---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13805/#review25598
---
Commit bdbdfd401b0fcd40244e6aedf2ae853853e75e1a in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4482
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13803/#review25599
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- venkata swamy babu budumuru
On Aug. 26,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 6:20 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
Hi Suresh/Sanjeev,
Thanks for the inputs.
I tried making partition manually and it works, the new partition is then
listed. However it is little complex through doing that through test case.
Simple reboot does the same thing, it is listing out the new partitions
after the reboot. Apparently the
Hi All,
I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2
Commit: 9103984d349927a87b0683048dda2d8004e6854f
List of changes:
During MS restart as part of host connect, vm sync happens. This may be
stopping VMs if there is a mismatch in actual state and what is present in the
database. Do you see anything useful in the MS logs?
-Koushik
On 27-Aug-2013, at 4:20 AM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
I've been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13803/#review25600
---
Commit 239281a401f09df9519bb8e8637c2060b9be019b in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13803/#review25601
---
Commit 6334b738d048591c6ded39f9ad3f448a2454b03d in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 6:51 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 06:36:53AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2
Commit:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 6:59 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin
Cool Gaurav and you can do without reboot also and it's up to you choose which
one is feasible to you .
General way:
echo - - - /sys/class/scsi_host/host listings here/scan[ search for
linux scan lun with out reboot]
eg:
echo - - - /sys/class/scsi_host/host1/scan
or reboot the vm
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 7:42 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 7:53 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:06:37PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
ok, the down side will be that the semantics of the versioning are
confusing when cloudstack 5 comes and the version numbers don't match.
still a +1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13805/#review25602
---
Commit c059dacfc49b0757e4cd78498fef0d424a462c54 in branch
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking at what it's going to take to get CloudMonkey out as an
official release.
Thanks Chip for taking this further.
Here's what I believe needs to be done:
1) Legal doc check (I think we're
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 8:17 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin
On Aug. 27, 2013, 5:33 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/base.py, line 891
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13806/diff/1/?file=344716#file344716line891
extract works on an existing Image/Template. Why should it be a
classmethod?
Hi folks,
I'm not able to participate on the MLs and contribute code to the
project for past couple of months now. So, I reached out to the pmc
and some friends on the ML on this issue. Right now the project bylaws
has no information on committer moving to emeritus status so I just
want to tell
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
I have always preferred two spaces because xml can be indented so far so
quickly
I must +1 and a lot this argument of Alex' But sleep tight anyway
Darren. No killing issue.
Hi Sheng,
Thanks for your reply. I'll see if we can replay this scenario.
With respect to point 1: a good principal IMHO.
Point 2: Why do we force a keepalived node to become master and not wait for
keepalived to become master? This way there is less reason to intervene and
less risk of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13856/#review25606
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jayapal Reddy
On Aug. 27, 2013, 10:23 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13856/#review25607
---
Commit 6e64fa53c62d927e6dc4c0053abc5d3f9f8329dc in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 10:47 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 10:51 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 10:53 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/#review25610
---
server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/#review25611
---
Commit 37d500d2a6b71c267af20a83208eb6049157f95f in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/#review25612
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Aug. 27, 2013, 10:53 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/#review25614
---
Commit 81938c68acd3a049aa0fcb0c5ea8bc4a822d3200 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 11:20 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13771/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 11:36 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
Jessica,
I have provided my review comments in the bug CLOUDSTACK-864.
Thanks,
~Talluri
On 27/08/13 3:21 AM, Jessica Tomechak jessica.tomec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
New doc on zone-wide primary storage is ready for review. You can view the
updated text at the links below. Or -- since there
On Aug. 26, 2013, 10:09 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
test/integration/component/cpu_limits/test_project_limits.py, line 275
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13001/diff/3/?file=338935#file338935line275
use listResourceLimits API to get the resource limits of respective
account/domain.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13001/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2013, noon)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13559/#review25613
---
test/integration/component/test_portable_ip.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/#review25615
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On Aug. 27, 2013, 11:20 a.m.,
Hi All,
I was performing some operations related to snapshots and templates on VMWare
with CS 4.2.
