Thanks Animesh,
Great to see the first RC for 4.3.
I’ve been running some findbugs analysis on master and found several issues
that also seem to be present in the 4.3 branch. I’ve made two commit on master
that fixed some issues that i spotted (c2da2803476d55e814ec0d849482bd07c4f9f8f1
and
Hi,
I have a VM deployed in two isolated networks. I am doing following things
with each network.
1) Acquire public IP
2) Open firewall for this IP
3) Create port forwarding rule using this IP for the above mentioned VM
Now when I try to SSH to VM using these 2 IPs, SSH via IP belonging to
Hi Ashutosh,
1. Check the router public interface is configured with the acquired public ip
2. Check the rules specific to FW/PF are configured correctly on VR.
3. If 1,2 are correct try to debug the traffic by capturing the packets on
router and vm
4. If the packets reached to router and then
Thanks Jayapal, I will check and revert.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Ashutosh,
1. Check the router public interface is configured with the acquired
public ip
2. Check the rules specific to FW/PF are configured correctly on
Guys,
Florin raised a problem in creating GRE tunnel with ACS 4.2 release and
XenServer 6.2. I found the problem come from enableXenserverNetwork method.
CloudStack made a tricky to create network when plugging a VIF to dom0 and
then unplugging immediately. With XCP version I done in GSOC, I
Long values till at least 128 are cached, the ref being same, the ==
operator is guaranteed to work for values from -127 to 128.
It the value can go beyond that range then this is a potential mine.
-abhi
On 23/01/14 1:51 pm, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
Thanks Animesh,
Great to see
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17233/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5875
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 12:25 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Location of the 4.3 System VM Templates
The best location for the system vm images is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17231/#review32603
---
setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql
Hi,
We had multiple threads discussing the switch to Java 7 which all ended
in +1 everywhere.
The most recent [0] one is from the beginning of this month and since
nobody actually took the step I'll do it.
On 27-01-2014 11:00:00 CET / GMT +1 I'll push a commit where on the
pom.xml
Are 32-bit templates not supported for 4.3 ?
-Original Message-
From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 12:25 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Location of the 4.3 System VM Templates
The best location for the system vm images is
KVM =
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-maste
r-kvm.qcow2.bz2 (85a1bed07bf43cbf022451cb2ecae4ff)
Xenserver =
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-maste
r-xen.vhd.bz2 (3e29b40377272803eebccfe40efea199)
VMWare =
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17233/#review32604
---
Commit d31fa09c7e5bb04fcc4594c0352d9b91171e9d1a in branch
Hi,
Just want to add a few of my observations to what Tuna said.
a. I managed to have GRE isolation working with CloudStack 4.1.1 and a
quick patch to bypass enableXenserverNetwork method.
b. I tried GRE isolation with CloudStack 4.2.1 with the same quick patch
for bypassing
Simulator issue is fixed. It now works, please check.
Santhosh
From: sebgoa [run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 5:50 AM
To: Santhosh Edukulla
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; gir...@clogeny.com; Prasanna Santhanam
Subject: Re: [ACS 4.3] RC
Please see the thread
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cloudstack.apache.org/msg17396.html
On 23/01/14 5:10 PM, Florin Dumitrascu
florin.dumitra...@intunenetworks.com wrote:
Hi,
Just want to add a few of my observations to what Tuna said.
a. I managed to have GRE isolation working
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17233/#review32605
---
Commit f999a01837e60f0c51ef0eb4ad19c29e43ca3037 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17233/#review32606
---
Ship it!
4.3-forward - d31fa09c7e5bb04fcc4594c0352d9b91171e9d1a
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:39:30AM +, Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
Simulator issue is fixed. It now works, please check.
CLOUDSTACK-5875 probably needs to go to master as well. Didn't see a
commit there. Once it's fixed in master all jobs in [1]
will show success. These are run on a per-commit
Wow... I thought everything was done in XenServer before my submitted patch.
