---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11620/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santhanam and Hugo Trippaers.
+1, but hopefully only those features already proposed are allowed.
In future lets move the code freeze date before the freeze date :), makes
life easier for folks scrambling to get their feature in.
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 04/06/13 10:47 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
+0 - similar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11620/#review21410
---
Ship it!
D'oh. was testing the same thing. You were clearly
+0
If proposed features are completed earlier then we shouldn't wait for 4 weeks.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:30 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11327/#review21411
---
I am still not able to reproduce this issue on master. Attached the
-Original Message-
From: Hiroaki KAWAI [mailto:ka...@stratosphere.co.jp]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 4:34 AM
To: Hugo Trippaers
Cc: Sheng Yang; cloudstack
Subject: Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2327: make cloud-setup-agent
ovs aware
That's interesting to see some details are
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11623/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh.
Description
---
-- Forwarded message --
From: Livio Lv sandiwater1...@gmail.com
Date: 2013/6/4
Subject: Non-OSS Package: Could not find corresponding resource manager for
VMware
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Hi all:
1.Does Cloudstack can manange RHEV KVM?
2.Why Cloudstack 4.02 can not manage
Hi Chip,
On 06/03/2013 07:22 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
Wido,
I have the access, and I have the results of building from the release
source, but I don't have the knowledge to specifically know what to put
where and what to run to get the non-OSS DEB's I just built into the
repo.
Can you share
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11621/#review21415
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On June 4, 2013, 7:23
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 06:28:39PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:24:20PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote:
Hey Prasanna ,
I see that the response object name is
findstoragepoolsformigrationresponse , which is correct as shown
below . Are you referring to this
I would vote +1 only if A) No new features B) Existing features should
continue to work and not cause for regression failures .
Thanks,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:32 PM
To:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10970/#review21417
---
Hi,
Not anymore, but that was where the code broke because of a resource leak.
Please just remove that test!
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
The build of latest master branch spent much more time on
ConfigurationServerImplTest.java, which includes test
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:23:10PM +0200, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
Hi,
Not anymore, but that was where the code broke because of a resource leak.
Please just remove that test!
Yup - removed y'day with 22bda5c3c960e1e6897b3b0aaacdf91add97976d
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Wei ZHOU
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11626/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Description
---
Prasanna,
Thanks
-Wei
2013/6/4 Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:23:10PM +0200, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
Hi,
Not anymore, but that was where the code broke because of a resource
leak.
Please just remove that test!
Yup - removed y'day with
+1
-SWAMY
On 04/06/13 3:03 PM, Sailaja Mada sailaja.m...@citrix.com wrote:
I would vote +1 only if A) No new features B) Existing features should
continue to work and not cause for regression failures .
Thanks,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers
The Apache CloudStack PMC has invited John Burwell to join the PMC, and
he has accepted. Congrats John!
-chip
Congrats! :-)
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 3:35 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New CloudStack PMC Member: John Burwell
The Apache CloudStack PMC has invited John Burwell to join the PMC,
Congrats John! Great to have you on board :)
Thank you for your ongoing effort in making CloudStack even better.
Wido
On 06/04/2013 03:35 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
The Apache CloudStack PMC has invited John Burwell to join the PMC, and
he has accepted. Congrats John!
-chip
Congrats!
2013/6/4 Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
The Apache CloudStack PMC has invited John Burwell to join the PMC, and
he has accepted. Congrats John!
-chip
Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience!
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:23:10PM +0200, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
Hi,
Not anymore, but that was where the code broke because of a resource
leak.
Please just remove that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11540/#review21418
---
Heya,
You know you can commit this directly? No need to go through
Well done John,
-sebastien
On Jun 4, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Congrats!
2013/6/4 Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
The Apache CloudStack PMC has invited John Burwell to join the PMC, and
he has accepted. Congrats John!
-chip
Welcome and congrats John.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 10:12 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New CloudStack PMC Member: John Burwell
Well done John,
-sebastien
On Jun 4, 2013, at
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11600/
---
(Updated June 4, 2013, 2:51 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
Thanks, Prasanna!
Just so that I know for future reference, do you think I just missed
reading an e-mail that came out about this or was there some other way I
should have detected this?
Thanks again!
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03,
Congratulations John
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 6:35 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New CloudStack PMC Member: John Burwell
The Apache CloudStack PMC has invited John Burwell to join
Congrats! Well deserved!