Initiated create snapshot and while that was in processing tried to create
template from another existing snapshot.
In /var/log/cloud.log I could see logs related to snapshot creation process but
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12545/#review25616
---
Hi Girish Shilamkar,
Apologies for late review.
Some changes needs
How were the changes tested?
-Original Message-
From: daan Hoogland [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of
daan Hoogland
Sent: 27 August 2013 12:37
To: Sheng Yang; Dave Cahill; Chiradeep Vittal; Hugo Trippaers
Cc: daan Hoogland; cloudstack
Subject: Re: Review Request
Donal,
These were tested creating and deleting various types of networks with clients.
to be precise:
a standard network
a bridged network
a nicira based network
a standard vpc with two tiert networks.
kind regards,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Donal Lafferty
donal.laffe...@citrix.com
On 08/25/2013 07:20 AM, Edison Su wrote:
There is a bug in libvirt 0.10.2+:
/* Short-circuit if already mounted */
385http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c;h=d305b063ffd9dd01683e9105cfc6902948537ca4;hb=HEAD#l385
if ((rc =
On Aug 19, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
On XenServer (from Citrix), there is no JVM, not sure if you can install
it even after the open sourcing.
I'd be surprised if you could not do it on Xen Project.
On 8/19/13 10:38 AM, Sebastien Goasguen
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
refs/heads/4.2
Commit: 9103984d349927a87b0683048dda2d8004e6854f
I notice Edison's fix is missing although it is on 4.2. Is this
intended?
[Animesh] Edison checked it in after I cut
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13001/#review25619
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me.
- Sanjay Tripathi
On Aug. 27, 2013,
Hi,
In a commit in May I enabled the deployment of SystemVMs on RBD, but
this was unintentionally reverted by a different commit (merge).
I didn't notice this up until now and fixed it in both master and
4.2-forward.
Can 3315159de62620166c119dbf72dad9cf661cc0cb be cherry-picked to 4.2?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:29:51PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
refs/heads/4.2
Commit: 9103984d349927a87b0683048dda2d8004e6854f
I notice Edison's fix is missing although it
Just to throw in my two cents. I personally think the effort of adding a new
hypervisor to CloudStack is too difficult. This is an area I'd like to focus
on, along with another 15 things :)
I personally see a motivation for an xl integration. This is something I've
researched in the past
On Aug 27, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just to throw in my two cents. I personally think the effort of adding a new
hypervisor to CloudStack is too difficult. This is an area I'd like to focus
on, along with another 15 things :)
I personally
On 08/27/2013 05:20 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:29:51PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
refs/heads/4.2
Commit: 9103984d349927a87b0683048dda2d8004e6854f
I notice
Hi,
Can you cherry-pick 93b40b0ca6a796ffbacd80c40897f6ada6284bc4 into 4.2?
It fixes CLOUDSTACK-4423 and enables RBD volumes to be migrated to other
primary storages.
Thank you!
Wido
Wido, with all due respect, the data shows that the RC is ready.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12320942
There's 2 blockers, both of which existed prior to 4.2
QA is merely going to repeat the test cases they already executed?
Are we hoping they are going to
Hi guys,
Do we have Network object in KVM hypervisor plugin? I see the
LibvirtNetworkDef but it's unused. I wonder how ACS manage Networks on KVM
hosts?
Thanks,
--
N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
Hi all, was curious to know if there are other flavors of CloudStack
besides CloudPlatform.
Anybody have some insight in that space?
Thanks.
