Denis
You havent mentioned anything about your setup and CloudStack version.
Regards,
ilya
On 7/29/14, 1:42 AM, Denis Finko wrote:
Hello CloudStack Developers,
Could you please help me to investigate or understand following issue with time
out:
When I am creating new VMs from CloudStack
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/1/
--
[...truncated 4777 lines...]
Results :
Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO]
[INFO]
On July 31, 2014, 4:19 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
plugins/network-elements/brocade-vcs/src/com/cloud/network/brocade/BrocadeVcsApi.java,
line 482
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24111/diff/1/?file=646144#file646144line482
Message info seems to be corrected.
Hi Santhosh,
What
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24111/#review49213
---
Ok, thanks
git cherry didn't pick those three up.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Daan,
That commit is already there in 4.4 branch. See
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=6ba541a
fb73475758a62a17dae1ec1be088da810.
Rajani, we can't cut a new master from 4.4
Leo's work on comparing the branches showed us that. So the new flow will
be limited To master land 4.5+
biligual spelling checker used.read at your own risk
Op 31 jul. 2014 06:22 schreef Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
:
For the git flow:
I answerred this from my phone but it did't get through so here my
comment again:
We can't cut a new master from 4.4 without enormous work. I spend two
days on getting 4.4 in line with 4.4-forward and as Leo has shown the
work for getting all features from master into master will be much
greater.
On Jul 31, 2014, at 12:55 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
I suppose it would work like this:
1. In the original model, every release branch would be deleted after merge
into develop and master branch. There is no release/4.4.1 or release/4.5
branch.
2. Say we don't follow original
Heya,
I’m setting up a separate build (build-master-simulator) to test the build
process of the simulator. At least we’ll be notified if any failures occur in
the build next time. I don’t think it should be included in the regular build,
it’s not something we would like to ship to end-users
This is cool.
Santhosh
From: Trippie [trip...@gmail.com] on behalf of Hugo Trippaers
[h...@trippaers.nl]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 4:27 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Edison Su
Subject: Re: Simulator on master is not building
Heya,
I’m setting
All,
Iam not sure if it is already available, so i added a simple wiki with few
notes for new submission and review process at the link below.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Code+Submission+and+Review+Guidelines
In case, if there are any issues with the wiki, please
On Jul 31, 2014, at 3:39 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I answerred this from my phone but it did't get through so here my
comment again:
We can't cut a new master from 4.4 without enormous work. I spend two
days on getting 4.4 in line with 4.4-forward and as Leo has
to start using git-flow from 4.5+, we need to have the latest stable version
which can be master and I assumed that would be 4.4
point 2. should be modified assuming no previous releases
2a. branch ‘develop’ from 'master’
2b. branch ‘release/4.5' from the develop
2c. merge ‘release/4.5' to
On Jul 30, 2014, at 5:13 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
and merge it in other needed branches (master and develop)
that
On Jul 31, 2014, at 4:46 AM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
to start using git-flow from 4.5+, we need to have the latest stable version
which can be master and I assumed that would be 4.4
point 2. should be modified assuming no previous releases
2a. branch ‘develop’ from
I updated the wiki
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git#Git-Gitflow
~Rajani
On 31-Jul-2014, at 2:47 pm, Sebastien Goasguen
run...@gmail.commailto:run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 31, 2014, at 4:46 AM, Rajani Karuturi
Hi,
Please use this section on the wiki to propose/fix/modify the new proposed
check-in process:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git#Git-ProposedGitflowbasedCheck-inProcess
My feedback:
- I don’t want to enforce/adopt the gitflow model as-is, like not rename
master
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/2/changes
Changes:
[santhosh.edukulla] Added Coverity Fixes
--
[...truncated 4854 lines...]
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @
cloud-quickcloud ---
ahh… we have the same content twice on the wiki. I deleted the duplicate and
edited it as per the comment from daan.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git#Git-ProposedGitflowbasedCheck-inProcess
+1 for starting a vote thread
~Rajani
On 31-Jul-2014, at 3:04 pm, Rohit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24147/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Repository: cloudstack-git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24148/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Hi Rajani,
On 31-Jul-2014, at 11:55 am, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
ahh… we have the same content twice on the wiki. I deleted the duplicate and
edited it as per the comment from daan.
Hey,
Citrix off-lined the node used to build systemvm templates a while ago. Today i
managed to replace it with a new node so systemvm templates should start
building again.
Cheers,
Hugo
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/3/changes
Changes:
[htrippaers] Fix dependency issue in apidoc, depends on server as that is where
ApiXmlDocWriter lives
--
[...truncated 4854 lines...]
