---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18970/#review37165
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri
On March 10, 2014,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18970/#review37166
---
Commit 286974488eab03efddfea35962161a224e997ab0 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18970/#review37168
---
Commit 768e91ef4560b15deb4804e3593b3ad22fa18eef in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18971/#review37169
---
test/integration/smoke/test_secondary_storage.py
I tried to reproduce the issue the way you mentioned with few changes. I
don't have iSCSI SAN on my setup. I connected a 2 GB disk that I presented
as storage tagged NFS primary to CS. I created a 1GB disk offering and then
deployed a VM on this new primary. Took a couple of snapshots like you
I see this on KVM as well. I don't recall hearing about the GPU
feature, sounds interesting.
014-03-14 01:14:06,302 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(StatsCollector-1:ctx-b3b2e81f) Details from executing class
com.cloud.agent.api.GetGPUStatsCommand: Unsupported command
oh yes, I do remember this. We probably need to fix the null pointer,
but I think it's more or less just noise.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I see this on KVM as well. I don't recall hearing about the GPU
feature, sounds interesting.
014-03-14
Hi Min,
Which version of XS you are working on?
--Sanjay
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 6:18 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Anybody saw this error on master?
Hi there,
Anybody has seen this error on master? It is
I have no idea if its related to this branch merge or not, but I'm
unable to start the ssvm on master since I pulled about an hour ago. I
can deploy a fresh zone, and the ssvm will actually start, but it
can't transition state in the DB, so it kills the vm.
2014-03-14 01:57:46,356 DEBUG
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-slowbuild/426/changes
Changes:
[koushik] CLOUDSTACK-6052: List VM enhancement to support querying with
multiple VM IDs
[talluri] CLOUDSTACK-6215: Updating test case to accomodate condition for VMware
I have resolved this issue under this ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6238
--Sanjay
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 1:09 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Sanjay Tripathi
Subject: Re: Anybody saw this
creating a new router does the same...
2014-03-14 02:06:41,446 DEBUG [vm.dao.VMInstanceDaoImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-5:Job-41/Job-42 ctx-91928df8) Unable to update
VM[DomainRouter|r-5-VM]: DB Data={Host=1; State=Running; updated=3;
time=Fri Mar 14 02:06:11 MDT 2014} New Data: {Host=1;
I think it's a very difficult subject, because we're relying on the developers
to write tests which will show whether the code in their feature is good, and
think of every possible failure mode in order to ratify their code.
Obviously if they can think of the failure, they'll probably have
Will these automatically go into 4.3.1, do we know if they've gone into master
as well?
Otherwise does this mean we have a load of bug fixes which we're not putting
into 4.3.0 which could potentially become orphaned in the 4.3-forward branch?
(this query may be just my ignorance regarding ACS
Sorry, I see what the problem is. I've been looking for other possible side
effects. But this should only affect anything in ApiDispatcher after
standardDispatchChain.dispatch(new DispatchTask(cmd, params));
because the params used are not the same object processed in the
dispatchChain. I'm going
On March 11, 2014, 12:28 p.m., Donal Lafferty wrote:
1. How do you guarantee that 'sudo' is never added to scripts created by
the Script class? See (utils/src/com/cloud/utils/script/Script.java)
2. How do you version control the .exe?
3. WiX can be run on Linux in a WINE
Paul, they might be disapproved patches as well.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Will these automatically go into 4.3.1, do we know if they've gone into
master as well?
Otherwise does this mean we have a load of bug fixes which we're not putting
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/
---
(Updated March 14, 2014, 9:16 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
Our problem is in the test coverage of the existing code base not in
new features! As \Paul said dev will code tests they can think of.
