I prefer the focus on support that comes with David's suggestion. Targeting
the latest stable release for a new platform greatly reduces the number of
permutations to test.
Pursuing legacy systems limits the flexibility of ACS to evolve. For instance,
we'll probably be on Java 7 in the next
On 02/20/2014 05:01 PM, Frankie Onuonga wrote:
Hi guys,
I got this in my mail box from last year.
I honestly do not know how I missed this.
Isn't this a little odd as I have been able to mail you guys successfully.
I've been getting the same. I started ignoring them since my e-mail
works
On 21.02.2014 06:01, Marcus wrote:
If someone gets around to it they can add in root resize support via
the patch I've posted to the list once or twice. I can maybe look at
updating it for master and testing if I can find some time. It's a
very short patch, but the testing is what I don't have
On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
wrote:
I find a little ironic that the internal policies are a lot more restrictive
than the Apache license itself :S
Meanwhile, isn't CloudStack falling into the MySQL FOSS exception?
Hi Murali,
Thanks for clarifying this.
However, I would not consider bug CLOUDSTACK-5967 fixed until UI support is
restored for this basic functionality.
It is a hack. We cannot expect an end user to go into that level of detail.
Will look at how much effort is involved to add UI support.
From
There is a bug filed for live migration on ESXi 5.5.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6146
I feel we need to fix this bug too in 4.3.
Thanks,
~Talluri
On 20/02/14 11:19 pm, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:trip...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 21 February 2014 1:15 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Hugo Trippaers; Ian Southam
Subject: Re: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130
Sent from my iPhone
On 20 feb. 2014, at
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18352/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Koushik Das and Prachi Damle.
Bugs:
For DB HA we have included a new class StaticStrategy.java which is having
compile time dependency on mysql -connector-java.
I will make change in pom, as provided scope dependency instead of compile time
so that maven will not include in the bundle while packaging.
Thanks Regards
Damodar/
FOSS seems to apply to us but the question is whether Apache recognises that.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Francois Gaudreault fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
wrote:
I find a little ironic that the internal policies are
Animesh,
Having followed the legal discussions and remarks from David on these
matters, I will have to retract my +1 and cast a -1 (binding). I
suggest we postpone 4.3 indefinitely awaiting legal advice and
discussion on how to proceed on this list.
sorry,
Daan
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:16 PM,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/#review35142
---
Commit c03fd70ed22d4b0b2ea41fdb923f4432664219d1 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/#review35143
---
Ship it!
Committed to master and 4.3-forward
- Girish Shilamkar
Daan,
It seems that the dependency on the connector can be changed so that the
connector is not packaged with the product.
Once Damodar, who is fixing it provides a patch we can take a call.
-abhi
On 21/02/14 5:31 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Animesh,
Having followed
sure,
we will need to do something in install instructions as well, do we?
thanks,
Daan
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com wrote:
Daan,
It seems that the dependency on the connector can be changed so that the
connector is not packaged with
What I get is that by fixing the pom.xml, maven will not package the
connector.
The dependency for the connector was set to compile time that made the
maven to download the connector at compile time instead of at run-time.
Due to this the connector got packaged.
Now changing it to provided will
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18353/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Chip Childers, and David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18353/
---
(Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 12:51 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip
I have created a defect for this at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6152
I have put the patch in review board at : https://reviews.apache.org/r/18353/
Please review the same and commit it to the branch(4.3-forward) if these
changes are fine. Otherwise please let me know if we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18353/
---
(Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 1:15 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip
Heya,
Just pushed commit ac00ab0087ca8f59184121697f7ac4343a694093
Author: Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:54:38 2014 +0100
Cleanup all mysql dependencies and set all to provided.
This will set all mysql dependencies to provided and clean them up in the
Forgot to mention that this is pushed to master so we can test it before we
drag it to 4.3
Cheers,
Hugo
On 21 feb. 2014, at 14:56, Hugo Trippaers trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Heya,
Just pushed commit ac00ab0087ca8f59184121697f7ac4343a694093
Author: Hugo Trippaers
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18353/#review35145
---
Hey,
I think the main problem here is that there are references in
Packages already depend on the mysql connector, so no changes there.
We do need to configure tomcat to include the os provided mysql-connector into
the class path of the application.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 21 feb. 2014, at 14:57, Hugo Trippaers trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Forgot to mention that
Initially I thought my change caused to bundle the mysql-connector-java into
RPM in 4.3... but after did more analysis I found that mysql-connector is
already getting bundled into RPM in 4.2.x as well.
Looks like issue is something else as well.. I am not sure this will fix the
actual issue.
Damodar,
Did you see my review comments?
Cheers,
Hugo
On 21 feb. 2014, at 16:00, Damoder Reddy damoder.re...@citrix.com wrote:
Initially I thought my change caused to bundle the mysql-connector-java into
RPM in 4.3... but after did more analysis I found that mysql-connector is
already
On Feb. 21, 2014, 2:01 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Note that this change does not actually make a difference unless all other
poms that have mysql as a requirement are modified.