--Tuna
Sent from my GT-N7000
On Jan 23, 2014 6:49 PM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
Please see the thread
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cloudstack.apache.org/msg17396.html
On 23/01/14 5:10 PM,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17231/
---
(Updated Jan. 23, 2014, 12:07 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17231/
---
(Updated Jan. 23, 2014, 12:10 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17231/
---
(Updated Jan. 23, 2014, 12:09 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
Hi Murali, Tuna,
Thank you for this piece of information. All starts to make sense now.
I am wondering if there is a better way to communicate this issue to end users.
It would save others a couple of weeks struggling.
If GRE is not just a technology preview (meaning it has been explicitly
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17231/#review32615
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jayapal Reddy
On Jan. 23, 2014, 12:10 p.m.,
Thanks Abhi. I think that means that we need to consider this a mine and needs
fixing.
Unfortunately that means a -1 on the current RC, but i hope people will
continue testing this RC so we get some more feedback.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 23 jan. 2014, at 10:16, Abhinandan Prateek
The list of changes link indicates that the 4.3.0 release notes should
be here;
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs
I'm not seeing any 4.3.0 related docs there.
is there some update that has not propagated to the apache web site yet ...
/Ove
-
Apache CloudStack CHANGES
Sounds good. Thanks Wido!
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 10:49 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Switch to Java 7 in master branch on Monday Jan 27th
2014
Hi,
We had multiple
I'll respectfully disagree. We need to find a place for systemVMs
whether that means classifying them as convenience binaries or putting
them on Wido's box, or S3.
The problem with jenkins, and specifically with that link for jenkins
is that 4.3 is still a living branch; and like with 4.2.1 there
On 01/23/2014 03:35 PM, David Nalley wrote:
I'll respectfully disagree. We need to find a place for systemVMs
whether that means classifying them as convenience binaries or putting
them on Wido's box, or S3.
I manually sync the images now. Sometimes I download some images to this
location:
+1
I could successfully deploy an advanced zone with XenServer 6.2 - did some
basic testing around snapshots, templates and VPC.
Thanks,
~Talluri
On 23/01/14 7:06 pm, Ove Ewerlid ove.ewer...@oracle.com wrote:
The list of changes link indicates that the 4.3.0 release notes should
be here;
+1
Cheers,
Hugo
On 23 jan. 2014, at 14:02, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Sounds good. Thanks Wido!
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 10:49 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject:
On Jan. 17, 2014, 6:06 a.m., Murali Reddy wrote:
changes look good, patch does not apply on master. Can you please resubmit.
Also please see if the patch applies on 4.2, when you resubmit.
Murali,
Added patch for master - it does not apply on 4.2. Code change enough that it
won't
+1.
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Switch to Java 7 in master branch on Monday Jan 27th 2014
Hi,
We had multiple threads discussing the switch to Java 7
Hi,
There was a thread on the users mailing list around the DB connection
timeouts when the underlaying MySQL active/passive cluster changes
master. The solution so far is to use a crontab to monitor if the server
is crashed.
I'm not too familiar with the tomcat or cloudstack configs, but
Animesh, I can see the commit id that you mention for this release,
but it is a revert of a functional commit commented on as
'CLOUDSTACK-5923: CS doesn't do master switch for XS any more, CS will
depend on XS HA to do master switch, XS HA needs to be enabled.'
Did you forget to push the
Quick question...
In the 4.3.0 vote thread, I saw this ticket:
CLOUDSTACK-5923
OK fine, but what happens if we are running 4.2.1 with a cluster today? Should
we enable HA today or only when we upgrade to 4.3?
Thanks!
--
Francois Gaudreault
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15247/#review32625
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Toshiaki Hatano
On Jan. 22, 2014, 5:44
It failed in invoking addVmwareDC, where we will invoke vmware API to get
CustomeField. Using java generics, class reflection failed in finding that
declared method, thus throwing NoSuchMethodFound exception.
Thanks
-min
On 1/22/14 10:52 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
Sorry about
On Jan. 23, 2014, 5:08 p.m., Toshiaki Hatano wrote:
Ship It!
applied to master and 4.3.
commit c9b8bc0884e9e1166046bfdd1354a991d39d7d71 in master
commit 002c2b22f43f7ace0ade652e92c2d46b92c3136f in 4.3
- Toshiaki
---
This is an
Since there's already another -1, I'll add something else that needs
to be fixed but I wouldn't necessarily let become a blocker.
debian/changelog needs an entry indicating the version as a release
rather than snapshot.
