---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13680/#review25403
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Aug. 21, 2013, 10:47
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13727/#review25404
---
test/integration/component/test_stopped_vm.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13727/
---
(Updated Aug. 22, 2013, 6:19 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13727/
---
(Updated Aug. 22, 2013, 6:20 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13730/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Sateesh Chodapuneedi.
Bugs:
Adding Chiradeep for guidance, as Murali seems to be away at the moment.
Prasanna kindly verified that this is an issue with Virtual Router as well
as MidoNet, so I have filed a bug against 4.2:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4442
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Dave Cahill
Done
-Original Message-
From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 4:58 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: Please cherry pick 2 doc fixes
From 4.2-forward:
(1)
Commit
Please apply on 4.2. cherry-pick from 502b2ff0f
Signed-off-by: Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org
---
test/integration/component/test_project_usage.py |5 +++--
test/integration/component/test_usage.py |6 +++---
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13728/#review25407
---
Ship it!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Aug. 22, 2013, 5:48 a.m.,
Hi folks,
I am troubled by:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/user/registerSSHKeyPair.html
It says that it returns the private key . This can't be right.
I tried it with cloudmonkey and it does not return the private key (does not
know it..)
Unless I am missing something with
Marcus,
I recall a mail in this list where a naming convention was mentioned.
Look along those lines for categories.
regards,
Daan
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I've spent a few minutes trying to figure out how API commands are linked
with their
Hello,
you have to use the keypair with:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/domain_admin/resetSSHKeyForVirtualMachine.html
for reset on vm
Il 22/08/2013 10:51, Sebastien Goasguen ha scritto:
Hi folks,
I am troubled by:
Hi,
RegisterSSHKey API is used when we have SSH key pair and if we want to register
that key pair in Cloudstack.
So when we provide public key it just calculates fingerprint and registers the
SSH key pair.
CS doesn't know about private key. It just returns null as private key.
Our doc is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13731/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13732/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Kelven Yang and Prachi Damle.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13560/
---
(Updated Aug. 22, 2013, 10:27 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13733/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4447
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13734/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4448
it's not returned at all..
so even if it's stored as null in the db, the apidoc should not say it returns
'privatkey'
thoughts ?
On Aug 22, 2013, at 5:31 AM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
*privatekey is set to null if registerSSHKeyPair
*
2013/8/22 Sebastien Goasguen
Did you seed the secondary storage with the systemvm template before starting
the setup? If not, can you check if under your secondary storage the
../template/tmpl/1/1 directory is present?
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Amit Das [mailto:amit@cloudbyte.com]
Sent:
LS
See also:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4374
Cheers,
Roeland
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: donderdag 22 augustus 2013 12:32
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: HA redundant virtual router
LS,
Schuberg
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13731/#review25412
---
test/integration/smoke/test_cpu_memory_overcommit.py
Hi,
I have not seeded the secondary storage with system vm template.
The directory ../template/tmpl/1/1 is not present.
Regards,
Amit
*CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Devdeep Singh devdeep.si...@citrix.comwrote:
Did you seed the secondary storage
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13731/#review25413
---
test/integration/smoke/test_cpu_memory_overcommit.py
Please follow the link to seed the system template
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#prepare-system-vm-template
-Harikrishna
On 22-Aug-2013, at 5:08 PM, Amit Das amit@cloudbyte.com
wrote:
Hi,
I
We generate docs based on the response object. Since we use the same response
object for create/register ssh key pair APIs, doc shows same return values.
We follow this for all API responses. Say list virtual machine API response
does not include all the fields that are in api doc.
-Harikrishna
On Aug 22, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Harikrishna Patnala
harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com wrote:
We generate docs based on the response object. Since we use the same response
object for create/register ssh key pair APIs, doc shows same return values.
We follow this for all API responses. Say list
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13735/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13736/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository:
Animesh,
Please apply bbe8a6d266cd9aff659b697ea1fcbc36ec854f5a from 4.2-forward to 4.2
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/4.2-forward a0f23d0f9 - bbe8a6d26
CLOUDSTACK-4115 : Encrypt password in cluster_details table. This fix is to
handle upgrades from versions earlier than 3.0.5 and 4.0. Upgrade
I made a commit in 4.2-forward, will wait for BVT to run before raising a
pull request to 4.2.
