---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23605/#review48203
---
Commit 43dffaad5fd197c87a8dab087066f677a095dee7 in cloudstack's
Thank you, Sudha and Mike,
So I will implement some regression test on Marvin to ensure this feature.
BRs.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Thanks for the note, Sudha.
I was not aware we were treating Marvin tests are a requirement. That
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23605/#review48204
---
Why would we want to disable test cases that fail? Doesn't this
Hi,
I have production vms running on ACS 4.3 with xen 6.2 SP1.
I have requirement to change primary Secondary storage. I am planning
live storage migration for all running vms, after adding new storage as
primary storage storage in same cluster. ( correct me if i am missing
anything)..but how
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23282/#review48208
---
Ship it!
commit 03de9cc33507400e0e06ccd84a36334a4660ef4e
Author:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23282/#review48207
---
Commit 03de9cc33507400e0e06ccd84a36334a4660ef4e in cloudstack's
Heya all,
I’ve pushed support for the NuageVSP feature just now. Technically two days
after the intended feature freeze for 4.6, but i think i can get away with it
for the following reasons:
* The feature was submitted on the review board before the feature freeze
* The feature includes
On July 21, 2014, 1:03 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Why would we want to disable test cases that fail? Doesn't this mean we
need to fix something else so they don't fail anymore?
Hi Hugo,
Whenever we found a test case failing, we create bug for that, may it be a test
script issue or
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/1171/changes
Changes:
[htrippaers] CLOUDSTACK-6845 : NuageVsp Network plugin
--
[...truncated 4511 lines...]
[INFO] Compiling 146 source files to
Hey Gaurav,
That doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. If the test sequence fails because of a
bug it should keep failing until the bug is resolved, otherwise the tests will
report that the situation is OK while in all reality it is not. These test
should be in indication that Apache CloudStack
In the case that it's a product bug, wouldn't it be better to keep running the
test even if you know it's going to fail? That way, you get a consistent view
of the overall pass rate from build to build. If you disable all the tests that
are failing, you're going to get a 100% pass rate, but you
Should be fixed by commit 40d133dd7358be1940edd8e2a776e035c230c226
I didn’t see the error on my dev system as the proper jar file was present in
my local maven cache so it could be found by mvm during the regular compile.
Good find by Jenkins.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 21 jul. 2014, at 11:01,
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/1172/changes
Changes:
[htrippaers] NuageVSP is a noredist component
--
Started by user Hugo
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-a84
On 15/07/14 3:29 AM, Silvano Nogueira Buback silv...@corp.globo.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
At Globo.com we are working in a load balancer plugin for Cloudstack
with a network api developed internally. This api manages shared networks
and is working with cloudstack 4.3 (as a network guru
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/1173/changes
Hugo, Stephen,
We have been following this practice as part of Continuous Integration
changes as defined in doc [1]. I personally think that tagging test case
with BugId is good idea to map the test cases with bugs, but the test case
should not be skipped when tagged. We can have discussion on
On 19 jul. 2014, at 02:49, Suresh Ramamurthy
suresh.ramamur...@nuagenetworks.net wrote:
snip
I had following questions regarding compiling only nuagevsp plugin
a) To build only nuagevsp, is below command correct.
mvn clean install -P developer,nuagevsp
Correct
b) To run client
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23603/
---
(Updated July 21, 2014, 9:53 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kishan
Hi Vihar,
Are you referring to /etc/resolv.conf on the VR itself or on the guest VM?
On the VR itself, there are only two entries on /etc/resolv.conf pointing
to both Google public DNS servers.
On the guest VM, there are 3 entries, one to the VR and two to the Google
public DNS servers. If I
Hey Santosh,
On the wiki page there are two URLs in the paragraph of the Log Upload Job that
i (and presumably a majority of the community can’t access) can you fix this?
This is bit:
Log Uploader Job: This job post the CI run uploads all logs to nfs share. All
logs post the run are available
sure. Those are example ref links, anyways, i just updated some thing like
below, please let me know if its ok.
