Congratulations Vijay.
From: anshul.gang...@citrix.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 05:55:27 +
Congrats Vijay!
On Saturday 10 August 2013 10:30 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
The Project Management
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13469/
---
(Updated Aug. 12, 2013, 6:48 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13490/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Wei Zhou.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Congrats Vijay!!
On Saturday 10 August 2013 10:30 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
asked Vijay Bhamidipati to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that they have accepted.
Being a committer allows many
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13491/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13469/#review24983
---
Commit 4c193a1b6950932698270828a831fcd994c7ae4a in branch
Hi,
I have the setup with latest code. When I tried to view the list if templates
without configuring zone , it is listing all the system vm templates and
default cent OS templates .
I have not observed this behavior before. Is it introduced intentionally or is
It a issue with API response ?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13469/#review24984
---
Commit be9dbcc2c5edb995c48558ea5e1a87c8d3012965 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13469/#review24985
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Aug. 12, 2013, 6:48 a.m.,
Congrats Vijay!
On Aug. 12, 2013, 8:25 a.m., Devdeep Singh wrote:
Ship It!
Thanks for reviewing and pushing the changes.
- Rajesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13469/#review24985
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13491/#review24987
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Hugo Trippaers
On Aug. 12, 2013, 7:14 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13493/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2909
On Aug. 12, 2013, 8:59 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Ship It!
master 062eab8df44ba76dad28800599d87ef131bb0bec
4.2 9d053d04ecd08ca3ae7cbf6d6530cf96c3007687
- Hugo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
Thanks! I'm going for the smallest patch of the year prize (1 character). :)
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13491/
On August 12th, 2013, 8:59
Congrats Vijay!
2013/8/12 Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie
Congrats Vijay!
Congrats!
:D
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com]
Sent: maandag 12 augustus 2013 11:12
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati
Congrats Vijay!
2013/8/12 Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie
Congrats Vijay!
:D This is going to be hard to beat unless we start counting the changes in
bits when indivdual characters change.
Cheers,
Hugo
From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.com]
Sent: maandag 12 augustus 2013 11:05
To: Hugo Trippaers
Cc: cloudstack
Subject: Re: Review Request 13491: Fix
I noticed that the upgrade sql script (earlier used to be schema-410to420.sql)
has been renamed and in the process all the change history is lost. Can we
ensure as a process to do a proper git file rename instead of creating a new
file so that the changes history is not lost? In this case is
We mark all the system and default templates as downloaded and during template
sync we remove the template entries that are not there.
I guess this we have introduced recently, this may cause listing all the
templates.
Thanks
Harikrishna
On 12-Aug-2013, at 1:46 PM, Sailaja Mada
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13318/#review24989
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On Aug. 6, 2013, 8:45
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13472/
---
(Updated Aug. 12, 2013, 10:24 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
See if this helps
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/repo?p=cloudstack.git;a=history;f=setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql;h=60335318c7b792a401cab36b8b456e652d47f2a6;hb=e61a38087d158da51f7b945d16e4749a83512ab5
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13472/
---
(Updated Aug. 12, 2013, 10:42 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
This is fine but is it possible to bring this history to the renamed file? Also
one has to know that there existed a file 410to420.sql.
-Original Message-
From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 4:07 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12941/#review24990
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Hugo Trippaers
On Aug. 1, 2013, 1:41 a.m.,
On Aug. 12, 2013, 11:30 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Ship It!
Targeted to the sdnextensions branch.
Commit id : 0d6125f36449b1fcbbc5d296496c4a01f2208fc4
- Hugo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12623/#review24992
---
Ship it!
I'm also OK with this patch. Documentation is pending,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13495/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4189
Prassana,
What is broken? Do you have some details (just got back from some time off, so
i might have missed a few mails)
By the way on the subject on gerrit, we had this discussion before. If anyone
wants to refresh the arguments from last time:
http://markmail.org/message/inerurmjtc6v57ba
H, (Prasanna?)
Can I run the integration tests at Schuberg Philis' and what do I need
to do so? If there is document on how to set up these (and smoke
tests) can I get a link?
You may know; I want to get some work on vpc gateways on sdn accepted.
regards,
Is there more to say about
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/
?
