RE: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repos to gitbox.apache.org - one week left!

+1 from me too! Thanks, Alex -Original Message- From: Michael Joyce Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 6:08 AM To: dev@climate.apache.org Subject: Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repos to gitbox.apache.org - one week left! +1 -- Jimmy On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:39 PM Omkar

Re: Feedback on OCW on Windows

Hi Dominic, Responses inline: On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 1:31 AM Dominic Cooney wrote: > OK, I sorted things out to a degree. > > To summarize, here's problematic things for me as a Windows user: > > - When you clone from git and conda install ocw, and it leads to the > confusing situation I was in

Re: Availability of Pydap

. Any > ideas? Anything we can pull from the netcdf depndency? > > Lewis > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:27 AM, > wrote: > > > > > From: "Goodman, Alexander (398K)" > > To: "dev@climate.apache.org" > > Cc: > > Bcc: > > Date:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OCW 1.3.0 RC1

+1 from me. On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Lee, Kyo (398L) wrote: > +1 from huikyole > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Apr 20, 2018, at 7:24 AM, Lewis John McGibbney > wrote: > > > > PING folks... > > > >> On 2018/03/28 14:24:02, lewis john

Re: Dropping support for Python 2.7

> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Goodman, Alexander (398K) < > alexander.good...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > > This isn't something we have made any hard decisions about, but if you > > asked for my personal impression, I think just a

Re: Installing pyesgf With Python 3

Hi Michael, Unfortunately esgf-pyclient has not been fully ported to python 3 yet: https://github.com/ESGF/esgf-pyclient/issues/10 Thanks, Alex On Dec 30, 2017 6:13 AM, "Michael Anderson" wrote: conda install --force esgf-pyclient Results in:

Re: dataset_processor.temporal_rebin function should support fine grain control / https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-478

Hi MIchael, Pretty sure that issue is referring to the latter, since there are many potential use cases out there which are looking at data on sub-daily scales (eg 6 and 12-hourly). Nevertheless the majority of our own use monthly data, so this issue hasn't been a high priority. Nevertheless, I

Re: data_processor..mask_missing_data - What is the definition of a missing value?

Hi Michael, The purpose of that function is to propagate missing data from one dataset to all others so that the evaluation is consistent. Depending on what loader is used, datasets without missing data do not use masked arrays for the value attribute. (See CLIMATE-819). I would just modify the

Re: esgf modules give myproxy.client.MyProxyClientGetError: Certificate generation failure.

Hi Michael, What version of myproxyclient are you using? I was able to reproduce the problem on a machine with an older version installed, but after updating to 2.0.1, I do not have the problem. Thanks, Alex On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Michael Anderson < michael.arthur.ander...@gmail.com>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.2.0 RC1

+1 On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:38 AM, lewis john mcgibbney wrote: > Hi all, > > The first release candidate for Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.2.0 is now > available. > > The tag for this release is available at: https://s.apache.org/SscB > > Release artifacts are available

Re: beginner errors

2/12/2017 03:21 PM, Todd Greenwood-Geer wrote: > > > > On Feb 12, 2017 2:02 PM, "Goodman, Alexander (398K)" < > alexander.good...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > > Hi Todd, > > What versions of numpy and matplotlib are you using? I know that both of > t

Re: beginner errors

Hi Todd, What versions of numpy and matplotlib are you using? I know that both of these packages have had some major releases recently, and I suspect that incompatibilities introduced in these releases may be the reason for the errors your seeing as the last commit to the ocw repo came before

Re: Preparatory work for 1.2.0 Release

Hi Lewis, I think at this point we are ready to make a 1.2.0 release. Are you able to set this in motion? Thanks, Alex On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Goodman, Alexander (398K) < alexander.good...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Lewis, > > All good points. The reason I initially t

Re: Preparatory work for 1.2.0 Release

onses inline > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:31 PM, <dev-digest-h...@climate.apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > From: "Goodman, Alexander (398K)" <alexander.good...@jpl.nasa.gov> > > To: "dev@climate.apache.org" <dev@climate.apache.org>

Re: Preparatory work for 1.2.0 Release

/pull/1784 [1] https://github.com/apache/climate/pull/411 What do you think? Thanks, Alex On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Goodman, Alexander (398K) < alexander.good...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Lewis, > > Agreed. In conjunction with this, I am working to make sure we have 1.1.0 >

Re: Preparatory work for 1.2.0 Release

Hi Lewis, Agreed. In conjunction with this, I am working to make sure we have 1.1.0 up on conda-forge before releasing 1.2.0. This would also be a good way to test how we account for conda packaging in our release process, since once this is done the only thing that we need to do to update the

Re: Installing OCW from Source

Hi Lewis, Yes, conda install currently gets the most recent stable release from github. This is done by specifying the release version in the git_rev field in meta.yaml. Although I rarely need to install OCW from source these days, I have always done it the usual way (eg, python setup.py install

Re: Python 2/3 compatibility

see where we are at? > I am happy to work with the team to gradually upgrade the entire codebase > based on the errors flagged by TravisCI. > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:57 PM, <dev-digest-h...@climate.apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > Python

Python 2/3 compatibility

Hi all, For those out of the loop, Lewis has been spearheading the effort to move the OCW codebase to Python 3 ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-854). We are also in the process of moving over our conda packages to the conda forge ( http://conda-forge.github.io/) in order to help

Re: Issue: Local files are not listing in Dataset selection

Hi Mahesh, First, I strongly suggest installing OCW on your local machine if you want to use it for any serious work. You can easily do so following the instructions here: https://rcmes.jpl.nasa.gov/content/installing-ocw Truthfully, the two interfaces you have tried (GUI and CLI app) are

Re: Issue: Local files are not listing in Dataset selection

Hi Mahesh, As far as I know, our UI currently only supports loading local files that are contained within your /usr/local/ocw directory. Admittedly I am also unable to list the files within the directory after entering "/" but parsing it works if you manually enter the name of the file, eg /.nc.

Re: Issue: CLI - Load ESGF data

Hi Mahesh, It looks like the CLI app only searches the JPL ESGF datanode for the dataset. This works fine for CMIP5 and Obs4MIPs datasets, but unfortunately not for CORDEX datasets. In the future we should allow users to specify which datanodes to search in the CLI app, but for now you will need

Re: [DISCUSS] new conda package installer and future releases

omment below > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:21 AM, <dev-digest-h...@climate.apache.org> > wrote: > > > From: "Goodman, Alexander (398K)" <alexander.good...@jpl.nasa.gov> > > To: "dev@climate.apache.org" <dev@climate.apache.org> > > Cc: &g

[DISCUSS] new conda package installer and future releases

Hi folks, I have finished creating a wiki page regarding the recently released OCW conda package here [1]. This includes installation information as well as a rough guide for maintaining the packages. Again, please test everything if you have not read my previous email already. I would also like

[ANNOUNCE] new ocw conda package!

Hi all, I am pleased to inform you all that we now have a prototype conda package for OCW. If you have conda installed (if you don't, then you should!), users may now install ocw to their ocw environment using conda install -c agoodman ocw There are some caveats to this approach for using OCW,

Re: Concern over Examples Test Duration

Hi Lewis, Do you know which examples specifically? The configuration file examples I have most recently tested usually take roughly 3-5 minutes for me to run. The majority of the time is spent downloading the data (as you have mentioned) and then processing (mainly regridding). Depending on the

Re: Data Sources overhaul

you have the new function ready I'd be glad to convert it > and test both the pylint changes and the file load changes at the same > time. > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Goodman, Alexander (398K) < > alexander.good...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > > > Hi All, > &g