[INFO] ---
I’ve removed the following nodes because they have been offline for quite a
while now:
build-hyperv
devcloud-continueos-tests
HyperV2
rpmbuilder
The remaining nodes can pickup most of the jobs, with the exception of all
windows based jobs.
It anybody willing to host a windows slave for
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
I’ve removed the following nodes because they have been offline for quite
a while now:
build-hyperv
devcloud-continueos-tests
HyperV2
rpmbuilder
The remaining nodes can pickup most of the jobs, with the exception
Hi All,
We had long discussions on the git flow.
I tried to capture the summary of it @
http://markmail.org/message/j5z7dxjcqxfkfhpj
This is updated on wiki @
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git#Git-ProposedGitflowbasedCheck-inProcess
and is up for a vote:
Can you share
Erik,
I don’t have complete specs yet, but vm or bare metal doesn’t matter at all. So
anything is good. On the box we need java, jenkins slave service, wix and i
think visual studio.
This is the procedure we use to build the hyper agent, if the box can run this
we are good to go:
— copy —
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/5/changes
Changes:
[santhosh.edukulla] Fixed a simple coverity issue
--
[...truncated 1263 lines...]
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/6/
Rajani,
To make it clear for everyone. This is the vote to adopt this new way of
working right? Or is it just to get an opinion on the proposal?
If it is indeed the vote to adopt this way of working it means that all
committers will change how we interact with the branches in the CloudStack
On Jul 31, 2014, at 4:27 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
Heya,
I’m setting up a separate build (build-master-simulator) to test the build
process of the simulator. At least we’ll be notified if any failures occur in
the build next time. I don’t think it should be included in
On 31 jul. 2014, at 12:44, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 31, 2014, at 4:27 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
Heya,
I’m setting up a separate build (build-master-simulator) to test the build
process of the simulator. At least we’ll be notified if any
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23982/#review49217
---
test/integration/smoke/test_nic.py
+1
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi All,
We had long discussions on the git flow.
I tried to capture the summary of it @
http://markmail.org/message/j5z7dxjcqxfkfhpj
This is updated on wiki @
+1
Hugo, I think we started this voting thread to get opinion on the proposal. I
feel it may need some iteration and community agreement before we adopt it.
Suggestions, flames and opinions are welcome.
Regards.
On 31-Jul-2014, at 12:43 pm, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
Rajani,
Hi Hugo,
Its mainly to get an opinion on the proposal.
I am expecting all the active committers to take a look at it and raise any
concerns they have.
If we don’t get any -1’s or edits, we should start on it.
Post voting, if its approved, we should do the required git branch changes as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24152/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharchyk and Sheng Yang.
Bugs:
+1
PL
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi Hugo,
Its mainly to get an opinion on the proposal.
I am expecting all the active committers to take a look at it and raise
any concerns they have.
If we don’t get any -1’s or edits, we should
On Jul 31, 2014, at 12:28 PM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git#Git-ProposedGitflowbasedCheck-inProcess
...
is up for a vote:
+1
- Leo
Hi,
Santosh put together a good wiki page on how to validate local changes using
our Python/marvin based build verification tests (path:
test/integration/smoke):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Validating+check-ins+for+your+local+changes%2C+using+Simulator
I’ve a mini
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/14/
--
[...truncated 1265 lines...]
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @
cloud-engine-components-api ---
[INFO] Compiling 31
+1 from me.
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com]
Sent: 31 July 2014 11:28
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] git workflow
Hi All,
We had long discussions on the git flow.
I tried to capture the summary of it @
+1 on the proposal
Cheers,
Hugo
On 31 jul. 2014, at 14:31, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote:
+1 from me.
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com]
Sent: 31 July 2014 11:28
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] git
Got it approved, so we can sponsor a machine.
1) is there a specific jenkins version needed or should i use the latest?
2) what firewall ports should be opened (ingress)?
3) does anyone know if the free visual studio version is enough?
Erik
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Hugo Trippaers
+1
-sebastien
On Jul 31, 2014, at 8:37 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
+1 on the proposal
Cheers,
Hugo
On 31 jul. 2014, at 14:31, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote:
+1 from me.
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24154/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7215
+1
On Thursday, July 31, 2014, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
+1 on the proposal
Cheers,
Hugo
On 31 jul. 2014, at 14:31, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com
javascript:; wrote:
+1 from me.
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi
To answer myself, it's all taken care of
Erik
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
Got it approved, so we can sponsor a machine.
1) is there a specific jenkins version needed or should i use the latest?
2) what firewall ports should be opened (ingress)?
I have an environment that i upgraded to 4.4 before seeing this where my
system vms will not start. Is there a procedure to upgrade the system vm
templates after the fact? mostly all of the current instances are still
working but users can't create new instances.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:42 AM,
+1
Something that may need to be adjusted...