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 6:35 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New CloudStack PMC Member: John Burwell
The Apache CloudStack PMC has invited John
Awesomesauce. Thanks for the work so far and congrats.
On Jun 4, 2013 2:35 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache CloudStack PMC has invited John Burwell to join the PMC, and
he has accepted. Congrats John!
-chip
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11627/#review21422
---
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade40to41.java
Reposting for the last time, perhaps someone may have an answer.
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 4:46 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [SSVM][NETWORK] Change management net to public network
I
Congrats John!
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
Awesomesauce. Thanks for the work so far and congrats.
On Jun 4, 2013 2:35 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache CloudStack PMC has invited John Burwell to join the PMC, and
he
Hi,
Does anyone know if there is a way to stop the build from (very often)
halting here indefinitely?
2013-06-04 12:19:47,836 INFO [utils.net.NetUtilsTest] (main:) IP is
1234:5678::dd3b:e82c:ce6b:fe5c
2013-06-04 12:19:47,839 INFO [utils.net.NetUtilsTest] (main:) IP is
We send out the following threads to discuss the issues of object_store branch:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201306.mbox/%3C77B337AF224FD84CBF8401947098DD87036A76%40SJCPEX01CL01.citrite.net%3E
Hi Chip! I'm fine either ways. We don't really need to remove anything and
if you want you can remove the snapshot and put the said release in action.
My dayjob is very engaging so I'm finding less time hacking CloudStack, so
please go ahead with your judgement. I/we already welcome people who
The problem I'm seeing is that -SNAPSHOT is a newer version than -0, so
4.1.0-0 (the one I published from the release) isn't being downloaded.
Instead 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT-3 is the one that's pulled. Perhaps I'm just not
configuring things right? Knowing your schedule, if you don't mind
taking a look
Hi, sorry for replying on this thread; I'm not on marketing list and I
suppose not everyone is, I think it's better to put someone in cc or do a
reply-all in case we want to include people we are replying or wish to
include them in some discussion, for example this thread and email was
missed by
Mike,
It feels like we are combining two distinct concepts -- storage device
management and storage protocols. In both cases, we are communicating with
ISCSI, but one allows the system to create/delete volumes (Dynamic) on the
device while the other requires the volume to be volume to be
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:09:21AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
The problem I'm seeing is that -SNAPSHOT is a newer version than -0, so
4.1.0-0 (the one I published from the release) isn't being downloaded.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
The problem I'm seeing is that -SNAPSHOT is a newer version than -0, so
4.1.0-0 (the one I published from the release) isn't being downloaded.
Instead 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT-3 is the one that's pulled. Perhaps I'm just not
Hi John,
What you say here may very well make sense, but I'm having a hard time
envisioning it.
Perhaps we should draw Edison in on this conversation as he was the initial
person to suggest the approach I took.
What do you think?
Thanks!
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, John Burwell
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:09:21AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
The problem I'm seeing is that -SNAPSHOT is a newer version than -0,
Also, we already released 4.1.0. If this is needed, how should it be
correctly done for a 4.1.1 release?
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 05:03:49PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:22:02AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:09:21AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Wed,
To ensure that we are in sync on terminology, volume, in these
definitions, refers to the physical allocation on the device, correct?
Yes...when I say 'volume', I try to mean 'SAN volume'.
To refer to the 'volume' the end user can make in CloudStack, I try to use
'CloudStack volume'.
On Tue,
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:09:47PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:22:02AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
On
So, the flow is as follows:
* The admin registers the SolidFire driver (which is a type of so-called
Dynamic storage). Once this is done, a new Primary Storage shows up in the
applicable zone.
* The admin creates a Disk Offering that references the storage tag of the
newly created Primary
Mike,
To me, the key is to recognize the difference between the two types of volumes.
So, in Dynamic, the system is capable of allocation space on the device (in
SolidFire's case, does this mean that a LUN gets created as well?), as well as,
move bits around. As I look though it, it seems
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:09:47PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:22:02AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Wed,
Just to clarify my understanding, multiple CloudStack volumes can be
stored on a single SAN volume. If so, how does the Management Server
determine when to create a SAN volume?
This might be where we're missing each other. :)
A main purpose for Edison's storage framework changes were to enable
Mike,
See my responses in-line.
