---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12267/
---
(Updated July 9, 2013, 6:04 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, edison su,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12267/#review22886
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sateesh Chodapuneedi
On July 9, 2013, 6:04
Thank you Marcus
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:37 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: ACS 4.1.1 release - bugfixes to backport
This fixes a known bug, was never applied to 4.1. Committed.
commit
Hi Girish,
Both your assumptions are right.
And going by the first assumption the test cases that are failing need to be
updated. Since the VM is being moved from a subdomain to another under the same
domain, the move should be successful and not raise an exception.
Thanks,
Likitha
From:
Hello,
In order to create shared network StartIp/endIp/gateway/netmask are required. I
am looking at an old test case which creates shared network without IP range
and deploys vm in it. It of course fails as IP range is required while creating
shared network.
Has anything related to shared
Prasanna, Can you direct this one to some one with an insight into this
part of the system?
thanks,
Daan
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:37 PM, daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12327/
Review
All,
I want to backport this to 4.1.x and 4.2 as I consider it a bug.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
Prasanna, Can you direct this one to some one with an insight into this
part of the system?
thanks,
Daan
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:37 PM,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12327/
---
(Updated July 9, 2013, 9:16 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12323/#review22893
---
server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12109/#review22894
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12109/#review22895
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12109/#review22896
---
core/src/com/cloud/network/HAProxyConfigurator.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12273/#review22897
---
server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12273/#review22898
---
server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12273/#review22899
---
server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12251/#review22900
---
server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/
---
(Updated July 9, 2013, 10:34 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12251/#review22901
---
Can you create a new patch that consolidates all these changes and
So, nobody uses q in q and cloudstack 4.1 ?
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Valery Ciareszka
valery.teres...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I use the following environment: CS 4.1, KVM, Centos 6.4
(management+node1+node2), OpenIndiana NFS server as primary and secondary
storage
I have advanced
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11906/#review22903
---
Patch doesn't apply cleanly on master. Can you verify and share an
Hello All,
As you know, evaluating performance of a resource allocation policy for a cloud
environment is very important, also it is critical to be able to compare
different policies' performance with each other. So, I am interested to know
that do developers of CloudStack use any specific
Thanks for your reply Tariq. I fiddled around with the settings a bit
but the problem still persisted. I then saw that the primary storage
was scoped for the HOST instead of CLUSTER or ZONE. I added one more
primary storage and then restarted management server and the secondary
storage came
Hi,
We have a xenserver 6.1 pool with 6 hosts, there are total about 90 VMs. Some
with one disk and others with 2 disk on NFS shared storage.
In the meanwhile, we have a cloudstack 3.0.2 with xenserver 6.0.2 hosts.(we had
plan of upgrading to cloudstack 4.1xenserver 6.1 soon) The storage is on
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:44:26AM +, Edison Su wrote:
The simulator issue should be fixed on 4.2 branch.
Do you mind pulling those changes into master?
Edison,
As I read through this thread, we seem to be conflating the following topics:
1. Feature regression testing per release cycle
2. Identifying and back porting defect fixes to previous releases
3. Feature removal process
To my mind, these topics are completely
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:09:06AM -0700, gaurav jain wrote:
I am trying to install cloudstack following the steps given in the INSTALL.md
file which is there with the cloudstack release.
However I have been unsuccessful. I am trying to download maven, but all the
mirrors say Page Not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12184/#review22907
---
Commit 48d2525f477bf2f2b22b9baabc44c93a10f6d725 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/
---
(Updated July 9, 2013, 3:02 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12364/#review22909
---
Commit 3e7cebee2967e3523cb679ef30fcb19f7949c2dc in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12364/#review22910
---
Commit 2005aae7ac0a8a10ab4fc64803354ca4051a6d29 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12364/#review22911
---
Commit e1736bcca50f1c74b1c71dce72e27ef7f62bab30 in branch
If you're working with 4.1, the current documentation contains several path
or URL errors that are not updated with CloudStack refactor.
It's better to refer to the daily build for the unreleased 4.1.1 at jenkins:
Syed,
The Console Proxy VM is also a system VM and presents a console view for a VM
instance via the web UI. With it being a DevCloud, if you don't need to use the
console proxy then you can set the maximum number of console proxy vms to 0
under Global Settings.
Btw have you followed step 8
During the setup process, I now get some NumberFormatExceptions.
I call: mvn -Pdeveloper,marvin.setup
-Dmarvin.config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg -pl :cloud-marvin
integration-test
I see in the console:
ERROR [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (Simulator-Agent-Mgr-1:)
Monitor DownloadListener says
Chip
I was going through and following the steps given on the link suggested by you.
However I was unsuccessful.
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Installation_Guide/sect-source-verify.html
The KEYS link opens up a html page. I tried copying the data
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:55:36AM -0700, gaurav jain wrote:
Chip
I was going through and following the steps given on the link suggested by
you.
However I was unsuccessful.