If two different people are working on different hotfixes for 4.4, lets say
they are for bugs CS-1234 and CS-5678, then in the current model they would
both push their hotfix to 'hotfix/4.4.1'. This will cause branch naming
collisions which could be
normally, you would add the as systemvm4.4 from the UI prior to upgrade
using the link to the new systemvm corresponding to your hypervisor. Then
perform the upgrade on MS. Once back in the UI, the vRouters will have an
upgrade feature. For Console and SSVM, delete and recreate
On Thu, Jul
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/15/changes
Much obliged Erik!
Cheers,
Hugo
On 31 jul. 2014, at 17:17, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
To answer myself, it's all taken care of
Erik
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
Got it approved, so we can sponsor a machine.
1) is there a
+1 on the proposal.
Regards,
--
Olivier Lemasle
Apalia
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
+1
Something that may need to be adjusted...
If two different people are working on different hotfixes for 4.4, lets say
they are for bugs CS-1234 and
4.4.0 tag is working correctly, as is master branch.
Any fix or advice appreciated.
Erik
-- compile output
Target CoreCompile:
Tool C:\PROGRA~2\MONO-3~1.3\bin\mcs.bat
execution started with arguments: /noconfig
Hello,
I am building acs 4.4, but when i verify the gpg keys, here is the warnign
that i got :
gpg --verify apache-cloudstack-4.4.0-src.tar.bz2.asc
gpg: Signature faite le mer. 16 juil. 2014 14:09:59 CEST avec la cl? RSA ID
AA4736F3
gpg: Bonne signature de ? Daan Hoogland d...@apache.org ?
gpg:
But with the md5 way, no problem this looks good.
2014-07-31 17:49 GMT+02:00 benoit lair kurushi4...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I am building acs 4.4, but when i verify the gpg keys, here is the warnign
that i got :
gpg --verify apache-cloudstack-4.4.0-src.tar.bz2.asc
gpg: Signature faite le mer.
On Jul 31, 2014, at 11:51 AM, benoit lair kurushi4...@gmail.com wrote:
But with the md5 way, no problem this looks good.
It is just that Daan's key has not been signed by anybody else yet.
2014-07-31 17:49 GMT+02:00 benoit lair kurushi4...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I am building acs 4.4,
+1
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi All,
We had long discussions on the git flow.
I tried to capture the summary of it @
http://markmail.org/message/j5z7dxjcqxfkfhpj
This is updated on wiki @
Ok, Thanks
2014-07-31 17:58 GMT+02:00 Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com:
On Jul 31, 2014, at 11:51 AM, benoit lair kurushi4...@gmail.com wrote:
But with the md5 way, no problem this looks good.
It is just that Daan's key has not been signed by anybody else yet.
2014-07-31 17:49
Hello,
Does the rpms hosted on http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.4/ are already
nonoss ?
Thanks for your response.
Regards, Benoit.
Ok i have found my response :
--
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com
Date: 2014-02-18 9:10 GMT+01:00
Subject: RE: 4.2.0 Installation Guide Section 3.7 Building Non-OSS
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Michael,
I see, thanks for explanation.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 10:02 PM
To: Anthony Xu; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Simulator on master is not building
There is a separate simulator DB where all these VOs are used. These are only
Don't trust that guy.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:06 PM, benoit lair kurushi4...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, Thanks
2014-07-31 17:58 GMT+02:00 Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com:
On Jul 31, 2014, at 11:51 AM, benoit lair kurushi4...@gmail.com wrote:
But with the md5 way, no problem this looks
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
On Jul 31, 2014, at 12:55 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
I suppose it would work like this:
1. In the original model, every release branch would be deleted after
merge
into develop and master branch.
+1
Mark
On Jul 31, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com
wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi All,
We had long discussions on the git flow.
I tried to capture the summary of it @
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24111/
---
(Updated July 31, 2014, 5:57 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Hugo
On July 31, 2014, 7:01 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
plugins/network-elements/brocade-vcs/src/com/cloud/network/brocade/BrocadeVcsApi.java,
line 482
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24111/diff/1/?file=646144#file646144line482
This particular try\except is for an IO exception
I am trying to use devcloud to deploy my xenserver (I do this all the
time). I am getting this same issue with the 4.3 branch. I am only
running one management server though. Seb, did you change anything else to
get this working?
On my server I am seeing the following:
[c.c.a.ApiServer]
I am having the same problem. I have started from scratch 3 or 4 times now
and still no luck. I am cleaning my XenServer each time and I am starting
from a fresh build each time with CS.
I am not sure where this bug is coming from. Did you do anything specific
to get past this bug?
I am using
+0, based on my opinion on another thread git commit process.
