Re: [VOTE] Apache Cayenne 4.2.M3 release

2021-06-09 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Interesting. Being Apache old-timers, we haven't reviewed the LICENSE/NOTICE requirements in a bit. So looks like we may need 2 separate LICENSE files for source and binary distros: 1. The source one should exclude the following licenses: CAUCHO, JGOODIES, OGNL, VPP, jEdit Syntax, Inflector

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cayenne 4.2.M3 release

2021-06-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Interesting. Being Apache old-timers, we haven't reviewed the LICENSE/NOTICE > requirements in a bit. So looks like we may need 2 separate LICENSE files for > source and binary distros That is how a lot of projects handle it yes. > I don't see anything about including LICENSE/NOTICE in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cayenne 4.2.M3 release

2021-06-09 Thread Andrus Adamchik
> On Jun 9, 2021, at 12:53 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > >> >> I don't see anything about including LICENSE/NOTICE in .jar files anymore >> (we do include them). > > Yep that still needed last I looked. Makes sense. Also since the rule is "license must match what's in the artifact", we