---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15175/#review28513
---
4.2: b18e730108e6a24e00c372e3c56c655ff51106ba
- Girish Shilamkar
On Nov 7, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Rayees Namathponnan
rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
I don't think so we are running automation 4.2.1 branch in
jenkins.buildacloud.org, below result is from master branch;
So how did you come up with the results for the 4.2.1 branch ?
Finally got a new environment to build from source code (4.2 branch).
Unfortunately, it still crashes Cloudmonkey. The error messages are exactly
the same. Here's the new Cloudmonkey log:
2013-11-08 16:15:34,242 - requester.py:45 - [DEBUG] START Request
2013-11-08 16:15:34,242 -
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15344/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Darren Shepherd.
Bugs:
On Nov. 7, 2013, 7:38 p.m., Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
this does not seem to apply. Can you please pull the latest and see what's
going on
thanks
Travis Graham wrote:
Do you want this based against master or 4.2? The patch was originally
created against 4.2.
I tried both
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13922/#review28518
---
Ship it!
The feature was merged and changes committed to master in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13745/#review28517
---
Marty, it looks like this was lost somehow when we moved to the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13922/#review28519
---
Ship it!
The feature was merged and changes committed to master in
On Oct 27, 2013, at 7:02 AM, Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any update on this?
My commit
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/f5e7f46dadda741f10e5b674d0578ade9ba719d7
made
it into the 4.2.0 docs but
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14648/#review28520
---
4.2: fba874120bb40ddeceacbc7ef51217f34d3749de
- Girish Shilamkar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14595/#review28521
---
4.2: 6e1821f585df5c643873ab0ce1e7d91d1d94f00d
- Girish Shilamkar
On Nov 8, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Ryan Lei ryan...@cht.com.tw wrote:
Super. The Cloudmonkey crash is fixed now. Thanks a a lot, Sebastien!!
You are right about this line:
- response.setResponseName(DeployVMCmd.getResultObjectName());
+ response.setResponseName(getCommandName());
Please also
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14869/#review28524
---
4.2: 87983e09e21c51dbef6b2a8a0252b039e32915ad
- Girish Shilamkar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15208/#review28527
---
4.2: c76da53123f4130ac59bdf112171bc2e39af91d4
- Girish Shilamkar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15341/#review28528
---
Santhosh,
Please update the diff instead of uploading them as
H Sheng,
All sdn implementations use the field in one way or another as uri. So
if this is wrong reverting my patch won't do the trick, I am afraid. I
actually think the field should be renamed to broadcastUri, as this is
how it is used at the moment by a lot of elements.
Going back to only
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15341/
---
(Updated Nov. 8, 2013, 10:43 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and
On Nov. 8, 2013, 9:15 a.m., Girish Shilamkar wrote:
4.2: fba874120bb40ddeceacbc7ef51217f34d3749de
Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
if these patches apply to master, can you make sure to also apply to
master at the same time. thanks
They were already applied to master but missing in 4.2
Sudha, give us till the end of next week please. I'll report back on friday, ok?
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti
sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
Looks like Schuberg Philis is covering 4. 1.1 - 4.2.1 upgrade
We ( Citrix systems) would cover 4.2 - 4.2.1
I think these
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15341/#review28531
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On Nov. 8, 2013, 10:43
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15341/#review28532
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri
On Nov. 8, 2013,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14976/#review28533
---
Ship it!
commit 0076307863e9155273d9e4c14282de429388c9e9
Author:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15263/#review28534
---
commit cf7532e8480385bcc9c5dfd63fb82cd836282028
- SrikanteswaraRao
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15307/#review28535
---
9495fbc87317cbcf8b77630d06e52d52dfc19060
- SrikanteswaraRao
Dear all,
On CloudStack GUI, under Infrastructure Secondary Storage, I remember we
used to have a proper name for each secondary storage. However, after the
upgrade to CloudStack 4.2.0, the name disappears and it now becomes the ID
like this:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15348/
---
(Updated Nov. 8, 2013, 12:02 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kishan
I am working on upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1
some issues have been fixed , except CLOUDSTACK-5076
will fix it today
2013/11/8 Sudha Ponnaganti sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com
Hi,
Looks like Schuberg Philis is covering 4. 1.1 - 4.2.1 upgrade
We ( Citrix systems) would cover 4.2 - 4.2.1
I
Abhinandan (RM for 4.2.1),
You cannot cut RC at least till end of next week i.e Nov 15th.
Thanks
/sudha
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 3:08 AM
To: dev
Cc: int-tool...@schubergphilis.com; cloud-team
Subject: Re:
Thanks Wei for covering this path
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 4:04 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS 421] Upgrade testing
I am working on upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1 some issues have been fixed ,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15348/#review28538
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 8, 2013, 12:02 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15350/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
This is what I see when logged in:
http://i.imgur.com/RZvXuy1.png
Am I missing something?
Thanks!
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
I can see it fine, were you logged in at that time
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski
Sudha,
We can still cut RC but will wait for GA till Daan and others have done
their testing.
On 08/11/13 5:36 pm, Sudha Ponnaganti sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com
wrote:
Abhinandan (RM for 4.2.1),
You cannot cut RC at least till end of next week i.e Nov 15th.
Thanks
/sudha
-Original
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15350/#review28539
---
Commit 9e6a1eaffe3df0981703dc26ab4cc7043d4ca23f in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15350/#review28540
---
Commit a2117d46f90ae6a96e3d046e306e524756609f5d in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14058/
---
(Updated Nov. 8, 2013, 1:48 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
All,
Is it possible to use a Juniper SRX Firewall for firewall features, and a VR
for Load Balancing, or do you need to use an F5 to get 'in line' mode
If you can use a SRX, what IP gets load balanced, public or private etc
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect
[Description: Mail
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15351/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippaers.