There is no UI support for regions in 4.1. All API calls relating to regions
feature is implemented.
Note that cloudstack does not do data sync between regions.
There are few open issues relating to Regions and Event notifications:
CLOUDSTACK-1673 - AWS Regions - Events - User disable / Domain
I think it's the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3139,
that your mgt server can't access the url of template.
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 9:41 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject:
Chip
It is a HTML link.
What should I do. Copy the text in a text file? what extension should it have?
Is there any particular directory I should save it to?
From: Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
To: gaurav jain tashan1...@yahoo.com
Cc:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12245/#review22921
---
Ship it!
looks good, ship it.
- Fang Wang
On July 3, 2013,
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:36:24AM -0700, gaurav jain wrote:
Chip
It is a HTML link.
What should I do. Copy the text in a text file? what extension should it
have? Is there any particular directory I should save it to?
It's a text file. Just save it to whatever location or file you want,
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 7:52 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds live tests - some
questions.
=)
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:44:26AM +, Edison Su
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:24:53PM +, Edison Su wrote:
I think it's the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3139,
that your mgt server can't access the url of template.
Yeah, it appears so. Thanks for searching for me. Apparently I was too
lazy to actually check
-Original Message-
From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 7:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: 'Chip Childers'
Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
Edison,
As I read through this thread, we
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:56:24PM +, Edison Su wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 7:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: 'Chip Childers'
Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:00 AM
To: Edison Su
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:56:24PM +,
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:56:24PM +, Edison Su wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 7:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: 'Chip Childers'
Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:01:08PM +, Edison Su wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:00 AM
To: Edison Su
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be
On July 9, 2013, 5:37 p.m., Fang Wang wrote:
looks good, ship it.
Did you commit this Fang?
- Chip
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12245/#review22921
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 1:26 PM
To: Edison Su
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 05:15:19PM +,
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:12:22PM +, Edison Su wrote:
If it's ok to use S3 api talking to swift, then there is zero effort to
support Swift.
But who will make the decision?
We, as a community. It's *always* that answer.
If you are proposing this as the corrective path, then ok...
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12327/
---
(Updated July 9, 2013, 6:38 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12327/#review22926
---
Getting this error after applying to master:
Tests in error:
On July 9, 2013, 6:41 p.m., Chip Childers wrote:
Getting this error after applying to master:
Tests in error:
testConfigDnsMasq(com.cloud.network.router.VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImplTest):
Failed to load ApplicationContext
FWIW, outside of the test failure this looks
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:22 AM
To: Edison Su
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:12:22PM +,
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +, Edison Su wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:22 AM
To: Edison Su
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be
Edison,
Swift does not support S3 multi-part uploads [1] which CloudStack must use in
order to store files larger than 5 GB. Therefore, using the Swift's S3
compatibility layer is not a viable workaround.
Thanks,
-John
[1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/APIFeatureComparison
On Jul
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12369/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, Kelven Yang, Sateesh
if swift does not work anymore in 4.0 or 4.1 maybe be should inform swiftstack:
http://swiftstack.com/cloudstack/
On Jul 9, 2013, at 3:57 PM, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com wrote:
Edison,
Swift does not support S3 multi-part uploads [1] which CloudStack must use in
order to store files
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
if swift does not work anymore in 4.0 or 4.1 maybe be should inform
swiftstack:
http://swiftstack.com/cloudstack/
Just to be clear, we're not sure about 4.0 or 4.1 at all. All that
has been said is that it wasn't in
It sounds like there are a lot of work to do, to support multi-part upload:
http://www.mirantis.com/blog/large-objects-in-cloud-storages/
As you can see, Amazon S3 API is more high-level while Swift API for large
objects is pretty raw. Swift doesn't make a distinction between objects and
Could they(swiftstack) help us, or guide us on how to implement multi-part
upload?
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:07 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: 'Chip Childers'
Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013, at 03:15 PM, Edison Su wrote:
Could they(swiftstack) help us, or guide us on how to implement
multi-part upload?
I've sent an email to John at SwiftStack to see if they might be able to
jump into the conversation.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter:
On June 28, 2013, 3:42 p.m., John Burwell wrote:
core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/AttachVolumeCommand.java, line 61
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11479/diff/4/?file=310095#file310095line61
Fix formatting/continuation from the previous line
I think I fixed all formatting issues in this
Edison,
TL;DR The shorter path is to re-implement/fix the Swift driver.
Multipart upload would need to implemented in Swift, not in CloudStack.
Therefore, such a change would need to be accepted and released by the
OpenStack project before the 4.2.0 release. We would also be stranding any of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12364/#review22933
---
Commit 3e7cebee2967e3523cb679ef30fcb19f7949c2dc in branch
Edison,
I did not say that Swift can't handle files greater than 5 GB. With S3, you
must use multi-part uploads in order to upload a file greater than 5GB.
