---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2013, 6:19 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
On July 29, 2013, 12:32 p.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py, line 374
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/diff/3/?file=330049#file330049line374
I think you are not clear with the default egress policy.
- egress policy true
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13188/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3042
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13188/#review24418
---
Ship it!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13188/#review24422
---
Commit f12adfff8a7b51c53466ab556d5efe2c1961fe3e in branch
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
The reason why CloudSand was created, was to bring in urgently needed
features into stable version, such that on the next major upgrade to ACS, all
features work as expected and nothing should break.
This is the same
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12264/#review24425
---
Commit b4fe0252230e74d36f62679cd2a751f278edacc1 in branch
Next thing to do would be to sniff the traffic... Where's it failing to
traverse?
Ahmad
On Jul 31, 2013, at 6:40 AM, Thomas Schneider thomas.schnei...@euskill.com
wrote:
I disabled it.
Le 30/07/2013 17:58, Ahmad Emneina a écrit :
guest os firewall?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:14 AM,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13109/#review24426
---
test/integration/component/test_affinity_groups.py
On Aug. 1, 2013, 8:26 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/base.py, line 574
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13109/diff/1/?file=331286#file331286line574
For every API in base, just use the prefix verb before the Cloud
resource as the name of the
On July 2, 2013, 7:11 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
Your change seems fine.
Did you regression test it? Or did you solve a problem with it?
Dave Brosius wrote:
Just noticed during code inspection
Dave, can you also open a ticket for this and mention your review request in
the
Hi,
Portable IP documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3236
Please see section 15.22. Portable IPs (169), and provide your feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
Hi,
Deleting and Archiving Events and documentation is ready for review. The doc is
attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1567.
Please see section 22.1.6. Deleting and Archiving Events and Alerts (223), and
provide your feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
Thanks Animesh, I'll be checking open tasks too.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 8:44 AM
To:
Hi,
GSLB documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-893
Please see section 15.11. Global Server Load Balancing Support, and provide
your feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
Hi Sebastien,
I've read the ruby client project by Chips. It's pretty looks like
I'm doing now for _https://github.com/isaacchiang/cloud_ruby. Please have a
look. I believe there are
some code segments that would be helpful to the rOCCI driver. I need more
advice to
the rOCCI project,
Hi,
Dedicated Resources: Public IPs and VLANs per Account is Ready documentation is
ready for review. The doc is attached at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-817
Please see section 15.8. Reserving Public IP Addresses and VLANs Per Account
(132), and provide your feedback.
Hi,
Adding and Removing Networks on a VM documentation is ready for review. The doc
is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2986
Please see section 15.6.2. Reconfiguring Networks in VMs (128), and provide
your feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13190/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang.
Bugs:
Hi,
Adding Multiple IP Ranges documentation is ready for review. The doc is
attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-847
Please see 15.13. Adding Multiple IP Ranges (139), and provide your feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11626/#review24360
---
test/integration/component/memory_limits/test_domain_limits.py
Hi,
Adding Multiple IP Ranges documentation is ready for review. The doc is
attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850.
Please see 15.7. IP Reservation in Isolated Guest Networks, and provide your
feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
On Aug. 1, 2013, 11:27 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
test/integration/component/memory_limits/test_domain_limits.py, line 429
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11626/diff/2/?file=328254#file328254line429
use listAccounts and assert to verify count.
Also, can you close the issues opened
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13112/#review24433
---
failed to apply on 4.2 and master
Applying: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11861/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2013, 11:39 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and John
I see this in the review request
Review 13189 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build cloudstack-master-with-patch #99 is :
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master-with-patch/99/
Can you address this?
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Sanjay Tripathi
H,
I am testing an upgrade of my code for sdn based vpc private gateways
(not in the mainstream code). It runs on a custom 4.1.1 based on the
4.1 branch. I have tested it against a 4.0 database and it upgrades
fine.
Now I try to have a master version to which I applied my code to run
against the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13072/#review24435
---
The changes look fine but I don't see much value with this as the
network - newt-name - IP Adresses - source nat adres -
configuration - Port Forwarding
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Gaurav Aradhye
gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com wrote:
Hi all,
Can anybody tell me how to create port forwarding rule for a specific vm
through Cloudstack UI?
You can just
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11861/#review24436
---
Review 11861 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
On Aug. 1, 2013, 8:26 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
test/integration/component/test_affinity_groups.py, line 1444
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13109/diff/1/?file=331285#file331285line1444
use utils.randomgen()
Currently the function random_gen is in utils only. It's not defined
I am able to build the code successfully (tested on both 4.2 and master)
without any issues; and I don't think if there is any issue caused because of
this patch.
There might be some issue with Jenkins bot settings as I am seeing the failure
message in other requests also.