It's the ones they didn't think of that will break stuff. But we don't
mind if new features aren't fully functional. We mind regression the
most. You can not
On March 11, 2014, 12:28 p.m., Donal Lafferty wrote:
1. How do you guarantee that 'sudo' is never added to scripts created by
the Script class? See (utils/src/com/cloud/utils/script/Script.java)
2. How do you version control the .exe?
3. WiX can be run on Linux in a WINE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/#review37185
---
The exe which was a major issue for this patch has been removed.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/
---
(Updated March 14, 2014, 9:42 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
On 11.03.2014 15:28, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Hey guys,
I didn’t go and tally all the +1s and -1s for the shift of the
feature freeze, but with so many reactions i feel sticking to the
schedule is the only way to go. We should only change dates if there
is a consensus and there clearly is none at
The params are converted to lowercase, the problem is the processed params
are available only inside the dispatch chain, so later when the rest of the
method ApiDispatcher#dispatch tries to get the param, in the map where it
was looking up it was still with Camel Case name. I think the proper way
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19038/#review37187
---
Commit f7337527cf9dbb35ec4c60621d4b37173635660c in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/#review37186
---
Can you add some doc or ref to doc that explains how to test this
I'll merge these changes later today.
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:32 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [Merge] Storage motion for hyper-v
Hi,
I would like to merge storage
If you have an account on the wiki, I can add some rights to it (or
any pmc member could)
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Antonio Fornié Casarrubios
antonio.for...@gmail.com wrote:
The params are converted to lowercase, the problem is the processed params
are available only inside the
I do have for Antonio Fornie antonio.for...@gmail.com
2014-03-14 11:02 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com:
If you have an account on the wiki, I can add some rights to it (or
any pmc member could)
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Antonio Fornié Casarrubios
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Antonio Fornié Casarrubios
antonio.for...@gmail.com wrote:
antonio.fornie
is in
--
Daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19038/#review37188
---
Ship it!
master - f7337527cf9dbb35ec4c60621d4b37173635660c,
Guys `n' dolls,
One if the new tools for maintaining our quality is the new job
slowbuild. It does a build and then runs findbugs (and other tools)
against our code base. Since a while this has been going on and it
succeeds if no new warnings where introduced since last successful
build. For a
I will be merging my branch changes later today.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:42 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Merge] CLOUDSTACK-6106 vpc support on Hyper-V
Fixed all
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-slowbuild/427/changes
Changes:
[sanjay.tripathi] CLOUDSTACK-6238: NPE in HostStatsCollector.
[koushik] CLOUDSTACK-6090: Virtual Router Service Failure Alerting
--
[...truncated 18054 lines...]
Tests
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19036/
---
(Updated March 14, 2014, 11:21 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19036/#review37190
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sateesh Chodapuneedi
On March 14, 2014,
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/2469/changes
Changes:
[Devdeep Singh] CLOUDSTACK-6143: Storage motion support for hyper-v. With these
changes a volume on a shared
[muralimmreddy] -introduces 'DistributedRouter' as capability to 'Connectivity'
service.
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/475/changes
Changes:
[muralimmreddy] -introduces 'DistributedRouter' as capability to 'Connectivity'
service.
[muralimmreddy] -add check to ensure 'Connectivity' service provider specified
in
[muralimmreddy] mark VPC to be using distributed
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/476/changes
On 13.03.2014 21:24, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
[Animesh] Did you see this with prior RC too?
[Animesh] Nux, security group support for advanced zone is limited
and that too was developed in 4.2. I don’t think any changes have been
made to that support since then. Can you call out what specific
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/
---
(Updated March 14, 2014, 12:10 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19036/
---
(Updated March 14, 2014, 12:10 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19036/
---
(Updated March 14, 2014, 12:10 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep
On March 14, 2014, 9:58 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java, line 881
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/diff/3/?file=519572#file519572line881
why is this condition needed if both the if and the else branch take
the same action.
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/2470/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/#review37191
---
Hi Daan
I have updated the FS in wiki regarding how to build and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/#review37192
---
Hi Daan
I have updated the FS in wiki regarding how to build and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19036/#review37193
---
Commit 48f8a95b06b0348ba1349cb5434183c2c18710db in cloudstack's
On 14.03.2014 12:06, Nux! wrote:
It looks like the traffic doesn't go in the right chains, all traffic
is accepted as FORWARD is set to ACCEPT.