Log Uploader Job: This job post the CI run uploads all logs to nfs share. All
logs post the run are available under designated nfs share at configured
location in CI, EX:
Santosh, Talluri,
Can you guys make sure the functional tests created by Suresh are integrated in
the CI runs?
test/integration//component/test_nuage_vsp.py
Cheers,
Hugo
On 15 jul. 2014, at 14:07, Suresh Ramamurthy
suresh.ramamur...@nuagenetworks.net wrote:
Hi All,
Can any one please
All,
Alex, wanted to disable test cases in between CI( continuous integration) runs
for the below reason for failures. I only, provided a way to achieve the same
using tags, so that it will work for dual purpose, one not to effect community
and can be used in CI as well, it will not effect if
Hey Santosh,
For keeping track of which component fails its generally better to let jenkins
figure it out. As we use nosetest (i think) we can store all the test reports
and jenkins can determine which component failed in which test run without
having to disable tests. Especially if
In the beginning to get CI up and running, it would be ok to disable these
handful of tests while getting fixes in, to achieve 100% pass rates. When CI
runs in production, code changes need to be reverted if there are any new
failures to keep CI pass rates at 100% (a known state to make CI
Ok,
I didn’t realize they were samples, isn’t the CI system running somewhere
already? So the logs should be available somewhere right?
Cheers,
Hugo
On 21 jul. 2014, at 12:09, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com
wrote:
sure. Those are example ref links, anyways, i just updated
Hey Sudha,
Sorry, but i disagree. The purpose of tests should not be to get a 100% pass
rate. The tests should show an accurate state of the how the tests are doing
versus the current state of the branch being tested. If tests fail we should
fix why the tests fails and the system should not
Yes, its running inside now and so logs are available only to internal users,
but there was a discussion on dev list to make it public, which was not
concluded( i believe ). Once it will be made public, we can adopt the similar
approach to facilitate others for viewing\other action.
Regards,
Hi,
I found this article http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX135229
I was just going through this but could not get some of the points.
Currently I have no snapshots and all templates are public another
secondary storage is not added yet.
1) In above article 2nd point says Copy the snapshots
For the first part I am planning to add parameters to global settings.
But for the 2nd part I think it depends on where we are integrating this plugin.
To start with I will integrate it with abstract layer of Authenticator
implementations and we can override in the corresponding authenticator
Tagging is good: that will allow you to see whether a failure is new or known
about. Maybe the tag could even contain a date when it was added, to spot
failures which are not receiving attention. But I don’t like to see tests
skipped whenever we have a bug that is causing them to fail.
--
abandoning vote due to bad quorum :(
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
Ran into issue when trying to upgrade from 4.2.1. Got the following
database upgrade failure: http://pastebin.com/wkkAVYu0
Jira:
Hugo,
I absolutely agree with you that tests should not be disabled and fixes should
be made before check in.
As per what Alex has mentioned in his CI enablement mail [1], premise of CI is
that it runs at 100% pass rates and if any check in causes failure in CI Run,
the bad check-in is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23603/#review48211
---
Commit 58bad41910970fb3b08aa4d21875af6d04c8bf2e in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23603/#review48212
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kishan Kavala
On July 21, 2014, 3:23 p.m.,
Is there not a way we could have the best of both worlds? Tag them, but leave
them running, and reject a check-in if it triggers a failure in an untagged
test only?
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
Sent: 21 July 2014
Hey Sudha,
OK, clear.
I agree the CI system should be running as soon as possible.
However the automated revert bit, i don’t agree with and will give a -1 on that.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 21 jul. 2014, at 13:42, Sudha Ponnaganti sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com wrote:
Hugo,
I absolutely agree with
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/
---
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland, John Dilley, Santhosh Edukulla,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23737/
---
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland, Hugo Trippaers, and Wei Zhou.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/#review48216
---
tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced.cfg
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/#review48217
---
tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced.cfg
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22863/#review48220
---
Can you rebase on latest master as the patch currently fails to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23737/#review48219
---
tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced.cfg
Hey Chiradeep,
Thanks for taking a look. I’ve now re-done this work, but carefully and cleanly
and on top of current master, in 37 small commits instead of 2 scary ones.
Please take a look at
https://github.com/schubergphilis/cloudstack/compare/systemvm-refactor
Summarizing this kind of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23609/#review48224
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On July 17, 2014, 9:22
That article only applied to ACS 4.1 and older versions. In ACS 4.2
storage refactor, db tables are changed. template_host_ref has been
deprecated and replaced with template_store_ref.