Is it commit worthy? or if not what is missing?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13493/#review24996
---
Commit 86d2e8bdae1e7edef013a9cf01dbf2dee7528531 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13495/#review24995
---
Commit 2eceb7dcbe767f0f8a6cc3fb15655fb10d330406 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13493/#review24998
---
Commit ead3b848d5652b4b8b2619e617af2bb9f025fc26 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13495/#review24997
---
Commit 5510bca9e5223730dc469b443b50d26550533360 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13493/#review25000
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Aug. 12, 2013, 9:02 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13495/#review24999
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Aug. 12, 2013, 12:28 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13472/#review25001
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jayapal Reddy
On Aug. 12, 2013, 10:42 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13496/
---
Review request for cloudstack, anthony xu, Abhinandan Prateek, Chiradeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13490/#review25003
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Wei Zhou
On Aug. 12, 2013, 6:57 a.m., Jijun
On Aug. 12, 2013, 1:37 p.m., Wei Zhou wrote:
Ship It!
committed: 8d53887cec514e1eeed899e4d6b6465b02aa39a3 in master, and
df1756b6197f42abff6a01c55a1b1cbfc9d83eb5 in 4.2
- Wei
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
Hi guys
My company has a project to delivery support of VxLAN network , using
CloudStack.
I know the version 4.x does not support vxlan.
So I wonder what the plan to support vxlan network .
We have a team about 5 guys in charge of developing the feature,
So if there is anybody in this
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:44 AM, 曹建林 caojian...@outlook.com wrote:
Hi guys
My company has a project to delivery support of VxLAN network , using
CloudStack.
I know the version 4.x does not support vxlan.
So I wonder what the plan to support vxlan network .
We have a team about 5 guys
Apart from false failures because of wrongly targetted branch I saw the
job fail the build on master for patches that were to be applied on
master. Haven't seen the job reporting in the last few days however.
Have you started on the fix for the branch mapping? If not - I could
start taking a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11942/#review25005
---
Hi Reviewers,
Any feedback on this patch? :)
- Laszlo Hornyak
only two unanswerred mails on users last week:
http://markmail.org/message/rxl5mwhj2xgmm24e Does CS support Xen XCP?
by Jason Pavao
http://markmail.org/message/pgchyajufif5ylwi Why can't I choose a
different network offering? by Nux!
regards,
Daan
sounds great Ron,
I'm sure I am not the guy you need for this but I'll keep an eye on
it. The 'someone who actually knows what it s supposed to say' is
bound to be around on this list or dev.
regards,
Daan
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Ron Wheeler
rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote:
I
does this only happen on a new installation/clean db? Sounds like
admin account not enabled yet.
Daan
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
Date: Tue, Aug 6,
Mike,
expunging is not a reply to an api call, destroying is. I have been
wondering about this as well but I think I just came up with the
answer (cs gurus:}?)
regards,
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm curious when I should expect the
http://markmail.org/message/jrgonqu5lmgscgnl Deleting affinity group
while it's still in use by Gaurav Aradhye
http://markmail.org/message/3brunuewgccrfmfy Upgrading form 4.1.0 to
4.1.1 success; some issues with console proxy by France
regards,
I would imagine that pane to refresh every so often, reflecting against the
view. meaning after a vm is expunged, it should disappear from that view.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
Mike,
expunging is not a reply to an api call, destroying is. I
Can committer review https://reviews.apache.org/r/13317/, please?
regards,
Daan
Daan,
This is possible. All the tests are under test/integration.
test/integration/smoke - bvt
test/integration/component - feature specific tests
I'll assume you have cloudstack setup manually and just want to fire
all the tests against this deployment. This could be your laptop from
where you
Did you attach a patch to this? I see nothing.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Can committer review https://reviews.apache.org/r/13317/, please?
regards,
Daan
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
I got around this by running the CS server as root. Would that be an option for
you, Mike?
On Aug 12, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
does this only happen on a new installation/clean db? Sounds like
admin account not enabled yet.
Daan
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013
yes,
it contains
_upgradeMap.put(4.1.1, new DbUpgrade[] { new
Upgrade410to420(), new Upgrade420to430() });
to add to the DatabaseUpgradeChecker
Daan
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Did you attach a patch to this? I see nothing.
On Mon, Aug 12,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:20:58PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
A bit of a stupid question, I guess
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
...
I'll assume you have cloudstack setup manually and just want to fire
all the tests against this deployment.
