 PM, sankalp kohli > wrote: > > > > Hi, > >As discussed in the thread[1], we are proposing that we will not > branch > > on 1st September but will only allow following merges

Re: Testing 4.0 Post-Freeze

2018-07-10 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 here as well On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 7:06 PM Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote: > +1 from me too. > > — > AY > > On 10 July 2018 at 04:17:26, Mick Semb Wever (m...@apache.org) wrote: > > > > We have done all this for previous releases and we know it has not > worked > > well. So how giving it one

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.2.12

2018-02-13 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Gary Dusbabek wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Michael Shuler > wrote: > > > I propose the following artifacts for release as 2.2.12. > > > > sha1: 1602e606348959aead18531cb8027afb15f276e7 > > Git:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.1.20

2018-02-13 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote: > +1 > > — > AY > > On 12 February 2018 at 20:30:58, Michael Shuler (mich...@pbandjelly.org) > wrote: > > I propose the following artifacts for release as 2.1.20. > > sha1: b2949439ec62077128103540e42570238520f4ee

Re: [VOTE] (Take 2) Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.2

2018-02-13 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote: > +1 > > — > AY > > On 13 February 2018 at 03:41:09, Michael Shuler (mich...@pbandjelly.org) > wrote: > > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.11.2. > > sha1: 8a5e88f635fdb984505a99a553b5799cedccd06d

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.16

2018-02-13 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote: > +1 > > — > AY > > On 12 February 2018 at 20:31:23, Michael Shuler (mich...@pbandjelly.org) > wrote: > > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.0.16. > > sha1: 91e83c72de109521074b14a8eeae1309c3b1f215

Proposal: github pull requests for all code changes

2017-12-12 Thread Marcus Eriksson
To be able to use the github code review UI and closer CI integration we should make it obligatory to submit github pull requests for all code changes. The process would be: 1. Create or find a JIRA ticket 2. Submit GH pull request - one PR per branch (one for 3.0, one for 3.11 etc) -

Re: Do it need to run 'nodetool upgradesstables' when updating from 2.0.9 to 2.1.19?

2017-10-13 Thread Marcus Eriksson
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10990 On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Per Otterström wrote: > Hepp! > > Just to be clear, I'm not claiming this to be the case, it is a sincere > question. My team is planning an upgrade from 2.2 to 3.0 which is why

Re: Proposal to retroactively mark materialized views experimental

2017-10-01 Thread Marcus Eriksson
t; experimental to stable? > > We should remove the flag as soon as we’re (collectively) confident in a > feature’s behavior - at least correctness, if not performance. > > > > On Sep 29, 2017, at 10:31 PM, Marcus Eriksson <krum...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >

Re: Proposal to retroactively mark materialized views experimental

2017-09-29 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 on marking MVs experimental, but should there be some point in the future where we consider removing them from the code base unless they have gotten significant improvement as well? We probably need to enforce some kind of process for adding new experimental features in the future - perhaps a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.2.11

2017-09-29 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Vinay Chella wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Josh McKenzie > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Aleksey Yeshchenko > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.1.19

2017-09-29 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Vinay Chella wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:38 PM, Josh McKenzie > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Aleksey Yeshchenko > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > >

Re: STCS in L0 behaviour

2016-11-24 Thread Marcus Eriksson
The reason is described here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5371?focusedCommentId=13621679=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13621679 /Marcus On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > What you’re

Re: Compaction strategy contribution

2016-07-12 Thread Marcus Eriksson
Any code specific questions can be asked here or in #cassandra-dev on freenode. Discussion regarding usefulness etc is probably best to keep in a JIRA ticket. /Marcus On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Pedro Gordo wrote: > Hi all > > I'm finishing an MSc in which my

Re: Compaction Filter in Cassandra

2016-03-12 Thread Marcus Eriksson
We don't have anything like that, do you have a specific use case in mind? Could you create a JIRA ticket and we can discuss there? /Marcus On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Dikang Gu wrote: > Hello there, > > RocksDB has the feature called "Compaction Filter" to allow

Re: Proposal: release 2.2 (based on current trunk) before 3.0 (based on 8099)

2015-05-12 Thread Marcus Eriksson
We should get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8568 in 2.2 as well (it is patch avail and I'll get it reviewed this week) /Marcus On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds good. I will add the new version to Jira. Planned tickets to block

