On April 10, 2014, 5:19 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
engine/storage/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/ObjectInDataStoreManagerImpl.java,
line 134
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20210/diff/2/?file=554427#file554427line134
Why do we need to update the old entry and not create a
On April 10, 2014, 5:25 p.m., Min Chen wrote:
The root cause for this issue is that we didn't remove template_store_ref
entry from db when a template is deleted from a zone and only mark them as
'Destroyed'. In addition, template_view db view is created by joining with
those
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19875/#review40139
---
Commit ca67e25f2399d4c2bb7b7fde30616f6acf683f16 in cloudstack's
See
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build/160/changes
I have a server running Ubuntu 13.04. I am planning to install Xen Hypervisor
on that
(https://help.ubuntu.com/community/XenProposed#Xen_and_XAPI)
Can I then have it managed (as a host) by Cloudstack 4.2 ?
-pradeep
On 11.04.2014 10:10, Pradeep Cloudstack wrote:
I have a server running Ubuntu 13.04. I am planning to install Xen
Hypervisor on that
(https://help.ubuntu.com/community/XenProposed#Xen_and_XAPI)
Can I then have it managed (as a host) by Cloudstack 4.2 ?
Not yet, there are plans to make it
Hello there,
I’m writing nodeJS client application to interact with CloudStack.
I notice csclient and node-cloudstack modules. csclient throws API error 432
for listVirtualMachines.
Anybody has played with these modules in Node JS.
Appreciate your pointers/ recommendations.
Cheers,
Madan
Hi all,
I am trying to build cloudstack 4.2 using my laptop with Devcloud by
following this
guidehttp://www.leaseweblabs.com/2014/02/test-apache-cloudstack-4-2-local-machine/and,
everything went smooth. But when I tried to create an instance with
data disk offering I've got this following error
Hi Tina,
I have tried to get the Simulator working on branch 4.4 and I can confirm it
works fine on Ubuntu. Now, the following entries are in my version table:
4.0.0
4.1.0
4.2.0
4.2.1
4.3.0
4.4.0
Maybe you could try cloning 4.4 to a different directory, drop DB and see if
that helps.
I assume you are using local storage for primary? If so you need to adjust
the disk offering to use local storage.
On Apr 11, 2014 11:48 AM, dimas yoga pratama smid...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to build cloudstack 4.2 using my laptop with Devcloud by
following this guide
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19922/#review40150
---
Tina,
I missed this on the first review. The current change adds
True that, just xen hypervisor is not yet supported. However, if you also
install the XCP over xen hypervisor it will work.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 11.04.2014 10:10, Pradeep Cloudstack wrote:
I have a server running Ubuntu 13.04. I am planning to
Hi,
I just pushed to commits to master and cherry picked them to the 4.4
branch to resolve a long outstanding issue with the time it takes to
deploy templates and back up snapshots of RBD.
The two commits [0][1] also address the space used by RBD snapshots on
Secondary Storage.
Before
Hi All,
I have installed cloudstack 4.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. The system vm's were
correctly created and are running.
I have also installed apache2 and configured it as shown below a few lines.
I copied the ubuntu iso file to /var/www dir.
I tried to Templates - Select View ISO, Register
Hi All,
I have installed cloudstack 4.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. The system vm's were
correctly created and are running.
I have also installed apache2 and configured it as shown below a few lines.
I copied the iso file to /var/www dir.
I tried to Templates - Select View ISO, Register ISO,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19875/#review40154
---
Commit b2543efaca31bc7932ebe6ecefa963849049f39f in cloudstack's
On 03/20/2014 07:51 PM, Nux! wrote:
On 20.03.2014 18:48, Wido den Hollander wrote:
And it just went upstream! How great is that?
Pretty great. That's how open source works. :)
Quick question: there is no problem if instead of using NFS directly we
use the shared mount point option, is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20257/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Frank Zhang.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19922/
---
(Updated April 11, 2014, 2:44 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Alex
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20258/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs:
Hello,
I'm on 4.3 right now, CentOS6.5 + KVM and SG ADV zone.
What happens is that after a reboot or after disabling a zone, when the
system VMs come back the iptables rules required for their proper
functioning do not get set.
It seems to be happening randomly and it may not be affecting both
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20261/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20261/
---
(Updated April 11, 2014, 4:49 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Brian
All,
I've made the following changes to public Snapshot takeSnapshot(Long
volumeId, Long policyId, Long snapshotId, Account account, boolean
quiescevm), is this the preferred approach?