On 22/08/13 12:12 PM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote:
Adding Chiradeep for guidance, as Murali seems to be away at the moment.
Prasanna kindly verified that this is an issue with Virtual
Hi,
I am working on couple defects around upgrade, and I am trying understand the
history behind the various upgrade paths in 4.x.
In the RN, I could see an upgrade path from 3.0.2 to 4.1, but not 3.0.x to 4.x.
If you have worked on upgrade/ RN, please help me understand why 3.0.x to 4.2
Sounds great Murali, thanks for the quick response!
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.comwrote:
I made a commit in 4.2-forward, will wait for BVT to run before raising a
pull request to 4.2.
On 22/08/13 12:12 PM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote:
From: Sudha Ponnaganti
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 7:02 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS42] Upgrade from 4.0 and 4.1 to 4.2
Hi,
Reaching out to community to see if someone would be interested to upgrade from
ACS 4.0/4.1 to ACS 4.2. If you do, can you share your results
Thanks Wei.
I am trying to find out whether
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4185 applies to all the
upgrade path.
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 7:39 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Greetings,I find the following open on my Cloud Management Server.PORT STATE SERVICE22/tcp open ssh23/tcp filtered telnet111/tcp open rpcbind2049/tcp open nfs5900/tcp open vnc5901/tcp open vnc-15902/tcp open vnc-25903/tcp open vnc-35904/tcp open unknown5906/tcp open
Are you using this host as both CloudStack management and also hypervisor?
I have several instances of ACS installed, I don't have telnet or vnc enabled
by default. This is indicative of your server configuration (and services
installed) and not cloudstack.
From: Maurice Lawler
Yes, it's all under one server; KVM.On Aug 22, 2013, at 10:56 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" imusa...@webmd.net wrote:Are you using this host as both CloudStack management and also hypervisor? I have several instances of ACS installed, I don't have telnet or vnc enabled by default. This is indicative of
Thanks, in looking through the mail history, I can see various
suggestions of adding categories to gen_toc.py, but I don't see a
concrete explanation of how this works. In experimenting it seems that
the category is matched against the api command name. That seems quite
limiting from a third party
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13732/#review25417
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kelven Yang
On Aug. 22, 2013, 10:27 a.m.,
I am working on preparing for RC and we have a CHANGES file that lists new
features and critical fixes. In ACS 4.2 we have resolved 800+ blocker and
critical issues and it seems impractical to list such a huge list in the file.
I am considering putting in a link to a public JIRA filter
+1 on JIRA filter
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 10:23 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS42] CHANGES file
I am working on preparing for RC and we have a CHANGES file that lists new
features
There's code that changes the default value if the default value in the db
differs from the default value of the current cloudstack codebase. Can't
change value itself because that's set by the sysadmin. So as an upgrade step,
we set it to value. And then if it varies from the current
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
I am working on preparing for RC and we have a CHANGES file that lists new
features and critical fixes. In ACS 4.2 we have resolved 800+ blocker and
critical issues and it seems impractical to list such
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 10:26 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS42] CHANGES file
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
I am working on
Alex,
I'm quite interested in a common dynamic settings/configuration framework
and looked a little bit at what you've done with ConfigDepot. I think I do
want to take it little further though. I'll have to write up what I'm
thinking, but that won't probably come until next week. But I will
I am cherry-picking few fixes for the RC build and just when I am ready to push
to the repo it fails with following error
$ git push origin 4.2
Password for 'https://anim...@git-wip-us.apache.org':
error: no DAV locking support on
I should mention that I tried a different host with a newer got client and
it said 502 proxy error. Do we need to contact infra?
On Aug 22, 2013 3:28 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I got the same thing.
On Aug 22, 2013 3:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
Same here. I've tried pushing to both master and 4.2-forward. I can git pull
fine, but it just hangs forever when I try to git push. Maybe something up with
the authentication system?