Re: March 2015 QA retrospective

2015-04-13 Thread Marcus Eriksson
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Ariel Weisberg ariel.weisb...@datastax.com wrote: Hi Marcus, CASSANDRA-8211 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8211 Overlapping sstables in L1+ So the question I would ask is would the workload that reproduces this specific bug be interesting

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.0.12

2015-01-11 Thread Marcus Eriksson
regression introduced in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8329 - fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8562 - could we include that? On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote: +1 On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Aleksey

Re: Reminder: 68 patches pending review

2014-10-02 Thread Marcus Eriksson
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Pavel Yaskevich pove...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jonathan, I have commented on 7885 and can take something of Yuki or Marcus if they don't mind. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7872 perhaps? /Marcus

Re: Pointers on writing your own Compaction Strategy

2014-09-04 Thread Marcus Eriksson
1. create a class that extends AbstractCompactionStrategy (i would keep it in-tree while developing to avoid having classpath issues etc) 2. Implement the abstract methods - getNextBackgroundTask - called when cassandra wants to do a new minor (background) compaction - return a CompactionTask

Re: Proposed changes to C* Release Schedule

2014-06-18 Thread Marcus Eriksson
I totally understand where you are coming from, I've been in the same situation before, but; In my experience the only time you want new features in your database is during development, once the application you built is in production and stable you really _never_ want to upgrade the db until

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.1.0-rc1

2014-06-02 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Brandon Williams dri...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote: We've fixed all the bugs we had open for 2.1 so it's time to move on towards the final release. I thus propose the following

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.2.15

2014-02-05 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.comwrote: We just released 1.2.14 but unfortunately it shipped with a relatively serious regression: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6648. That regression has been fixed, but we need to get that fix to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.0.5 (Strike 3)

2014-02-05 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.comwrote: As said while closing the previous vote, we needed to re-roll for CASSANDRA-6648, so I propose the following artifacts for release as 2.0.5. I also propose an expedited 24h vote. sha1:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.0.5 (Strike 2)

2014-02-03 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.comwrote: With typo introduced by CASSANDRA-6505 fixed, I propose the following artifacts for release as 2.0.5. sha1: b71372146135fdcee6353ec8254ebfd87c42f907 Git:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.2.14

2014-01-31 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.comwrote: I propose the following artifacts for release as 1.2.14. sha1: 6a9314408cbd69ce26c2ba04bf49df7809a911bf Git: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/1.2.14-tentative

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.0.0-beta1

2013-07-09 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.comwrote: Cassandra 2.0 is coming along but we now need wider testing. So I propose the following artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta1. Let it be clear that it is only a beta (and the first one at that), so we know it's

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.2.6 (Strike 3)

2013-06-25 Thread Marcus Eriksson
very nice, dtests win +1 On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Michael Kjellman mkjell...@barracuda.comwrote: I know non members aren¹t supposed to comment on these votes, but I was actually throwing 1.2.6 Strike 2ish into production when 3/4 of the way thru I got Jason¹s email as I was

Re: Time to roll 1.1.12?

2013-05-22 Thread Marcus Eriksson
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote: * fsync leveled manifest to avoid corruption (CASSANDRA-5535) you sure that this does not have performance impact? most filesystems sync all their data not just one file. write to .new file and then do rename. should be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.2.5 (strike 3)

2013-05-16 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.comwrote: Hopefully third times the charm. The #4860 fix has been committed so I propose the following artifacts for release as 1.2.5. sha1: 7d4380d661e7bbf3ec075b069cf2c22e9b87375f Git:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.2.5 (strike 2)

2013-05-07 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Carl Yeksigian c...@yeksigian.com wrote: +1 On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote: Now that the offending tickets have been committed (#5432 and #5535), let's re-roll this. So I propose the following artifacts

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.2.5

2013-05-04 Thread Marcus Eriksson
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5535 got in as well /Marcus On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.comwrote: On May 3, 2013 10:10 PM, Brandon Williams dri...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5432

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.2.4

2013-04-09 Thread Marcus Eriksson
+1 On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.comwrote: A fair enough number of bugs fixed since 1.2.3, I propose the following artifacts for release as 1.2.4. sha1: 2e96d07114dc88f85e56d88f7322a6b91da36c0d Git:

Re: Question about the way that isLocalDc() gets local DC

2013-02-28 Thread Marcus Eriksson
that should probably be FBUtilities.getBroadCastAddress even, could you file a ticket? On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Michal Michalski mich...@opera.com wrote: I have a C* sourcecode related question: Can someone explain me why isLocalDc() in OutboundTcpConnection class uses