--Sanjay
H,
I made a summary of unanswered questions again. Only three on dev last
week. I will start this on users as well and keep this going the next
few weeks, if usefulness is considered to be high and work load for
this remains low.
http://markmail.org/message/demfcxuhtlflxc76 Unable to create
I think the following list speaks for itself
http://markmail.org/message/ap42zplnpenniqtd can't create VM after
upgrade from 3.0.2 to 4,1. Error Code: 533 Error text: Unable to
create a deploymentfor VM by William Jiang
http://markmail.org/message/wxe6oktgtxtvg6uk Setting up networking on
single
Harikrishna,
I suppose I have to register those templates before upgrading; i.e. in
the 4.1.1 version management server.
Is this procedure described somewhere?
Do I bake the templates myself first or should I use publicly offered templates?
thanks,
Daan
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 3:16 PM,
On 08/01/2013 03:31 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
I think the following list speaks for itself
Although it's really good that you point this out I took the following
decision for myself: I contribute to the project by resolving bugs and
writing new features.
In my case my colleague (Lennert)
Happy to accept pull requests for cloudstack_ruby_client and to them
push the gem.
FWIW, you can always get the latest gem via: gem install
cloudstack_ruby_client
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 06:03:35PM +0800, Isaac Chiang wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
I've read the ruby client project by Chips.
On Aug. 1, 2013, 12:06 p.m., Koushik Das wrote:
The changes look fine but I don't see much value with this as the name can
be easily identified from the db. I feel the logs are used primarily for
debugging issues. And one key aspect that is missing currently is the
correlation of
I agree, that would be useful.
The issue im resolving here is that 1) not everyone who has access to look
at the logs and troubleshoot also has access to (or knows the schema of)
the database. There might be an issue with a KVM host, but the admin will
waste time manually hunting down which host
My mistake. Didn't read the bug report clearly. So mgmt server would
need to know ahead of time to allow ports considered safe by the admin
so it can program that during SecStorageSetupCommand.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:41:16PM +, Min Chen wrote:
Hi Prasanna,
I think what Tom and
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:13:14PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 07/30/2013 09:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Folks code freeze was on 7/29 and starting today we are moving ACS 42 into
limited updates in preparation for RC on 8/19. Code changes are now limited
to fixes to blocker
My comments inline.
Thanks
Harikrishna
On 01-Aug-2013, at 7:05 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Harikrishna,
I suppose I have to register those templates before upgrading; i.e. in
the 4.1.1 version management server.
Yes. in 4.1.1 these templates are registered as USER
Yes the password is encrypted with public key of ssh key pair assigned to the
guest VM during deployment.
We can decrypt it using the private key of that key pair.
-Harikrishna
On 01-Aug-2013, at 3:13 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.commailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12958/#review24442
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajesh Battala
On July 31, 2013, 10:10
I have allready run master against this dev env, and added the
mentioned entry in the upgrade map. Now I cannot access the database
using 4.1.1 anymore because of
ERROR [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentTaskPool-1:) Monitor
StoragePoolMonitor says there is an error in the connect process for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13192/#review24443
---
Review 13192 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13189/#review24446
---
Commit 47803c21fb66acf786a3c6df99596c41f621b4fe in branch
Ilya,
Were you able to sort this out? I'm holding off on the announcement of
the release until we get the docs online.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:48:34PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
David,
El6 is using 2.1.0, let me try out 2.8.2
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13112/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2013, 4:34 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13112/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2013, 4:51 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
Daan and Hugo,
This is just my opinion, you should consider merging this feature into master
when time allows - this way you don't have to maintain a private branch of ACS
in the future. Just my two cents :)
Regards
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland
+1
If it's due to company specific issues (licensing or company secret). Maybe we
can propose a plugin interface for it and see if you can keep just that code
private.
Just look at how much master have changed from 4.2. If we can we should try
not to fork on the core code in cloudstack.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13112/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2013, 5:08 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
I needed a different configuration than DevCloud provided, so I turned to
CloudMonkey to automate setup of my test environment.
This led to a blog on automating with CloudMonkey at
http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/using-cloudmonkey-to-automate.html
What I forgot to mention is that
Daan,
This is a great service you're providing to the community! I will go to my
management and see if we can lend some support in terms of following up on your
list. Do you want to tag it so if I do get some resources, we have an easy way
to filter in your report?
--Alex
-Original
You can always send them over to IRC where I am. Usually it's easier to handle
support in real-time.
- Original Message -
From: Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 10:15:08 AM
Subject: RE: we like dev better then users :(
Daan,
I'm short on time, but here's the KVM advanced networking config we
use for testing. If someone wants to write a doc based around it that
would be nice.