Therefore, Swift's S3 compatibility layer must be compatible with the S3
multipart upload API in order to work with CloudStack. Please
Hi Edison,
It looks like this bean is missing from the applicationContext.xml file with
commit# 5e13327339305cd81993952abbd8c19409a48537, causing the mgmt. server to
fail to startup with this error :
INFO [hypervisor.vmware.VmwareServerDiscoverer] (main:) VmwareServerDiscoverer
is
We should move all the simulator related classes into
client/tomcatconf/simulatorComponentContext.xml.in
Let me fix it, thanks for your report.
-Original Message-
From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 2:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Edison Su
Subject:
Ah ok, thanks Edison!
Cheers!
Regards,
Vijay
-Original Message-
From: Edison Su
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 2:10 PM
To: Vijayendra Bhamidipati; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: SimulatorSecondaryDiscoverer bean
We should move all the simulator related classes into
Hi everyone,
I had a question posed to me today regarding how CloudStack and the
underlying hypervisor deal with an iSCSI volume that is expanded.
For example, let's say I'm using XenServer or ESX and I create a storage
repository or datastore, respectively, for each hypervisor based on an
iSCSI
http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX120865
for XenServer, VMs need to be shut down or migrated away before expanding a
volume.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 2:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12348/
---
(Updated July 9, 2013, 10:15 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:57 AM
To: Edison Su
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in
4.2?
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +,
I've also sent a request off to Mirantis to see if they could lend any
expertise to the fire to help.
Cheers,
Matt
On 7/9/13 3:19 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013, at 03:15 PM, Edison Su wrote:
Could they(swiftstack) help us, or guide us on how to implement
Greetings,Is there any plan to make use of mirrors for folks downloading / updating from the repo. Or is there one inexistencenow?- Maurice
Hey Anthony,
I assume this would be a candidate situation where you'd put the primary
storage in maintenance mode and then perform the steps you referred me to?
When the storage is brought out of maintenance mode, will it see the new
size or is there something more that has to be done on the CS
If there is a need, we (Contegix) are happy to host one.
Cheers,
Matthew
---
Matthew E. Porter
Contegix
E-mail: matthew.por...@contegix.com
Twitter: @meporter | http://twitter.com/meporter
On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:24 PM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.com wrote:
Greetings,
Is there any
Hello,I'm curious, is this the most recent up to date system VM for download for KVM?http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2
That would seem to make sense. Great for redundancy, and if the mirrors are
on multiple continents then it should help with any bandwidth starved
downloaders.
On Jul 9, 2013 8:24 PM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.com wrote:
Greetings,
Is there any plan to make use of mirrors for folks
Agreed, today alone; I am doing another fresh install for some of the RPMs it took 14 minutes. Where others took what appeared seconds.On Jul 09, 2013, at 09:32 PM, Kelly Hair ke...@routerlab.net wrote:That would seem to make sense. Great for redundancy, and if the mirrors are on multiple
Yes, there are some problems with roller instance (the underlying
software that blogs.a.o runs). Infrastructure has been discussing the
situation.
There is no immediate timeline on having the issue resolved to my knowledge.
--David
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Ryan Lei ryan...@cht.com.tw
I'm +1 also to taking the latest stable release.
Tom.
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 13:28 -0400, John Burwell wrote:
Edison,
I vote to take the latest stable from Amazon. In addition to keeping up with
security and bug fixes, it also ensures that we stay in sync with any
refinements that Amazon
We'll try to get it up as soon as the issues clear up.
Matt
On 7/9/13 9:06 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Yes, there are some problems with roller instance (the underlying
software that blogs.a.o runs). Infrastructure has been discussing the
situation.
There is no immediate timeline
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12398/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Animesh Chaturvedi.
Bugs: 3432
Repository:
Folks
We are now just 3 weeks from ACS 4.2 code freeze on 7/29. We have around 400
open defects with 100+ blockers and critical and I expect another 200 new
defects to come in. As a community we have been fixing roughly 100 defects per
week, in order to clear up our backlog I request you to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12360/
---
Review request for cloudstack, edison su, soren, and Wei Zhou.
Summary
Sorry this took a little longer than expected with the holiday in US. Here's
the first proposal [1] on the automated test system. Comments welcome.
Specifically, I have one question on if we should have a staging branch for all
release branches and master where all checkins go and the build
I have started my cloudstack in advanced mode, however, during the process I am seeing this:2013-07-09 23:23:55,920 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:null) release cpu from host: 1, old used: 500,reserved: 0, actual total: 36256, total with overprovisioning: 36256; new
InsufficientServerCapacity = You didn't have enough resources to
launch the VM. It can be due to out of memory on hosts, out of CPU, or
not able to find storage. Sometimes this is just due to a mismatch in
service offerings. For example, often in a dev environment you just
set up a local primary
Is there any update on this check in ? Is some one taking a look at this
missing feature?
Thanks,
~Talluri
On 03/07/13 10:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
I see the review request https://reviews.apache.org/r/9241/ is marked as
submitted on 2/7 but don't see the
91 matches
Mail list logo