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent:
I have created INFRA ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6686
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 2:29 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Git repo down error: no DAV locking support
I
seems fixed
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
I have created INFRA ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6686
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13128/#review25435
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Brian Federle
On Aug. 2, 2013, 1:37 p.m.,
Need to apply a0de0d0177a9251756d57ebdbea93f51a597ac1f and
d157e2970ebd6d8d4c5a98a6d2adbc5da013f59b on 4.2
During the automation test, sometimes, KVM can't find volume, so add the code
to look up volume for a few times(refresh storage pool).
I was not able to cherry-pick a0de0d0177a9251756d57ebdbea93f51a597ac1f
Gave error fatal: badobject
From: Edison Su
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 3:29 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: [ACS42]CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456
Need to apply
Hi Animesh,
Can you please cherry-pick the following two commits to 4.2?
52f08a4f36c35ac9827a1d253b000bfcd6f9d723 (CLOUDSTACK-4454)
18aacd48a2cac2f66b6ff7c70a73dc39b8d6ece1 (CLOUDSTACK-4455)
Thanks
-min
Done, pushing to 4.2 as soon as the build completes
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 3:42 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: [ACS42] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-4454 and CLOUDSTACK-4455
Hi Animesh,
Can you
Please cherry-pick following commit from MASTER for fixing CLOUDSTACK-4199.
Thanks!
--Sheng
commit 2a26823ec19524051dd3cc11a338b36e2cecf437
Author: Sheng Yang sheng.y...@citrix.com
Date: Thu Aug 22 17:45:12 2013 -0700
CLOUDSTACK-4199: Only use ifdown/ifup for the un-configured eth2
It's a design choice, the only reason is it would be a very complex
situation to deal with. In fact the redundant router itself's policy has
already been very complex...
We didn't look into details at the time of implementing redundant router,
but there are lots of concerns e.g. a network glitch
Hi Wei,
I have a question about the disk throttling feature you implemented in 4.2.
Is it for KVM only?
If so, are there any plans to extend it to other hypervisors going forward?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o:
Thanks!
--Sheng
commit 8daf3e3c23158cdab09af05b5f3a29fd2d9ca501
Author: Sheng Yang sheng.y...@citrix.com
Date: Thu Aug 22 19:17:54 2013 -0700
CLOUDSTACK-1670: Fix multiple nic routing issue when dhcp_release
available
dnsmasq.conf need to contain /etc/dhcpopts.txt from the beginning,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13759/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4466
Repository:
Hi Animesh,
There is a bug related to concurrent xenserver snapshot, currently, we
don't support take concurrent snapshot on one volume, so need to disable it.
Previously, A volume state machine is used to prevent concurrent snapshot, but
it's not enough, so acquire a table lock on
The step worked fine after seeding system VM into secondary storage
location.
However, i see the next error:
WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-446:) Catch Exception
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException on
host:21318624-cfd9-412d-aeb4-b1418424f287 for template:
this usually indicates that you missed the step where you prep vhd-util on
the hypervisor.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Amit Das amit@cloudbyte.com wrote:
The step worked fine after seeding system VM into secondary storage
location.
However, i see the next error:
WARN
Yes. The step was missed.
However, i tried out the steps on 'vhd_util' later restarted nfs, rpcbind
management services.
Do i need to reset the DB as well ?
Is there any work around for this ?
Regards,
Amit
*CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Ahmad
Radhika,
Cloudstack-4185 applies to upgrades from 4.0 and 4.1 only. Upgrades from
3.0.2 and earlier won't require this workaround.
~kishan
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2013 11:09 PM
To:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13734/#review25458
---
Ship it!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Aug. 22, 2013, 10:53 a.m.,
Got it. Thank you. Will close this issue.
-Radhika
-Original Message-
From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 10:25 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Subject: RE: About the Upgrade Path in 4.X
Radhika,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13736/#review25459
---
Gaurav, there's more occurrences of is_snapshot_on_nfs in the same
Hello
Is it possible to make site-to-site VPN connection between VPC and VPC on
CloudStack?
Thanks
Kimi
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 2:38 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Not now. But I think it's in the road map.
--Sheng
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Kimihiko Kitase
kimihiko.kit...@citrix.co.jp wrote:
Hello
Is it possible to make site-to-site VPN connection between VPC and VPC on
CloudStack?
Thanks
Kimi
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad
71 matches
Mail list logo