Start out KVM host with two networks, eth0, eth1. eth0 is intended for
public traffic, eth0 will be guest vlans and management vlan. then
create
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12905/#review24452
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alena Prokharchyk
On July 31, 2013, 3:07
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13112/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2013, 6:01 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
Have you taken the DB dump before trying to upgrade.
Then you can build CS in 4.1.1 and apply the dump.
-Harikrishna
On 01-Aug-2013, at 8:42 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I have allready run master against this dev env, and added the
mentioned entry in the upgrade map. Now
Hi,
I'm working on a disk cache setting for per disk offering which allows
users to set it to:
- none (current behaviour and default)
- writeback
- writethrough
I've done some work in the disk-cache branch [0] where I created a new
column called cache_mode in the disk_offering table.
It's
Donal,
Thanks for the details and putting this together - this is definitely helpful
and I'm bookmarking this.
Please post it on wiki as tutorial.
Regards
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 1:13 PM
To:
Wido,
We actually have plenty of places that uses enums. I think you're specifically
talking about saving the ordinal values of an enum into the database. You can
do that easily by putting this annotation on the field.
@Enumerated(value=EnumType.ORDINAL)
The DB layer will take care of
:} it is due to master moving faster then me being all over the code.
I have ported it once again to master and am busy testing again. but
we need it and have just moved to 4.1.1. I agree with you Alex. So we
will not release our fork just the patch via the earliest main
release. (I could publish
Alex, what do you mean by tag? Most of what I did is my personal
judgement, hardly any automation involved.
I hope we can give some folow up to this. I think the dev report is
useful. The users report is less useful however. I am lagging a week
behind. In most cases people would have answered if
I did a 4.0 - 4.1.1 - master
I can/will go back to 4.0 and report my findings tomorrow
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Harikrishna Patnala
harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com wrote:
Have you taken the DB dump before trying to upgrade.
Then you can build CS in 4.1.1 and apply the dump.
-Harikrishna
I agree with the string as db value. reordering or inserting a value,
which might make for a more logical order, will break backwards
compatibility using ordinals.
Daan
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Wido,
We actually have plenty of places that uses
someone broke the jenkins patch submission builds with a checkin. I
think no patch passes jenkins anymore because of the usage server not
building anymore. The patch build in my env in two different branches
(master and my work branch). The
Apache CloudStack Server4.6 sec my changes
Apache
Here's a simple (not recommended) one-nic setup:
http://marcus.mlsorensen.com/cloudstack-extras/cs-4.1-kvm-networking-one-nic.rtf
And a simple two-nic setup:
http://marcus.mlsorensen.com/cloudstack-extras/cs-4.1-kvm-networking-two-nic.rtf
Hasty docs put together on the road...
On Thu, Aug 1,
How would one enforce data disk selection?
I don't want to leave data disk blank in UI.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13198/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santhanam and Sheng Yang.
Repository:
Hi Daan,
Sorry I meant to subject tag your email so people who's interested in helping
can easily get to them.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 2:11 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: we like dev better then users
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13198/#review24488
---
Review 13198 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13198/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2013, 11:21 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13198/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2013, 11:31 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12958/#review24494
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On July 31, 2013, 10:10 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/
---
(Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 12:49 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang,
On Aug. 2, 2013, 12:29 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
Ship It!
Committed to 4.2 and MASTER.
- Sheng
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13198/#review24492
sure, this one allright?
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
Sorry I meant to subject tag your email so people who's interested in helping
can easily get to them.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland
So I have very limited knowledge on KVM. But, from my understanding from
Edison, we should consider what has to be done to fix this problem once it
occurs.
- Shutdown all VMs on all hosts that are affected.
- umount the nfs mount point
- Reestablish the storage pool.
- Restart the VMs.
Given
I see your point Marcus.
I felt that accessing the database would be simpler but you are right that
everyone may not have access to it. Actually the CS logs do mention the host
names as well but in a different place and based on that you can match the id
to a name. For e.g. if you look for
Hi,
Non Contiguous VLAN Ranges documentation is ready for review. The doc is
attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-804.
Please see section 11.9.2. Non Contiguous VLAN Ranges (88), and provide your
feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
Besides doc being allowed during this limited update period, I think tests
should also be an exception. Any comments?
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 12:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject:
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 10:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ACS42] Release Status Update: After Code Freeze Next Steps
Besides doc being allowed during this limited update
Could you provide a little more info about where in the GUI you'd like to
enforce the selection of a data disk? When kicking off a VM instance
perhaps?
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
How would one enforce data disk selection?
I don't want to leave
Hi,
I shall give you the complete picture on my doc tasks by EOD today.
You will get a quick update on my doc progress at
Hi Gaurav,
Port forwarding to work you need to create firewall rule also.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 01-Aug-2013, at 5:38 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
network - newt-name - IP Adresses - source nat adres -
configuration - Port Forwarding
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:09 PM,
87 matches
Mail list logo