David La Motta
Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp
Direct: 1.919.476.5042
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:12 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 05:46:24PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 11:56 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 06:36:53AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Hi All,
Not that I am aware of. Also I believe once ACS 4.2 is released, ACS and
CCP will be the same code base. I could be wrong.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:24 PM, La Motta, David
david.lamo...@netapp.comwrote:
Hi all, was curious to know if there are other flavors of CloudStack
besides
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13759/#review25630
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sheng Yang
On Aug. 23, 2013, 11:31 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13759/#review25629
---
Commit a55c75bbd201e53f0aca3e8f8f9dee08cd132a95 in branch
On Aug. 27, 2013, 7:08 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
Ship It!
I've pushed to 4.2-forwarding.
But Dave, could you rebase to master? I cannot apply it clearly on MASTER.
Also, it's better to use git-format-patch to generated patch.
Thanks!
- Sheng
Hi Dave,
I've committed your patch to 4.2-forwarding.
But it cannot apply on MASTER, so please rebase it.
And it would be better if you use git-format-patch to generate patch.
Thanks!
--Sheng
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote:
Hi Sheng,
Thanks for
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Ian Duffy to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that he has accepted.
Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
project since there is no need to go via the patch
submission process. This should
What's your timeframe you'd like to see here? Do you plan on working on this
yourself or are you looking for some people from the community to take this up.
I have some interest in this. I'd like to enhance ACS to make adding
hypervisors easier and using xen arm as a POC would be good. I
Welcome Ian!
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:17 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Ian Duffy
wooohooo! congrats Ian!
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
wooohooo! congrats Ian!
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.comwrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Ian Duffy to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that he has accepted.
Being a committer enables easier
On Aug 27, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
What's your timeframe you'd like to see here? Do you plan on working on this
yourself or are you looking for some people from the community to take this
up.
Opennebula has already demoed it, so I think we
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:24 PM, La Motta, David
david.lamo...@netapp.com wrote:
Hi all, was curious to know if there are other flavors of CloudStack
besides CloudPlatform.
Anybody have some insight in that space?
Thanks.
So naturally there is Citrix - and they produce a product based on
CloudSand... http://www.cloudsand.com/
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Todd Pigram t...@toddpigram.com wrote:
Not that I am aware of. Also I believe once ACS 4.2 is released, ACS and
CCP will be the same code base. I could be wrong.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:24 PM, La Motta, David
My understanding of future of CPP was the same as Todd's. Post ACS 4.2 release,
it will be the same code base -just a different name and support.
I manage a flavor of CloudStack called CloudSand, but its only to bring most
needed features from dev branch into a stable release - with ability to
Cancelling this round, I will pick up the outstanding cheery-picks and start
another round later today
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 11:37 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)
Thanks guys. It been a great experience so far! Learning lots and very fast.
On 27 August 2013 20:22, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
Welcome Ian!
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:17 PM
To:
Cherry picked this commit for next 4.2 RC build
-Original Message-
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Sheng
Yang
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 12:10 PM
To: Hugo Trippaers
Cc: Sheng Yang; Dave Cahill; cloudstack
Subject: Re: Review Request 13759: Fix
I am working on cutting another RC build later today, I am picking up the
latest cherry pick requests and some of the important issues that got fixed
recently. If there are specific fixes that are needed or in progress call me
out to wait.
Thanks
Animesh
Interesting, and thanks for the replies. I had not heard of CloudSand, so
thanks for bringing it up.
David La Motta
Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp
Direct: 1.919.476.5042
On 8/27/13 3:28 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
My understanding of future of CPP
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13759/#review25634
---
Commit 41d2fb3d1704273042fbd02d85a276b2ec00c737 in branch
Done will be in next RC build
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 8:07 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS42] Please cherry-pick
3315159de62620166c119dbf72dad9cf661cc0cb
Hi,
In a commit in May I enabled
Done will be in next RC build
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 9:37 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS42] Cherry-pick for CLOUDSTACK-4423
(93b40b0ca6a796ffbacd80c40897f6ada6284bc4)
Hi,
Can you
I haven't heard CloudSand either, interesting...
Thanks
On Tuesday, August 27, 2013, La Motta, David wrote:
Interesting, and thanks for the replies. I had not heard of CloudSand, so
thanks for bringing it up.