This needs to be integrated into our release process though.
--David
On
I asked one of our IT guys to look into this. He determined a port was in
the wrong VLAN and that's how my VM got an IP address from a different DHCP
server.
No CloudStack issue here. :)
Thanks
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
That is an
Hi folks,
It's that time again - we are getting close to the end of the 4.3.0
cycle and we need to start identifying release managers for the next
patch and feature releases. Anyone want to step up and work on doing
this largely thankless task?
--David
Maybe before calling out another release manager, we better sit down and talk
about is there anything we can improve for the release process. Seems it's huge
mount of work to do as a release manager.
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Thursday, January
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 7:49 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (first round)
Animesh, I can see the commit id that you mention for this release, but it is a
revert of a functional
Release Notes are still pending and they are not pushed with the RC build
process, I am still waiting for a volunteer to take over the RN. I had called
out for help on Release Notes two weeks back.
I will create a JIRA filter for Known and Fixed issues today which can be put
into Release
Hugo
Thanks for running find bugs and finding the issues let's wait for some more
comments on the issues called out. Copying some folks for input. It's always
good to call out the issues but I wish we had run find bugs sooner.
Thanks
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Trippie
Hugo,
The root cause of the problem comes from this line of change, it is very
subtle, but it indeed causes the problem
Method getMorMethod = dpCls.getDeclaredMethod(methodName, (Class?)null);
There is a subtle difference between
Method getMorMethod = dpCls.getDeclaredMethod(methodName,
Folks while we may need another RC but do provide your feedback on this one
ASAP and don't wait for next RC. Respinning RC's is time consuming and can be
frustrating and aearlier feedback and fixes goes a long way in making releases
efficient.
Thanks
Animesh
On Jan 23, 2014, at 11:52 AM,
blasted vlans and the trunks they rhode in on! :) glad all is well.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I asked one of our IT guys to look into this. He determined a port was in
the wrong VLAN and that's how my VM got an IP address from a
I think the issue Hugo fixed should trigger another RC. But still, we need
to test as much as we can for current RC now. It would make the release
work easier.
--Sheng
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Hugo
Thanks for running find
Guys, if anyone knows the workaround for the problem, please share in the
thread. I¹m pretty much blocked on master branch by this issue.
=Alena.
On 1/22/14, 6:03 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
I am seeing this as well.
On 22/01/14 4:43 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
To be exact, line
Method getMorMethod = dpCls.getDeclaredMethod(methodName,
(Class?)null);
will be translated by compiler as
Method getMorMethod = dpCls.getDeclaredMethod(methodName, new Class[] {
null } );
line
Method getMorMethod =
That change was reverted and is not in 4.3.0 so the behavior will be the same
as 4.2.1
-Original Message-
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 7:57 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: XS master handling in 4.3.0
Quick
The patch will be in next release, XS HA can be enabled only after upgrading to
the CS release including this patch.
We will provide document in the next CS release.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23,
Hello,
Is anyone else experiencing a delay when traveling to their admin page?
Seems as though mine takes 45 seconds roughly to render.
Prior installs rendered much faster.
- Maurice
Hi Alena,
I just moved some commits back (to commit 8612413) and its working fine at
the moment with no db changes required. So probably to unblock yourself
you can try doing that.
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 23/01/14 2:48 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
wrote:
Guys, if anyone knows
If you know the offending commit revert it for now. It's broken for a day.
Thanks
Animesh
On Jan 23, 2014, at 5:12 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Alena,
I just moved some commits back (to commit 8612413) and its working fine at
the moment with no db changes required. So
Are you talking about when you first visit http://name-or-IP:8080/client ??
If so as Marcus has previously pointed out its the css and images
loading, which is used throughout the UI. And it's a number of
megabytes. There was a proposal to gzip that up but not sure what
happened with it.
--David
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
If you know the offending commit revert it for now. It's broken for a day.
Agreed - revert and lets move on.