Repository: cloudstack-git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15303/#review28542
---
Ship it!
commit 97348217c47ad1cb4e242a04ddfcc3696c2a280f
- Kishan
4.2.1 automation not executed from jenkins.buildacloud.org,
Automation executed in side my company including vmware,
Regards,
Rayees
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 12:20 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15344/#review28545
---
I don't agree with this approach. Following this logic for every
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14605/#review28546
---
Ship it!
Laszlo can you commit this?
- Darren Shepherd
On Oct.
Sheng, Min,
The use of the word semantics has triggered a line of though I want to
share on this.
The word vlanid is being used as a homonym in cloudstack, meaning both
vlan-number and broadcast-uri-pertaining-to-a-vlan. This has been so
since 4.0 and maybe even longer.
As I see it;
Assuming a
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:58:17AM +0700, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote:
2013/11/7 Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
While I appreciate the confidence, there are weekly calls to attend.
The particularly interesting one (MANO WG) happens on Wednesdays at 6am
PST.
I've tried but there's
So I take the silence to simply be a collective oops. I guess this
just should serve as a reminder to not break API compatibility without
a discussion. Perhaps our tests will surface this better in the future
(although I need to look, I wonder if any ACL tests were also simply
changed to
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 12:52:13PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
Sudha,
We can still cut RC but will wait for GA till Daan and others have done
their testing.
Abhi,
An RC here is really a release artifact that's being voted on, so
no... please don't do that until you are satisfied that
Daan,
I am curious about this: you mentioned that your patch has been running
fine on a mixed xen/vmware cloud environment. How come you didn't
encounter the blocker bug filed by Rayees on our automation environment on
master branch: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5046.
Hi Geoff,
Currently we don't support VR as load balancing alone, there are some VR
limitations need to be solved. I think the current plan is to fix it in
Felton.
--Sheng
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Geoff Higginbottom
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote:
All,
Is it possible to
Min,
I realize that you fixed something and didn't just change code because
of no reason. The point is that a vlan might be identified both as
number and as vlan://number. the patch is part of a series that
addresses these situations. I will look at this case and make sure
either only one is
Hi Daan,
Your commit has broken BOTH VMware and JuniperSRX, and these are only two
functional codes in your commit. The other two modification are comments.
So I don't know how your testing can possibly work.
Alena has already fixed the Juniper part at:
commit
Here is the part in your commit about SRX:
diff --git
a/plugins/network-elements/juniper-srx/src/com/cloud/network/resource/JuniperSrxResource.java
b/plugins/network-elements/juniper-srx/src/com/cloud/network/resource/JuniperSrxResource.java
index 3bcbf2d..46ef332 100644
---
Mike is this the only review that you cannot see, or it's a general problem you
are seeing with reviewboard. May be try another browser
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 4:47 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sorry, I meant the CloudStack major release after 4.3... Got mixed up a
little bit...
--Sheng
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Hi Geoff,
Currently we don't support VR as load balancing alone, there are some VR
limitations need to be solved. I think the
my code doesn't work when the vlan comes in as numeric. I don't claim
that. it only works when it comes in as vlan://number. It is then
and only then properly parsed into a numeric value.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Here is the part in your commit about
I will let Kishan comment but found this thread
http://markmail.org/thread/fxzki6ftqacyrylk
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 9:13 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: api incompatibility between 4.1 and
Kishan, weren't we supposed to create a default ACL container (list) and assign
the rule to it, if no ACL list is passed to the call? Shouldn't be hard to fix
From: Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.commailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
Reply-To:
Thats less than ideal, but better than no testing.
Did bugs get filed for the failing tests in 4.2.1?
--David
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Rayees Namathponnan
rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com wrote:
4.2.1 automation not executed from jenkins.buildacloud.org,
Automation executed in side my
Actually use this link to the message in that thread http://s.apache.org/QKI
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 11:24 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Kishan Kavala
Subject: RE: api incompatibility
Yes, that would certainly maintain api compatibility if one creates an
ACL without specifying aclid, it creates a new list and applies it to
the given network.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Actually use this link to the message in that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15362/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang.
Repository:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 31.10.2013 02:51, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
Hi All,
Want to check if anyone is testing upgrades from prior versions to
4.2.1. As Release date is getting close, If there are gaps, would like
to cover some scenarios in our lab.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13901/
---
(Updated Nov. 8, 2013, 10:17 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alena
I'd also like to highlight that it isn't a trivial problem.
Let's say there's 3 regions: this means there are 3 copies of the user
database that are geographically separated by network links that fail
quite often (orders of magnitude more than intra-DC networks).
Here we run into the consequences
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta.
Bugs: Cloudstack-5077.
Folks one final reminder I will cut the 4.3 branch tomorrow morning.
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 9:58 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS43] Schedule reminder : feature freeze this
Hi Animesh,
I get the same results using Firefox.
I assume there are supposed to be buttons to the left of the Review button?
If I make a new Review Request, I see more buttons.
Thanks
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Mike is this
Hi Wei,
I found this change in the MASTER.
commit 57ba367f3c985e80ea1b34267e298b481a353298
Author: Wei Zhou w.z...@leaseweb.com
Date: Thu Nov 7 11:09:06 2013 +0100
CLOUDSTACK-5042: change cloud.keystore to
cloudmanagementserver.keystore and install it (cherry picked from commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/#review28602
---
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade410to420.java
We are already (generally) AP for most infra changes really. I'd use that
model. Eventual consistency is better in this scenario.
On Nov 8, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
I'd also like to highlight that it isn't a trivial problem.
Let's say there's
69 matches
Mail list logo