David La Motta
Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13864/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Alena Prokharchyk.
Repository:
Hi Animesh,
Please cherry-pick the following commit from 4.2-forward branch.
commit a55c75bbd201e53f0aca3e8f8f9dee08cd132a95
Author: Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com
Date: Tue Aug 27 11:55:49 2013 -0700
CLOUDSTACK-4466: Fix DHCP capability breaks in 4.2 for MidoNet
A recent code
Done
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 1:29 PM
To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS42] CLOUDSTACK-4466: Fix DHCP capability breaks in 4.2 for MidoNet
Hi Animesh,
Please cherry-pick the following commit from 4.2-forward branch.
From 4.2-forward.
(1)
*Commit:* 2d08a322dd976e696783535a0f3d174483adf155 [2d08a32]
*Parents:* a55c75bbd2 rev://a55c75bbd201e53f0aca3e8f8f9dee08cd132a95
*Author:* Jessica jessica.tomec...@citrix.com
*Date:* August 27, 2013 1:37:40 PM PDT
CLOUDSTACK-2121. DOC. New docs for affinity groups.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13865/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4527
Repository:
Done
-Original Message-
From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 2:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: Please cherry pick 2 doc fixes
From 4.2-forward.
(1)
*Commit:*
Mike,
If you constantly encounter this error in a fresh VMware API session, you
need to check the parameter you passed into the API call. You may need to
look at ESX host log file to get more specific info about the failure.
If VMware session has been idle for some time, you may encounter some
Hi,
I've drawn up a Review Board Request for 4.3 and assigned it to myself.
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13865/
Here is the JIRA ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4527
Here is the gist:
This patch is part two of the SolidFire plug-in. Part one is described
in Review
Hi Animesh,
Can you please cherry-pick the following two commits from 4.2-forward?
commit 21cb33a02ce2ff1e1b22af275068451a3ab6add5
Author: Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com
Date: Tue Aug 27 14:11:55 2013 -0700
CLOUDSTACK-4516:[Upgrade][VMWare]
MySQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13865/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 3:17 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs:
Hi Kelven,
I would be happy to check on that.
I don't have much experience looking at ESXi logs, however. Are you
thinking I should be looking at logs on the ESXi box or CS logs (or
probably both)? If ESXi logs, would you be able to tell me where I go for
those?
Also, this works fine on one of
Done
From: Min Chen
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 2:17 PM
To: Animesh Chaturvedi
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS42] Please cherry-pick for CLOUDSTACK-4520 and CLOUDSTACK-4516
Hi Animesh,
Can you please cherry-pick the following two commits from
4.2-forward?
commit
Is there a patch, or is this to document work on a forthcoming patch?
I'd just be interested in looking at the KVM Storage Adaptor.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi,
I've drawn up a Review Board Request for 4.3 and assigned it to myself.
Just a document to work on a patch. :)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Is there a patch, or is this to document work on a forthcoming patch?
I'd just be interested in looking at the KVM Storage Adaptor.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Mike
By the way, I just have a single XenServer 6.1 host in this env.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi,
I've tried twice to create a new 4.2 environment (clean DB, starting over
from scratch), but both times I received the following
Community help is needed to fix up the release notes, any volunteers
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 1:01 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Volunteers to
It seems like on startup of the management server DatabaseUpgradeChecker
runs and upgrades the database performing DDL and DML. Is there a way
to upgrade the database that doesn't include starting the management server?
Darren
Sounds related to bug 21cb33a02ce2ff1e1b22af275068451a3ab6add5
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 4:01 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Can't bring up a new 4.2 environment
Hi,
I've tried twice
Can you pull in latest, I had already cherry picked Min's fix CLOUDSTACK-4516
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 4:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can't bring up a new 4.2 environment
By the
I've been working around some issues, but no luck. Primarily the storage
refactor seems to have bypassed the simulator functionally. Anybody got this to
work in 4.2? Otherwise I'm going back to 4.1 (!)
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