There are zero packets going through BF-breth0-109.
Here's outputs from:
iptables-save: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/85337/47982321/raw/
hi guys,
i have resolved all issues with fixes and refactoring of plugin code, its
good to go now ,
i'll submit once i get the ship it message. thanks for the review.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:19 AM, punith s punit...@cloudbyte.com wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
I am seeing another issue on master.
Filed a bug for this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6239
Thanks,
~Talluri
On 14/03/14 3:50 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Antonio Fornié Casarrubios
antonio.for...@gmail.com wrote:
Will be doing it today, however it seems that there have been some new
issues that have cropped up in master that break basic functionality.
I'm not sure if anyone should merge or not while that is the case. I
was attempting to validate that the latest merges played well in my
branch, but I
Can the offending check-ins be reverted or master be blocked for further
check-ins till blocking issue is fixed.
Talluri is running BVTs and can that be taken as basic passing criteria to
re-enable check-ins.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday,
-1 given the regression in Security Groups for advanced zones.
I was able to duplicate NUX reported issues, e.g., works in ACS421 but
does not work at all in ACS43.
/Ove
On 03/13/2014 01:26 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up
It should be noted that my tests use a single IP per VM.
I believe NUX mentioned using multiple IP's.
When SG in advanced zone is enabled, only one NIC can be assigned per VM.
/Ove
On 03/14/2014 02:41 PM, Ove Ewerlid wrote:
On 03/14/2014 01:57 PM, Nux! wrote:
On 14.03.2014 12:06, Nux! wrote:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/1/
--
[...truncated 60 lines...]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Host Allocator Random
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Dedicated Resources
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervisor
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19036/#review37196
---
Commit 48f8a95b06b0348ba1349cb5434183c2c18710db in cloudstack's
Did you test on fresh 4.2.1, or upgraded platform?
2014-03-14 14:51 GMT+01:00 Ove Ewerlid ove.ewer...@oracle.com:
It should be noted that my tests use a single IP per VM.
I believe NUX mentioned using multiple IP's.
When SG in advanced zone is enabled, only one NIC can be assigned per VM.
Is this similar to CLOUDSTACK-5144?
2014-03-14 14:57 GMT+01:00 Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com:
Did you test on fresh 4.2.1, or upgraded platform?
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-slowbuild/428/changes
Changes:
[koushik] CLOUDSTACK-6090: Virtual Router Service Failure Alerting
[Devdeep Singh] CLOUDSTACK-6143: Storage motion support for hyper-v. With these
changes a volume on a shared
[muralimmreddy] -introduces
On 13.03.2014 18:58, Nux! wrote:
On 13.03.2014 00:26, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
-1
In Adv SG zone assigning secondary IPs to a NIC doesn't update the
ipset accordingly on the agent/hv; it requires
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/2/changes
On 14.03.2014 13:59, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Is this similar to CLOUDSTACK-5144?
Yes, but it's only exhibited on KVM.
My colleague who is testing 4.3 with Xenserver is reporting the SG
rules work as expected (though ipset update still requires VM
stop/start).
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/#review37198
---
server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java
Yes that is my understanding that all of these would go in to next maintenance
that is why they are staged in forward branch.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 1:38 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE:
any idea ?
Le 13/03/2014 16:55, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com a écrit :
Yes :
mysql select * from vlan where vlan_gateway = '10.200.244.129' and
vlan_netmask = '255.255.255.192' ;
Nux and Ove,
Did you test on fresh 4.2.1 platform?
-Wei
2014-03-14 15:07 GMT+01:00 Nux! n...@li.nux.ro:
On 14.03.2014 13:59, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Is this similar to CLOUDSTACK-5144?
Yes, but it's only exhibited on KVM.