Thanks
-min
On 7/21/14 3:47 AM, Tejas Gadaria refond.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found this article
On July 17, 2014, 4:55 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java, line 960
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23617/diff/1/?file=634289#file634289line960
Why is it made create=true when it is not a BaseAyncCreate cmd ?
create=true should be added only when
+1. Very well-written FS and email, Rohit. Those open questions are very
valid, I added a little comment in your FS regarding the flow.
Thanks
-min
On 7/20/14 8:35 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm assuming no one objects the proposal and the spec, I'll move forward
with
Rohit,
definite +1
Thanks,
ilya
On 7/20/14, 8:35 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi,
I'm assuming no one objects the proposal and the spec, I'll move forward
with the first implementation starting next week but will be mostly
offline till 28th July.
Regards.
Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi guys,
There has
We are trying to abstract router vm completely from our environment as
it has dual nics which is big no no in hardened security environments.
This is for shared (non-vpc) advanced security zone.
CloudStack already has a support for Baremetal DHCP Server under
Network Service Providers.
Hi Hugo,
Do you have any ETA for this ?
Regards,
Rayees
-Original Message-
From: Rayees Namathponnan
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:27 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tomcat version issue while building cloudstack on RHEL7 RPMS
Thanks Hugo, defect
Hi Hugo,
Thanks for reviewing NuageVsp plugin on time and making it part for
CloudStack's virtual networking solution.
Thanks,
Suresh
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
Heya all,
I’ve pushed support for the NuageVSP feature just now. Technically two
On July 21, 2014, 2:02 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Can you rebase on latest master as the patch currently fails to apply.
Cheers,
Hugo
patching file api/src/com/cloud/network/Network.java
Hunk #1 FAILED at 132.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 224 (offset 3 lines).
1 out of 2
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22863/
---
(Updated July 21, 2014, 7:25 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Hugo
Silvano,
This is not exactly a help you've asked about. But something along the
similar concept, we've requested a feature known as IP POOL.
As an example, you have several networks either guest or public that can
be put into 1 large pool. In case network x runs out of IP space, you
would
Do you want to acquire IPs for the VIP (front-end)?
From: Silvano Nogueira Buback
silv...@corp.globo.commailto:silv...@corp.globo.com
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Date: Monday, July 14, 2014 at 2:59
Are you trying to get rid of the virtual router? Have you looked at the DNSAPI
implementation discussed earlier?
From: ilya musayev
ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.commailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Pierre-Luc,
I¹ve closed the bug as invalid. Here is the explanation why:
The first attempt to upgrade failed because the new system template wasn't
pre-downloaded prior to upgrade (the requirement reflected in Release
notes, for the cases when template is changed between CS versions)
What should
Hey Rayees,
Not really, but at least before the 4.6 feature freeze. By that time centos 7
will be stable and we will some time to properly test will all the new versions
of the components.
Cheers,
Hugo
Sent from my iPhone
On 21 jul. 2014, at 20:47, Rayees Namathponnan
Folks,
Looks like I have a job stuck in the async queue that I need to clear. How do
you clear out the async queue please?
Thanks
Matt
Hi All,
You can see the current master builds automation status at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/RAGTAg
Simulator 100% pass
KVM 4 failures
Xen 2 failures
There is no new issue reported with latest build
Regards,
Rayees
Its not a false positive though, the complain is about possible null
de-reference, the calling method declaration and definition provides that
scope, i now made a change to accommodate null checks for vnetid and protocol
values, only inside few cases where it is locally applicable, submitted a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23750/
---
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland, Koushik Das, and Hugo Trippaers.
Dear all,
Suddenly I am not able to create new VMs on my zone. The error message I
found on management-server.log:
2014-07-22 11:25:51,632 INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-3:job-17146 = [ b780cd9c-2d0b-499f-b396-269064995e30 ])
Unable to contact resource.
Hi,
I'm thinking Wido knows the answer to this, but - of course - anyone feel
free to chime in. :)
I was looking at this video of Wido's from CCCEU13 in Amsterdam:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57voBP_zdf8feature=youtu.be
In it, Wido talks about cloning a template on the Ceph cluster, then
Hi Min,
Thanks for clarification,
template_store_ref provided me install_path secondary storage id
information. it was quite helpful.
I found this blog
http://stankirdey.com/content/cloudstack-merging-secondary-storages
but he is using `template_host_ref`for ACS 4.2.
Is there any documented
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23679/#review48342
---
Commit 88f35179ef90dc4f7696b6fe2e8ee7ca4d00586c in cloudstack's
67 matches
Mail list logo
