Hi Mike,
Is there any use case to have a more generic signature for
updateStoragePool API ?
e.g
void updateStoragePool(StoragePool storagePool, MapE,V updateDetails);
// not too sure of what should be E V as of now. To start with E V can
be String types or Enums for better static checks.
Unfortunately, at the time being, the updateStoragePool API (from the
public-facing API) only takes in bytes, IOPS, and storage tags...not
details (createStoragePool takes in a lot more parameters...including
details).
So - for now at least - we're a little limited in what the new interface
We do - in some places in the code - use a hash map...like what you
describe.
I guess the trade off there would be that the values that contain our
numbers would end up being high-level objects instead of numbers (because
we don't really know what future values might be).
I'm OK with either
In fact, we do use a hash-map approach for some KVM storage code, too.
Let's do that here, as well.
I'll make that change.
Thanks
On Friday, June 20, 2014, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
We do - in some places in the code - use a hash map...like what you
describe.
I
Hi Carlos,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com
wrote:
Hi Rohit,
Thanks for the info, but I was asking about the non-oss. Is that included
in Wido's released versions?
This is oss (I checked the 4.3 release debs, and could not find vmware jars
and other
I'll define constants for the keys in PrimaryDataStoreLifeCycle.
On Friday, June 20, 2014, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
In fact, we do use a hash-map approach for some KVM storage code, too.
Let's do that here, as well.
I'll make that change.
Thanks
On Friday, June
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22805/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-1466
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/16
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/16#issuecomment-46652904
thanks for the patch, I am applying it now, Keep it coming :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 04:46:53AM +, Rayees Namathponnan wrote:
Hi All,
Is VM snapshot supported in KVM, below doc says its supported in KVM,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots
But if I try to take vm snapshot from UI, I am getting message VM
Adding Min,
@Min, it looks like you wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Migration+of+NFS+Secondary+Storage+to+Object+Store
Can you confirm that this api (updateCloudToObjectStore) can be tested using
the simulator and an external S3 store ?
Should this work on basic
Can you ellaborate on why you think it is related to
0ff943337c20e02fd39597a0977cff531a73ecae?
thanks
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Damodar Reddy T (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
Is there a user API in cloudstack to get statistics/usage of a loadbalancer
rule?
Thanks,
Vijay V.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am using the simulator and started a basic zone.
I have an S3 object store locally (riakCS), and I am trying to add it to
the infra using the 'cloudtouseobjectstore' api with cloudmonkey.
I tried with:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22727/
---
(Updated June 20, 2014, 10:02 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and daan
On Jun 20, 2014, at 5:59 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am using the simulator and started a basic zone.
I have an S3 object store locally (riakCS), and I am trying to add it to
the infra
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22727/#review46261
---
looks good, changes in 'tests' stuff needs to be tested
- Rohit
On June 20, 2014, 10:04 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
looks good, changes in 'tests' stuff needs to be tested
please explain Rohit, Upendra didn't upload any changes to tests.
- daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Rohit,
looks like cloudmonkey is doing its job:
2014-06-20 06:00:45,030 - requester.py:41 - [DEBUG] START Request
2014-06-20 06:00:45,032 - requester.py:41 - [DEBUG] Requesting
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22256/
---
(Updated June 20, 2014, 10:21 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22807/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, Rajesh Battala, and Sateesh
I have submitted the patch for this https://reviews.apache.org/r/22807/.
Can somebody have a look into the patch?
-Original Message-
From: Anshul Gangwar [mailto:anshul.gang...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 3:32 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22727/#review46264
---
Ship it!
918c320438980f070150f872e3a3ba907572af83 in master
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22727/#review46263
---
Commit 918c320438980f070150f872e3a3ba907572af83 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22256/#review46265
---
Commit 64153a43711420224655bfbe248b4b87474a1f23 in cloudstack's
As per the code the following are the supported image store provider types
// constants for provider names
static final String NFS_IMAGE = NFS;
static final String S3_IMAGE = S3;
static final String SWIFT_IMAGE = Swift;
static final String SAMPLE_IMAGE = Sample;
static
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22808/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, Rajesh Battala, and Sateesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22256/#review46266
---
Commit 450d89094285f2363302dccc7e805466b61af9e9 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22256/#review46267
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On June 20, 2014, 10:21 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22809/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs: cloudstack-6968
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22807/#review46268
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22809/
---
(Updated June 20, 2014, 11:29 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22808/#review46269
---
Commit ed47763e2525a21fa4578d199492462d0fb1c7ef in cloudstack's
listUsageRecords api with type Load Balancer Usage
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.3/root_admin/listUsageRecords.html
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.3/root_admin/listUsageTypes.html
~Rajani
On 20-Jun-2014, at 3:09 pm, Vijay Venkatachalam
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22808/#review46270
---
Commit e7ba46b5f7da21c4fc13dc3284aa802d177045f2 in cloudstack's
Yes, looks good. Thanks for fixing this!
On Friday, June 20, 2014, Anshul Gangwar anshul.gang...@citrix.com wrote:
I have submitted the patch for this https://reviews.apache.org/r/22807/.
Can somebody have a look into the patch?
-Original Message-
From: Anshul Gangwar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22814/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22814/#review46271
---
Ship it!
committed to ovmsupport
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22809/#review46272
---
Ship it!
committed with ed47763e2525a21fa4578d199492462d0fb1c7ef
I have been poking around at the code for deploying VMs and noticed
that it appears volumes need an instance ID in order to be chosen as a
suitable volume for the VM. When I create a volume through the API it
does not have an instance ID. How do volumes get this instance ID?