I don't get any compilation issues with this. I want to ensure I've taken
your comments on fully.
try
{
Hey it works!
Many Thanks.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
I assume you are using local storage for primary? If so you need to adjust
the disk offering to use local storage.
On Apr 11, 2014 11:48 AM, dimas yoga pratama smid...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
All,
As I've been looking through the code, I've seen a fair number of places
where return statements are called within if statements and the like. I've
always found that having one place to return is easier to debug and follow
the code flow.
Are there any guidelines on this? Or is it not
Rafael,
Once you put XCP on, do you gain features that belong to Xenserver or is it
limited in someway?
The only reason I am not using Xenserver is that I have to manage it
differently than my other hosts.
Tracy
Tracy Phillips
Weberize, Inc.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Rafael
Is secstorage.allowed.internal.sites set correctly?
Thanks,
Amogh
On 4/11/14 6:52 AM, Giri Prasad g_p...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have installed cloudstack 4.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. The system vm's
were correctly created and are running.
I have also installed apache2 and configured it as
I would like to draw attention to the aforementioned issue. With an out of
the box fresh 4.3 release setup using RBD primary, S3 secondary and KVM
hypervisors, I experience newly created volumes changing to Ovm format
soon after creation. This disables snapshotting of volumes, which worked
fine
Hi folks,
I am planning my upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.1, reading the docs here:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.1/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-4.1-to-4.2.1
.
After I register the new system vm templates, do not I need to remove the
old
H Alex,
I agree with you that would be nicer if your function fits in a
screen. Another coding convention we should adhere to. As it is I
think it not so much 'not a major concern' as too much to ask for.
Feel free to refactor and submit patches;)
Daan
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Alex
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Alex Hitchins a...@alexhitchins.com wrote:
if(snapshotInfoReturn.equals(null)){
throw new ResourceAllocationException(Take snapshot for VolumeId:
+ volumeId + failed., ResourceType.snapshot);
}
This will never throw a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20257/#review40172
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Frank Zhang
On April 11, 2014, 2:39 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20257/#review40171
---
Commit a5261cee3f63cbb30db06c7a4e5f35c8a5fa957c in cloudstack's
OK, so that should be
if(snapshotInfoReturn==null){
throw new ResourceAllocationException(Take snapshot for VolumeId:
+ volumeId + failed., ResourceType.snapshot);
}
So I get null - I should raise an exception.
Alex Hitchins | 07788 423 969 | 01892 523 587
sure,
I still don't like the fact that we need to throw an exception that we
caught one level deeper.
@Edison: can we change the internal api to throw the exception?
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Alex Hitchins a...@alexhitchins.com wrote:
OK, so that should be
Cool, once I've been over it with a test I'll update the patch.
Alex Hitchins | 07788 423 969 | 01892 523 587
-
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 11 April 2014 20:56
To: dev
Cc: Alex Hitchins;
Daan,
Are you referring to keeping line lengths up to 80 characters? Sorry - tired
eyes.
My thoughts were more that in a function there should only be one return
statement rather than many, all nested in layers of if/else statements.
Alex Hitchins | 07788 423 969 | 01892 523 587
Yes you will have to destroy the old ones and new ones will be created
based on the new template you've uploaded.
Regards
ilya
On 4/11/14, 11:29 AM, Rafael Weingartner wrote:
Hi folks,
I am planning my upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.1, reading the docs here:
When I asked about removal, I meant the template by themselves. The running
vms I knew that I would have to remove.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:28 PM, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes you will have to destroy the old ones and new ones will be created
based on the new
We are pleased to announce that Paul Angus was invited to be a committer on the
Apache Cloudstack project and that he accepted,
Join us in welcoming and congratulating Paul Angus,
-Sebastien on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
Congrats!
On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
We are pleased to announce that Paul Angus was invited to be a committer on
the Apache Cloudstack project and that he accepted,
Join us in welcoming and congratulating Paul Angus,
-Sebastien on behalf of
Congrats, Paul!
--Tuna
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@gmail.comwrote:
Congrats!
On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
We are pleased to announce that Paul Angus was invited to be a committer
on the Apache Cloudstack
Excellent news, congrats Paul!
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu t...@apache.org wrote:
Congrats, Paul!
--Tuna
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@gmail.com
wrote:
Congrats!
On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
44 matches
Mail list logo