This seems introduced by storage refactoring where we have gotten rid of
previous direct sql to use db view to search for templates. Please file a
bug for this.
Thanks
-min
On 8/12/13 1:16 AM, Sailaja Mada sailaja.m...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I have the setup with latest code. When I tried to
Yeah, it seems to only happen when I have a fresh install.
I also notice - in this situation - that I get a password prompt in my
console when trying to upload an ISO for the first time.
Chris - I once wondered about running the CS MS as root, but someone warned
me not to because it might cover
I'm just going to chime in on this. What we need to put together is a primer.
Our docs work fairly well and are CloudStack centric, which I see as most
peoples issue. On the topic of networking, building a cloud requires a very
strong understanding of core Linux networking, which is technically
Prasanna,
I checked out the marvin and tst setuyp pages.
I have marvin
$ python
Python 2.7.3 (default, Dec 18 2012, 13:50:09)
[GCC 4.5.3] on cygwin
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
import marvin;
marvin
module 'marvin' from
One last note. As far as stability is concerned... 4.1.x is the recommended
build, and many of us(myself included) are running our production on 4.0.2
which is rock solid for all standard features.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Kelcey Jamison Damage kel...@bbits.ca
To:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13499/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Sebastien Goasguen and Hugo Trippaers.
Mike,
If you create a cloudstack-management package and run
cloudstack-setup-management before starting the management server you can
run the MS as user cloud without experiencing these issues...
It sets up the correct privileges.
Pedro.
On Aug 12, 2013, at 9:47 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
On Aug. 12, 2013, 11:38 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
I'm also OK with this patch. Documentation is pending, but i'm fine with
committing this to master. It needs a rebase to the latest state of master,
but after that we should commit this. OK Chiradeep?
OK.
- Chiradeep
3 +1 votes, and the vote passes. I will update the by-laws now.
Thanks!
On 6 August 2013 20:06, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 1:58 PM
To:
Ignore this. Unfortunately, we only have 2 +1 votes from the PMC. I am
going to try to get a third. Sorry for the confusion.
On 12 August 2013 18:55, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
3 +1 votes, and the vote passes. I will update the by-laws now.
Thanks!
On 6 August 2013 20:06,
Bumping the thread for a 3rd +1 vote from the PMC. Our by-laws stipulate we
need 3 +1 PMC votes.
Thanks.
On 5 August 2013 22:43, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Hi dev,
I have some more by-law changes to propose. This is essentially round 2
for these changes. I incorporated feedback
I get The following:
From badb31ba4f5b1ed833a4509bd65a02d2977e41dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daan Hoogland dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 10:26:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] db upgrade 4.1.1 - master
---
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java | 2 ++
Ah, thanks, Pedro
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Pedro Roque Marques
pedro.r.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike,
If you create a cloudstack-management package and run
cloudstack-setup-management before starting the management server you
can run the MS as user cloud without experiencing
Thanks Rohit, Bharat, Sanjay, Abhinav, Hari, Issac, Radhika, Animesh, Likitha,
Saksham, Anshul, Krishnan, Sadhu, Ian, Wei, Hugo! ^_^
Regards,
Vijay
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 2:13 AM
To:
Has anyone else been seeing this?
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Midokura Midonet ... FAILURE [1.864s]
It doesn't happen all the time, but I've seen it three times in a row now.
I assume it's a test failure, but I haven't looked into it much.
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack
Often times if I do a clean, then install, it fixes the problem.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Has anyone else been seeing this?
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Midokura Midonet ... FAILURE [1.864s]
It doesn't happen all the
Hi all,
I've hit a problem that I have been chewing on for the past few hours. A
few months ago I changed the local storage path naming convention (examples
below) and updated the corresponding records in the cloudstack database
manually. This works great until old templates are used. I
just dawned on me, you might have to forget the storage pools (if no vm's
are running) on the hosts. Then reconnect the kvm agents (by restarting the
service on the hosts or from cloudstack- force reconnect command). they
should get programmed correctly!
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Marty
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11942/#review25036
---
Ship it!
This is very straightforward patch. Java filesystem api
Laszlo,
I was only concerned about the lack of asserts in the original test case. That
has been updated, so it looks good to me now.
Thanks,
-John
On Aug 12, 2013, at 5:43 PM, Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com wrote:
---
This is an
has there been any further discussion that I might have missed around
ipv6 in VPC?