My colleague who is testing 4.3 with Xenserver is reporting the SG rules
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19021/#review37199
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Mike Tutkowski
On March 13, 2014, 9:16
Right, I think it's dangerous to sync 4.3.1 to 4.3 because developers might
have changes in 4.3.1 that are not yet in master.
This is not my situation personally, but I imagine some devs might be in
this state.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti
sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com
I'm not sure what the offending ones are at the moment, and there was
recently a feature merge that was not squashed, so it might be a little
difficult to weed through.
On Mar 14, 2014 7:45 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com
wrote:
Can the offending check-ins be reverted or master
It may even just be a behavioral change or something simple I missed
that is now required with a recent check-in. Obviously I don't feel
comfortable merging in my feature branch though when I pull from
master and can no longer run my own feature tests.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Marcus
Yes - 4.3-forward is unstable branch and should be merged while 4.3 is going
through RC. It is meant for maintenance release.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:36 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re:
On 14.03.2014 14:29, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Nux and Ove,
Did you test on fresh 4.2.1 platform?
Yes. Fresh 4.2.1 doesn't have the problem, fresh 4.3 RC8 has the
problem.
HTH
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
Yes, and we definitely cannot just take all of 4.3.1 and put it in 4.3 as
many of those changes are intended for 4.3.1 and not 4.3.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti
sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com wrote:
Yes - 4.3-forward is unstable branch and should be merged while 4.3 is
Can you try to revert commit 175549f3ab952bbd39318c16c269c16526255475
on ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py ?
git checkout
0898a264a5463b85c4cab3033f9c3161c5ef83f8 ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py
scp to all hosts, and try again.
-Wei
2014-03-14 15:07 GMT+01:00 Nux! n...@li.nux.ro:
OK, then ignore my previous email. it looks no issue with security_group.py
2014-03-14 15:43 GMT+01:00 Nux! n...@li.nux.ro:
On 14.03.2014 14:29, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Nux and Ove,
Did you test on fresh 4.2.1 platform?
Yes. Fresh 4.2.1 doesn't have the problem, fresh 4.3 RC8 has the problem.
Yes, having a temp freeze of the codebase while a build is broken is
standard procedure at several places I've worked at.
We should probably employ such a technique here, too.
It's nothing enforced by the VCS - just something devs control when they
see such an e-mail.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at
On 14/03/14 7:09 PM, h...@apache.org h...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: cloudstack
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/4.4 [created] 3ee1fc28d
Hugo,
I was holding off merge to master, as it seems to be broken now. I see
that you already created 4.4 branch. Can we wait till master is ready to
be
Other alternative is to block further check-ins till blocking issue is fixed.
As long as BVTs are good then it can be opened up for further check ins. Just
a suggestion.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:40 AM
To:
On 14.03.2014 14:43, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Can you try to revert commit 175549f3ab952bbd39318c16c269c16526255475
on ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py ?
git checkout
0898a264a5463b85c4cab3033f9c3161c5ef83f8
./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py
scp to all hosts, and try again.
Do you happen
The build is not broken. I, personally, just cannot start VMs in my
environment, even after starting afresh. It may still be something I'm
doing (like a missed behavioral change), but I've seen at least one
bug submitted overnight that looks like a stack trace I got. It would
be nice to see if
Hi,
I'm trying to assign a JIRA ticket to someone who has a JIRA account, but I
don't see his name in the list (I see plenty of other names in the list I
recognize, though).
Any thoughts on what I might be missing here?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
Yes, I think we could have checked with people struggling to fix the
master and commit there features.
-1 for the timing to cut the branch !
On 14/03/14 8:19 pm, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
On 14/03/14 7:09 PM, h...@apache.org h...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: cloudstack
Hey Muralli,
The branch is already cut and the jenkins builds are setup. So i’m not going to
recreate the 4.4 branch from master as all the version number are already
updated.
Which merge request are you merging in? If you can squash it it will be easy to
pull into master and 4.4.
Cheers,
I announced the time when i would cut the branch in advance, so it shouldn’t be
a surprise.