Thanks,
Matt
Daan,
Could you please tag CLOUDSTACK-6460 as affecting ACS 4.3 and 4.4? Just tested
it, and it's still broken as per the detailed issue notes.
Thanks,
- Si
The specifications at [1] show that data volume shrink is only supported on KVM
and that too for QCOW2 disk types. However, I see the option to shrink on
VMware too. Can anybody point me to the matrix which specifies grow/shrink
support per hypervisor type?
Currently I am seeing unexpected
I switch to provider=S3 but I get:
530: Failed to add data store: DataCenter id is null, and simulator image
store has to be associated with a data center
On Jun 20, 2014, at 7:07 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
As per the code the following are the supported image store
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20099/
---
(Updated June 20, 2014, 3:06 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22805/
---
(Updated June 20, 2014, 3:10 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22627/#review46278
---
Commit 5638c493ff71766b8ccb74af08aa70c323e87032 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22627/#review46279
---
Commit ba270efd4b842480482953ec2c4f7641e8ad04ca in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17790/
---
(Updated June 20, 2014, 3:49 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
Hi Rohit,
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:30 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Carlos,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com
wrote:
Hi Rohit,
Thanks for the info, but I was asking about the non-oss. Is that included
in Wido's released versions?
Hi Sebastien,
I am curious why you are using updateCloudToUseObjectStore api to add S3
as a secondary store in your data center? To set up a data center using
S3, you need to use addImageStore api.
Thanks
-min
On 6/20/14 7:47 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
Not checked in yet, but here's the way that interface looks in my sandbox
now:
public interface PrimaryDataStoreLifeCycle extends DataStoreLifeCycle {
public static final String CAPACITY_BYTES = capacityBytes;
public static final String CAPACITY_IOPS = capacityIops;
void
That seems a convention in all of our APIs. For APIs with support sort of
on-behalf-of semantics, currently we are always using (account, domainId)
parameter pair, where account requires accountName. You can see similar
patterns in list APIs. Of course, we can change this, but may need to be
in
When you create a volume in the GUI, as well, it will not have an instance
ID.
Once you attach the volume to a VM, this is when the volume gets an
instance ID (the association between the volume and the VM that owns it
at the time being).
Now, I'm not sure I understand what one would do if one
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22820/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
When you deploy a VM, a root disk will be created for it automatically. I
imagine the instance ID of this root volume will be that of the VM.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
When you create a volume in the GUI, as well, it will not have an
Daan,
Please cherry-pick following from 4.4-forward to 4.4
commit 06d8d3a03f7a4efc41c45d9f67fd5b7586a78454
Author: Kelven Yang kelv...@gmail.com
Date: Thu May 29 09:35:03 2014 -0700
CLOUDSTACK-6970: Protect event interpretion from causing NPE exception
Thanks
Kelven
I already have an Nsf secondary storage. I understood that i could not add a
second secondary storage that is s3 based, and that the only way was to use the
updatecloud Api
-Sebastien
On 20 Jun 2014, at 18:49, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
I am curious why you
Is there any initial setup to be done on OVM Server or is it as simple as
selecting OVM on cloudstack with the username / password?
On 20 June 2014 14:30, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Rohit,
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:30 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Carlos,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.com
wrote:
Hi Rohit,
Thanks for the info, but I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22830/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and daan Hoogland.
Bugs:
On Jun 20, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Carlos Reátegui create...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Rohit,
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:30 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Carlos,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Carlos
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Kelven Yang kelven.y...@citrix.com wrote:
06d8d3a03f7a4efc41c45d9f67fd5b7586a78454
is in
--
Daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22820/#review46317
---
Ship it!
736bf540e8ef759a101d221622c64f3b3c3ed425 on master
-
Rayees:
Please ensure in MS Global setting kvm.snapshot.enabled=true
It defaults to false currently.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 9:47 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject:
On June 19, 2014, 8:59 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
test/integration/component/test_multipleremotevpn_vpc.py, line 144
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/diff/4/?file=611813#file611813line144
We are restarting management server, if it is kept as part of
component, then other
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/#review46326
---
test/integration/component/test_remotevpn_vpc.py
In my understanding, the setting you mentioned is applied for KVM's
volume snapshot.
Even if it is enabled, VM snapshot is not enabled for KVM deployment.
Regards,
Noji
2014-06-20 15:14 GMT-06:00 Angeline Shen angeline.s...@citrix.com:
Rayees:
Please ensure in MS Global setting
Got it. The error seems from simulator, maybe Koushik has better idea on
that. I didn't use that on simulator env though.
Thanks
-min
On 6/20/14 11:05 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
I already have an Nsf secondary storage. I understood that i could not
add a second secondary
Thanks Prasanna,
For UI its not supported, I think code not yet merged.
Mice do you have any update on this ?
Last update was on Nov/4/13 - we are waiting for new libvirt version to merge
this changes, still this is the same ?
Regards,
Rayees
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/
---
(Updated June 21, 2014, 12:20 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/
---
(Updated June 21, 2014, 2:22 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen,
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/359/
--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-234
(cloudstack-buildslave-centos6) in workspace
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build/360/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/#review46357
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On June 21, 2014, 12:20
74 matches
Mail list logo