--David
David,
Thank you, that's exactly, what I am referring to. I have noticed each
time I go in the latency is present, I suspect one will just need to
deal with it until perhaps a future update?
- Maurice
On 1/23/14, 9:49 PM, David Nalley wrote:
Are you talking about when you first visit
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Maurice Lawler maur...@daoenix.com wrote:
David,
Thank you, that's exactly, what I am referring to. I have noticed each time
I go in the latency is present, I suspect one will just need to deal with it
until perhaps a future update?
- Maurice
I seem to
Hugo can you put needed commits in 4.3-forward and I will rebuild the RC.
Thanks
Animesh
On Jan 23, 2014, at 5:33 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
Thanks Abhi. I think that means that we need to consider this a mine and
needs fixing.
Unfortunately that means a -1 on the
Hello,
I am setting up KVM / Cloudstack all under one server. I have done this
countless of other times, however, this time on a new server I have
noticed it did not provision cloudbr0 / cloud0 as it has done in the past.
I saw a few tutorials where it says to setup VLANS ifcfg-eth0.100-300
+1, I will update the system vm template scripts to pick up jre 1.7.
-abhi
On 23/01/14 8:56 pm, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote:
+1.
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:19 PM
To:
I've always setup cloudbr0 (pub/mgt/guest br) per the documented examples,
and never cloud0 (link local bridge). You can look at the devcloud-kvm doc
for an example of an all-in-one. The traffic labels reference bridges, so
you have to have a bridge to enter as a traffic label in the first place.
Abhi,
If we switch to jre1.7 for systemvm, we need to generate new systemvm for all
the Hypervisors.
Will this be for 4.4 and forward only right? It won't be in 4.3.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday,
+users
On 24-Jan-2014, at 2:38 AM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
blasted vlans and the trunks they rhode in on! :) glad all is well.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I asked one of our IT guys to look into this. He
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14124/#review32472
---
Can you please run marvin test cases of VPC with this patch and
On 23/01/14 5:48 PM, Florin Dumitrascu
florin.dumitra...@intunenetworks.com wrote:
Hi Murali, Tuna,
Thank you for this piece of information. All starts to make sense now.
I am wondering if there is a better way to communicate this issue to end
users. It would save others a couple of weeks
On 24/01/14 10:33 am, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote:
Abhi,
If we switch to jre1.7 for systemvm, we need to generate new systemvm for
all the Hypervisors.
Will this be for 4.4 and forward only right? It won't be in 4.3.
Changes will go in master and not in 4.3.
Yes, my fixes will be put to 4.3 tomorrow! I get the flu today. Back to
work tomorrow.
--Tuna
Sent from my GT-N7000
On Jan 24, 2014 12:43 PM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
On 23/01/14 5:48 PM, Florin Dumitrascu
florin.dumitra...@intunenetworks.com wrote:
Hi Murali, Tuna,
Thanks Abhi for the info.
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 11:18 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Switch to Java 7 in master branch on Monday Jan 27th
2014
On 24/01/14 10:33 am,
Please apply this patch to 4.3 branch as well.
-Original Message-
From: Toshiaki Hatano [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Toshiaki
Hatano
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 10:53 PM
To: Marcus Sorensen; Toshiaki Hatano
Cc: Yoshikazu Nojima; cloudstack
Subject: Re: Review
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17120/#review32702
---
I see many files unrelated to this fix have been updated and
Folks
I have updated the Release Notes in 4.3 with a link to Known Issues and Fixed
Issues in 4.3 release and kicked off the build. We need a volunteer to fix up
the release notes.
Here are the JIRA filters if someone is interested to look at them
Issues fixed in 4.3
On Jan. 24, 2014, 6:52 a.m., Prachi Damle wrote:
I see many files unrelated to this fix have been updated and present in the
patch.
Please can you update the patch with changes needed for the fix only?
Following are some such files.
api/src/com/cloud/user/AccountService.java
Hi,
I have picked up the Overview section.
Thanks
-Radhika
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 12:58 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS 4.3] Release Notes
Folks
I have updated the Release Notes
78 matches
Mail list logo
