On 2025/8/4 03:16, Pepijn Noltes wrote:
## Community Health:
Communication and development activity are in decline, but this could be
temporary. One of the challenges is the next release, we have decided to make
this a major (breaking) release but this also entails a lot needed change
before a b
Hi All,
I posted the board report.
Greetings,
Pepijn
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:01 AM Pepijn Noltes wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> It is board report time again. If you have any comments/remark feel
> free to let us known.
> I am a bit late with the board report this time, so if there are any
> commen
Hi All,
I posted the board report.
Greetings,
Pepijn
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 5:47 PM erjan altena wrote:
>
> Also a +1 from me.
>
> Op do 11 jul. 2019 22:33 schreef Konstantin Boudnik :
>
> > +1
> >
> > On July 11, 2019 12:36:50 PM PDT, Pepijn Noltes
> > wrote:
> > >Hi All,
> > >
> > >It is ti
Also a +1 from me.
Op do 11 jul. 2019 22:33 schreef Konstantin Boudnik :
> +1
>
> On July 11, 2019 12:36:50 PM PDT, Pepijn Noltes
> wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >It is time again for the board report. Please feel free to add any
> >comments/remarks.
> >
> >Greetings,
> >Pepijn
> >
> >## Description:
+1
On July 11, 2019 12:36:50 PM PDT, Pepijn Noltes wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>It is time again for the board report. Please feel free to add any
>comments/remarks.
>
>Greetings,
>Pepijn
>
>## Description:
> - Dynamic service framework for C and C++
>
>## Issues:
> - It has been over a year since the last
LGTM +1
Roy
Op do 11 jul. 2019 om 21:37 schreef Pepijn Noltes
> Hi All,
>
> It is time again for the board report. Please feel free to add any
> comments/remarks.
>
> Greetings,
> Pepijn
>
> ## Description:
> - Dynamic service framework for C and C++
>
> ## Issues:
> - It has been over a year
Hi All,
I posted the board report for Celix.
Greetings,
Pepijn
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:42 PM Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> +1
> I don't really think board is interested in JIRA activities, but it
> won't harm anyone too ;)
Thxs for the reaction ;)
> --
> Take care,
> Konstantin (Cos) Bou
+1
I don't really think board is interested in JIRA activities, but it
won't harm anyone too ;)
--
Take care,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the vie
Big +1.
Thanks for picking this up again!
2016-07-12 21:11 GMT+02:00 Pepijn Noltes :
> Hi All,
>
> It is reporting time again. See the draft report below, any remarks /
> questions are welcome.
>
> ## Description:
> - OSGi framework implementation in C.
>
> ## Issues:
> - there are no issues
Hi Pepijn,
Thanks for the report, I've added it to the agenda for the next meeting.
Sorry for not responding earlier, have been busy with some other private
things.
2016-04-11 21:22 GMT+02:00 Pepijn Noltes :
> Hi All,
>
> It is reporting time again. See the draft report below, any remarks /
> q
Thanks for the report! I've added it to the board meetings agenda.
2016-01-12 20:20 GMT+01:00 Pepijn Noltes :
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for the input.
>
> @Alexander: Could you upload to report?
>
> Updated report is:
> ## Description: OSGi framework implementation in C.
>
> ## Issues:
> - there are
Hi All,
Thanks for the input.
@Alexander: Could you upload to report?
Updated report is:
## Description: OSGi framework implementation in C.
## Issues:
- there are no issues requiring board attention at this time
## Activity:
- Preparation for next release is ongoing. An alpha tag has been c
Hi All,
Maybe then also add the scoped topology manager
as well as the enabled address sanitizer build and the
coverity support?
Regards,
Bjoern
On 11.01.2016 19:57, Gerrit Binnenmars wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> For Activity
> Please explicitly mention the following activities for the release (i
Hello All,
For Activity
Please explicitly mention the following activities for the release (if
not mentioned in the previous report).
- Code coverage significantly improved
- Configuration admin bundle added
- Dependency manager significantly improved
- RSA DFI added
- Celix bootstrap will be u
Thanks for the work Pepijn!
I've added the report to the board meeting agenda.
2015-10-12 20:52 GMT+02:00 Pepijn Noltes :
> @Gerrit: thanks for the additions.
>
> For who is interested, you can find the apachecon and Bits&Chips sheets at
>
> http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/s
@Gerrit: thanks for the additions.
For who is interested, you can find the apachecon and Bits&Chips sheets at
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/ApacheCon%202015.pdf
and
http://www.inaetics.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/SmartSystemsRefImplementation.pdf
Hereby the resul
Hello,
Suggest following additions:
Activity: Apache Celix presented as part of INAETICS technology stack at
Bits&Chips SmartSystems
Activity: On-going work to get Apache Celix running on Android. Actually it
is running but not released yet (separate branch)
Greetings Gerrit
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015
Sounds good te me! I have no additions, good to see the activity! I've seen
a lot of fixes and commits passing by.
Thanks for picking up the report Pepijn!
2015-10-08 12:25 GMT+02:00 Pepijn Noltes :
> Hi All,
>
> It is reporting time again. See the report below, any remarks /
> questions are we
Hello All,
The discussion (maybe a big word) is started in the response of the Travis
CI. Sorry, for not starting a new topic. Please have a look there. I agree
with the last mail from Bjorn.
Gerrit
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> I'd like to second Marcel's and Cos'
I'd like to second Marcel's and Cos' points: lets add blurb about that
discussion and better yet lets make sure to push those types of
discussions in the open.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Are these discussions happen here on the list or off-line? If
Are these discussions happen here on the list or off-line? If the latter then
it make sense to post the gist of it for the community's benefits.
Cos
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:43AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
> Maybe it’s worth mentioning that there is some ongoing discussion on how to
> create more
Maybe it’s worth mentioning that there is some ongoing discussion on how to
create more frequent releases.
On 6 Jul 2015 at 23:46:01, Alexander Broekhuis (a.broekh...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi all,
It's reporting time again. Please supply some info that can be added, if
any of course :).
Th
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> I've updated the report. Please take a look, if all is ok, I'll post it
> this evening or tomorrow. I've also added some in-line comments below.
>
>
> Celix is an OSGi like implementation in C with a distinct focus on
> interoperabi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Looks good to me.
Regards,
Erik
On 09-02-15 09:32, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
> I've updated the report. Please take a look, if all is ok, I'll
> post it this evening or tomorrow. I've also added some in-line
> comments below.
>
> Celix i
I've updated the report. Please take a look, if all is ok, I'll post it
this evening or tomorrow. I've also added some in-line comments below.
Celix is an OSGi like implementation in C with a distinct focus on
interoperability between Java and C.
Activity
In the last months there has been a
Hi,
Maybe also mentioned that there was a talk about Apache Celix @ FOSDEM 2015.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Erik Jansman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> Maybe add the creation of the gettingstarted guide on the website at
> http://celix.apache.org/d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Maybe add the creation of the gettingstarted guide on the website at
http://celix.apache.org/documentation/getting_started.html which will
help new users.
Not sure if it should be here but I'll ask it anyway, what is the next
big development g
2014-09-10 14:21 GMT+02:00 Marcel Offermans :
> Looking good, perhaps we could include some kind of progress report on any
> ongoing "migration" tasks from incubator -> tlp? Or have all of those been
> completed already? If so we could explicitly mention that.
>
I'll add something for this as wel
Looking good, perhaps we could include some kind of progress report on any
ongoing "migration" tasks from incubator -> tlp? Or have all of those been
completed already? If so we could explicitly mention that.
And formally I think it would be good to also report when we added the last PMC
member.
29 matches
Mail list logo