But like i replied to Muralli, if you have a pending merge request on the ML i
see no problem with merging it in in the next few hours because of the trouble
with master. Just make sure it hits both
Can time be given till PST EOD as many developers are also in this time zone?
If specific features are being pulled in to 4.4, we might as well cut branch a
little later where approved merge queue is cleared.
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek
On 14/03/14 8:24 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
Hey Muralli,
The branch is already cut and the jenkins builds are setup. So i¹m not
going to recreate the 4.4 branch from master as all the version number
are already updated.
Which merge request are you merging in? If you can squash
Thanks Hugo ! Saw your reply bit late.
On 14/03/14 8:34 pm, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
I announced the time when i would cut the branch in advance, so it
shouldn¹t be a surprise.
But like i replied to Muralli, if you have a pending merge request on the
ML i see no problem with
The branch is already cut and master has already been switched to 4.5.0. I’ve
announced that the switch would be at 14:00 CET, you can’t expect me to get up
in the middle of the night to cut a release branch.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 14 mrt. 2014, at 16:09, Sudha Ponnaganti
Since a lot of devs are basing their features that have not yet been placed
in Git off of master (which is now 4.5), we need to make sure it is clear
not to rebase yourself beyond 48f8a95b06b0348ba1349cb5434183c2c18710db or
4.5 code that should not be in 4.4 could be brought into 4.4.
On Fri,
Yes, you did. I for one was up until 2AM trying to test my branch
against the current master to try to get it in, but gave up.
I think most people saw Get your merge request in today because I'll
be cutting the branch on Friday. At the time that most of us in the
west read that email, get your
On 03/14/2014 03:29 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Nux and Ove,
Did you test on fresh 4.2.1 platform?
Yes, fresh 4.2.1.
/Ove
-Wei
2014-03-14 15:07 GMT+01:00 Nux! n...@li.nux.ro:
On 14.03.2014 13:59, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Is this similar to CLOUDSTACK-5144?
Yes, but it's only exhibited on KVM.
My
On 14.03.2014 14:43, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Can you try to revert commit 175549f3ab952bbd39318c16c269c16526255475
on ./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py ?
git checkout
0898a264a5463b85c4cab3033f9c3161c5ef83f8
./scripts/vm/network/security_group.py
scp to all hosts, and try again.
I got it from
On March 13, 2014, 4:46 p.m., John Burwell wrote:
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java, line 756
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17736/diff/3/?file=518208#file518208line756
Two queries are executed in this for loop which puts stress on the
database and slows down the
On March 13, 2014, 4:55 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
Also why don't start routers in parallel? First, get all the router nics in
one query like John suggested, then span start process for routers in
separate threads, check the status of each job using Future.
Sure I will do that.
-
Fair enough, i’ll try to send a reminder for the next phases a bit earlier.
Just wanted to make sure that people wouldn’t forget to put their merge
requests in on time.
I’m trying to be a bit strict about the timing, we are already seeing the
strain on the 4.3 release which isn’t even out
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:43 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Differences between 4.3 and 4.3-forward
Yes, and we definitely cannot just take all of 4.3.1 and put it in 4.3 as many
of
Thanks Marcus. I am not aware of this convention, will remember that next
time when I do the merge.
-min
On 3/13/14 10:30 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Min, in looking at this branch merge, I need to be reminded whether we
are supposed to squash feature branches when they come in, or
Hi Talluri.
I am trying to know what causes the issue you describe. Just to make sure I
understand you, why do you think this issue is related with this change?
Anybody knows anything else about it?
Thanks. Cheers
Antonio
2014-03-14 14:17 GMT+01:00 Srikanteswararao Talluri
Before merge, I did a sanity zone and VM deployment test, and worked fine
on my setup after fixing the issues introduced by Antonio's commit. I can
verify this again today. From the symptom, it seems not related to IAM
change.
Thanks
-min
On 3/14/14 1:07 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