Thanks,
-John
On Jun 4, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I'm trying to picture this:
Finally, while CloudStack may be able to manage a device, an operator may
chose to leave it unmanaged by CloudStack (e.g. the device is
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:22:03PM -0400, Han,Meng wrote:
Hi Chip,
My JIRA ID is kyrameng
Thanks for checking that for me!
Best,
Meng
Done,
Please assign the jira to yourself now.
This vote has *passed* with the following results:
+1 : John, Marcus, Clayton, Ilya, Animesh, Sudha, Min, Will, Alex,
Edison, Kelven, Hiroaki, Abhi, Sateesh, Mice, Kevin, Nitin, Swamy,
Mike (non-binding)
+0 : Prasanna, Koushik
-0 : Chiradeep, Wei, Sebastien
-1 : David, Hugo, Joe
Thank you
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:19:19AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi Chip,
On 06/03/2013 07:22 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
Wido,
I have the access, and I have the results of building from the release
source, but I don't have the knowledge to specifically know what to put
where and what to
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013, at 01:24 PM, Edison Su wrote:
If you want to have a weekly IRC meeting on the subjects, definitely, we
can do that.
The standing IRC meeting would be a good one to discuss this.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
On 06/04/2013 10:24 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:19:19AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi Chip,
On 06/03/2013 07:22 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
Wido,
I have the access, and I have the results of building from the release
source, but I don't have the knowledge to
I have updated the 4.2 release dates in wiki [1] as a result of the 4 weeks
push out. Please check.
Summary:
Feature freeze: 6/28
RC : 8/19
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+4.2+Release
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers
On May 28, 2013, 3:37 p.m., John Burwell wrote:
core/src/com/cloud/storage/template/S3TemplateDownloader.java, line 69
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11277/diff/1/?file=29#file29line69
1. This class need to be formatted -- line lengths exceed wrap and the
indentation is
Also marked the open unresolved bugs for 4.2
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:52 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULT] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
I have updated the 4.2
John,
I am trying to fix issue #2 mentioned here to handle multi-part upload using
TransferManager, but ran into the following issue
2013-06-04 23:06:52,626 INFO [amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient]
(s3-transfer-manager-worker-1:) Unable to execute HTTP request: peer not
authenticated
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11277/#review21443
---
core/src/com/cloud/storage/template/S3TemplateDownloader.java
On May 28, 2013, 3:37 p.m., John Burwell wrote:
core/src/com/cloud/storage/template/S3TemplateDownloader.java, line 86
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11277/diff/1/?file=29#file29line86
What are these attributes default visibility? It seems that they
should be private ...
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder cloudstack-site-staging
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/cloudstack-site-staging/builds/166
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Also marked the open unresolved bugs for 4.2
If they didn't have a fix version, then why 4.2? What about a 4.1.x
release or
I am looking at the code for findByServiceProvider in
PhysicalNetworkServiceProviderDaoImpl.java:
public PhysicalNetworkServiceProviderVO findByServiceProvider(long
physicalNetworkId, String providerType) {
SearchCriteriaPhysicalNetworkServiceProviderVO sc =
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013, at 12:49 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
Thanks, this is more elegant for RPMs. I'm trying the fix now. But the
hack I put in should work for debian packages too.
Are we sure on this? If the fix is good for 4.1.1, we can respin and
start the VOTE Wednesday.z
Best,
jzb
--
The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the 4.1.0 release
of the CloudStack Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud orchestration
platform. This is the first major release from Apache CloudStack since
its graduation from the Apache Incubator on March 20th.
Apache CloudStack is an
Joe,
I would like to get clock drift fixed for 4.1.1 as well. What needs
to be done to test the 4.2 system VMs? How can folks assist with the
testing process?
Thanks,
-Jojn
On Jun 4, 2013, at 10:17 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013, at 12:49 AM, Prasanna
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 09:16:29PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013, at 12:49 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
Thanks, this is more elegant for RPMs. I'm trying the fix now. But the
hack I put in should work for debian packages too.
Are we sure on this? If the fix is good for
The typo is there because the same typo exists when creating the search
builder in the constructor. In the constructor, the string
serviceProvderType is associated with the VO field 'providerName'. If
you fix the method, you should fix the constructor (although there is no
apparent logic error,
Is this a non-oss build ??
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 06/04/2013 10:24 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:19:19AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi Chip,
On 06/03/2013 07:22 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
Wido,
I have
73 matches
Mail list logo