Yes I realized this after changes are done to my original changes related to DB
HA. I realized that it is
GitHub user NuxRo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/3
Update rnotes.rst
corrected small typos regarding version numbers
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
So, just curious here, but why wouldn't the ESX(i) host simply be able to
create an NFS datastore that points to the NFS share on the secondary
storage location directly?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.comwrote:
For XS that¹s not required as its pushed into XS
Actually I am pretty sure that is what it doesSo I changed like 4-5 things
my mistake, then I noticed a datastore with a GUID looking name popped up
on my hosts. This datastore was mapped to my NFS share. Once that showed up CS
started creating the system VMs. So I am trying to back track
Regards,
Sateesh
-Original Message-
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
Sent: 17 February 2014 10:18
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Granular Controller Support in CloudStack over VMware
deployments
Hi,
I would like to add
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: 17 February 2014 11:13
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Anthony Xu
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Granular Controller Support in CloudStack over VMware
deployments
Sateesh,
I think if you want to do this then
-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 February 2014 12:55
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Granular Controller Support in CloudStack over VMware
deployments
I don't think this should be tied to the template, but rather the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18358/
---
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Hugo Trippaers.
Repository:
Damoder: your patch merely piled on to an existing problem. I'll
respond more to this in a bit, but I think your approach solves your
bit of the problem. I have a much longer email that talks about why
coming up.
Thanks for working on getting a patch up so rapidly.
--David
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. To do so, please top-post your response.
If your project does not have this
Success!!
So what I had to do was to mount /mnt/sec on the mgmt server to the secondary
NFS storageOnce I did that all the secondary vm's were created and the mgmt
server created the GUID named datastore on the hypervisors back to the NFS
share...
Funny that this was not documented anywhere
Thanks for the clarification.
I was pretty confident an ESX host creates an NFS datastore (with a UUID
for a name) that maps to the NFS share. This is similar to how a XenServer
host creates an NFS storage repository that maps to the NFS share.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Michael Phillips
Thanks for this detailed explanation, Hugo! That was really useful info.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
OK, the systemvm status is making more sense now.
For everybody just as confused as me by the current discussion let me try
to summarize.
I've been a little behind on e-mail and just reading up on this legal issue
in more detail now.
I agree we should be -1 on 4.3 until we have a good resolution for it.
Thanks
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
Animesh,
Having followed the legal
Definitely not sure why the mgmt server does not create /mnt/sec for you and
auto mount it
Dev guys, is it possible to get this feature added in a future build? Also what
would it take to document this is the current doumentation?
If you have multiple secondary storages, my guess is that you
Hi Joris,
This patch hasn't been applied yet, sorry for my second thought.
Could you comment on it?
--Sheng
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18310/
On February
Any idea why the default centos5.3 template would be stuck downloading at
88%??
The secondary storage where it is getting downloaded to has 44GB of free space.
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:34:18 -0700
Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Hi guys,
Some people (Florin and Benoit) complain about the GRE tunnel issue on
XenServer 6.2. Actually it has not been fixed completely, although Murali
submitted a patch to bypass without any exception. Personally I stuck in
how can we make XenServer 6.2 HOSTs recognize the GRE network created
Miguel, here is my patch that for me fixed the dependency problems. Other
than that, it looks good.
Thank you,
Laszlo
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Laszlo Hornyak laszlo.horn...@gmail.comwrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
Have you tried manually downloading it (outside of CloudStack) to see if
that works?
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Michael Phillips
mphilli7...@hotmail.comwrote:
Any idea why the default centos5.3 template would be stuck downloading
at 88%??
The secondary storage where it is getting
How would you go about manually downloading it?
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:05:20 -0700
Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Have you tried manually downloading it (outside of CloudStack) to see if
that works?
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014
If you look in the vm_template table in the cloud DB, you should be able to
find a URL for that template.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Michael Phillips
mphilli7...@hotmail.comwrote:
How would you go about manually downloading it?
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:05:20 -0700
Subject: Re:
Gotcha, thought about trying to upload my own template or iso to see how that
worked..
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:16:15 -0700
Subject: Re: VMware and NFS
From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
If you look in the vm_template table in the cloud DB, you should be
I use a mix of both of those approaches. Sometimes I use the built-in ones;
sometimes I upload my own.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Michael Phillips
mphilli7...@hotmail.comwrote:
Gotcha, thought about trying to upload my own template or iso to see how
that worked..
Date: Fri, 21 Feb
Please don't email me this stuff anynmore remove me from your listing
Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:21:27
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgdev@cloudstack.apache.org
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/335/changes
Changes:
[Alena Prokharchyk] Display flag support for LB/InternalLB/NetworkACL rules
--
[...truncated 1303 lines...]
[INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/ws/server
Chantel - If you're looking to unsubscribe from this mailing this, please
send a message here:
dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:22 PM,
chantel_piore...@mobileemail.vodafonesa.co.za wrote:
Please don't email me this stuff anynmore remove me from your listing
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/336/changes
OK - so hoping to inject some clarification to this discussion - maybe
it will make more sense.
Lets start with definitions, and I'll try and use caps when referring
to this definitions.
LEGAL - when I talk about legal problems below I refer to liability
incurred by individuals in the project,
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 3:23 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?
OK - so hoping to inject some clarification to this discussion - maybe it will
make more sense.
Lets start
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16867/
---
(Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 11:52 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
LEGAL - when I talk about legal problems below I refer to liability incurred
by
individuals in the project, especially the release manager,
[Animesh] Can you clarify 'especially the release manager' part? Release
manager is just like any other volunteer and does not have any special
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 4:13 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?
LEGAL - when I talk about legal problems below I refer to liability
incurred by individuals in the project,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18392/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6156
Formally canceling this VOTE because of mysql-connector license dependency.
Thanks
Animesh
On Feb 18, 2014, at 8:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.commailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
61 matches
Mail list logo