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Hi Dave,
I am glad it fits your need. That's our target. :)
--Sheng
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote:
Copying Hugo
-Original Message-
From: frank zhang (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:08 PM
To: cloudstack-iss...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4149) [upgrade][2.2.13 -
2.2.14 - 4.2][KVM] When we try to upgrade the KVM agent
Hi Hugo:
I have an issue needing to double confirm with you.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4149
In short, we used to make old cloud-daemonize obsolete using
cloudstack-management that makes it unnecessarily installed during upgrading
KVM agent(cloud-agent) on
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13459/#review25039
---
please update your test result
- Frank Zhang
On Aug. 10, 2013,
Hi Mike,
If you get a failure like this, Maven should also print out more details on
the cause -
could you paste those?
4.2 was building fine for me yesterday, but I'll take a look and see if
something has changed since.
Thanks for the heads up,
Dave.
2013年8月13日火曜日 Mike Tutkowski
Is this really needed for 4.2? 4.2 is in limited updates and only
blocker/critical bug fixes and doc and test updates are allowed. All commits to
4.2 should have associated BUG id.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Zhang [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Frank
Zhang
Emm. Actually it's not a blocker or even critical for 4.2.
Though I thought it's not harm, if needs I can revert it from 4.2 but still
keep it in master.
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:37 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Frank Zhang;
We should keep it for master
-Original Message-
From: Frank Zhang
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:40 PM
To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; John Burwell
Cc: Laszlo Hornyak
Subject: RE: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup
Emm. Actually it's not a blocker or
Hello Mr. 曹,
I'm currently working on VXLAN specifically to KVM with Linux Bridge (not OVS)
and Multicast mode.
I think some network plugin also supports (or will support) VXLAN as tunneling
protocol.
For what environment (KVM, Xen, VMware (Nexus 1kV maybe?), etc.) and which type
of VXLAN
ProcessUtilTest is missing Apache License Header and failing rat-test
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:40 PM
To: Frank Zhang; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; John Burwell
Cc: Laszlo Hornyak
Subject: RE:
I reverted it from 4.2. now is adding the Apache header to master
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:56 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Frank Zhang; John Burwell
Cc: Laszlo Hornyak
Subject: RE: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup
Hi Mike,
I'm not seeing any failures with the latest 4.2.
It sounds like the failure you were seeing was intermittent, so if it crops
up again, just paste in some more logs and I'll take a look.
Thanks,
Dave.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13496/#review25048
---
#1. if you add fork to the TCP_LISTEN option of SOCAT, then it will
I kind of lost the plot (perhaps because I was missing for a few weeks). I
didn't get why we need the change (or perhaps it is reverting an older
change?)
On 8/12/13 5:47 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there more to say about
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/
?
Is it
Hi All,
There are still 200+ critical and blocker defects pending to be validated. Even
if a small %age of these gets rejected, that would cause quality issues for
release. Pl make sure to close these ASAP. First column shows Total defects and
second column shows Blocker/Critical. You can
Hi,
When you spin up a VM based on an ISO, you have to specify the hypervisor.
Just curious, but why does the user pick this?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
Alena/Murali,
Can one of you review and cleanup Hyper-V specific entries??
Thanks
/sudha
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 3:40 PM
To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers
Cc: Sudha Ponnaganti; Murali Reddy
Subject: RE:
One reason is that unlike the hypervisor specific templates, there's no
such information predetermined. Consider a cloudstack zone with both xen
and KVM clusters. User needs to choose which hypervisor to deploy in. Its
also important since the resulting install from iso will be in the chosen
Sudha,
Devdeep had removed the HyperV config yesterday.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 8:13 AM
To: Donal Lafferty; Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers
Cc:
Yeah, I guess I thought the end user wasn't generally concerned about
hypervisors...that CloudStack typically handles that, but maybe CloudStack
is more responsible for handling which cluster of the same hypervisor type
to place a new VM on.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Marcus Sorensen
So this fixes the specific problem referred to, but it also leaves
some crud around.
Historically (2.2.x and 3.0.x) -daemonize was required by
-console-proxy -usage, and -agent. At a minimum this likely means that
you'll need to add a similar obsoletes to -usage, or folks with -usage
installed
Thanks Min. Jira ticket @
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4277
Regards,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 10:16 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS42] Listtemplates API respone
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