--Sheng
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Mark Hinkle mark.hin...@citrix.com
wrote:
+1
Mark
On Jul 31, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti
sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Rajani
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ove Ewerlid [mailto:ove.ewer...@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 9:09 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 32 vs 64 bit systemvm on 43 and secondary
Devs,
It seems there is a big problem in the 4.4 release. The templates need
a new java version but the ms seems to have no logic to automatically
update the templates when found in the system. Is the code from older
updates never generalized, in master or easily protable from 4.3? Can
anyone
since 4.3 the management-server can tell if systemvm and VR require
upgrade, which is great ! but, as of 4.4 it's not working anymore and
systemvm must be upgrade as well.
And what if their is another hartbleed issue between release requiring
upgrade of systemvm ?
Citrix is providing a Python
+1 on the proposal. But I second Rohit and Sheng Yang - we should agree on
all the flow points before we adopt it for CloudStack. We can¹t just
blindly follow http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/,
plus some use cases are not explained there as I¹ve pointed in one of my
previous
On Jul 31, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
wrote:
+1 on the proposal. But I second Rohit and Sheng Yang - we should agree on
all the flow points before we adopt it for CloudStack. We can¹t just
blindly follow
Done, updated the wiki page with my comments. Copy/pasting here:
Open items:
1) Which bugs can be submitted to develop branch directly.
Document http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ mentions
that the
*hotfix branch should be created for the blocker/critical bugs in the
current
Hey Will,
Unfortunately no, I didn't take any special steps to get around the issue.
I cleaned everything up, tried again and it worked.
Sorry I can't be of more help here.
Talk to you later,
Mike
On Thursday, July 31, 2014, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
I am having the same
Pretty sure I'm seeing this bug[1] with an installation that has been
upgraded from ACS43 to ACS44.
I can see it got commited to 4.4-forward but not commited to 4.4.0 tag as
far as i can see.
Does anyone know of a workaround or fix?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6893
--
+ Abhi
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:14 PM
To: dev
Subject: [ACS44] template upgrade code
Devs,
It seems there is a big problem in the 4.4 release. The templates need a new
java version but the ms seems
Sorry, ignore #2. I’ve read on the model more, and realized that master
branch would reflect the branch that has been released, not the current
release.
So only #1 is yet to be addressed.
-alena.
On 7/31/14, 2:03 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
wrote:
Done, updated the wiki
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 5:12 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: How to speed up testing using BVT/smoke tests with Simulator
Hi,
Santosh put together a good wiki page on how to validate local
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/1280/changes
Changes:
[bfederle] createForm, dyanmic input type: Pass in context
--
[...truncated 2697 lines...]
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @
Hi Edison,
Thanks for the pointers! I’ll try them out and see if there is way to do it on
Travis/CloudBees as well and I hope other people will religiously start using
simulator/bvt (at least the basic ones) for their check-ins.
Regards.
On 01-Aug-2014, at 12:15 am, Edison Su
Comments in-line;
On 31-Jul-2014, at 11:03 pm, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
wrote:
Done, updated the wiki page with my comments. Copy/pasting here:
Open items:
1) Which bugs can be submitted to develop branch directly.
Document
Thank you, Rohit. Couple more things we have to clarify in the wiki. The
doc says Developer should run the BVT on the simulator before doing a
checkin², but it doesn¹t mention anything about the CI. So here are my
questions:
1) CI execution
* on which branches we are planning to run the CI
*
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/1281/changes
In fact we're think about the ultimate solution for it.
Utilize deb repo.
But we haven't got time to implement it yet. Hope we can get this idea on
track soon.
--Sheng
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com
wrote:
since 4.3 the management-server can tell if
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Comments in-line;
On 31-Jul-2014, at 11:03 pm, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
Done, updated the wiki page with my comments. Copy/pasting here:
Open items:
1) Which bugs can be
Taking a look at it. Maybe a cherry-pick from 4.4-forward to 4.4 was missed.
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 9:18 PM
To: dev
Subject: Building of Hyper-V Agent seems broken in 4.4 branch
4.4.0 tag is
The commits are not applied in correct order.
This commit 8fb89cdc8e2dff60d49fecd3e51a9bf997061035 is applied after
ef0cec938165fdf3531f92dc8f4c2930ff95fa5e. The later commit has resolve
conflicts in cherry-picking. It was not resolved correctly which introduces
this build failure.
Regards,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24174/
---
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Devdeep Singh.
Bugs:
I have created the patch https://reviews.apache.org/r/24174/ to fix the issue.
Is it ok to go ahead and commit it into 4.4 branch?
Regards,
Anshul
-Original Message-
From: Anshul Gangwar [mailto:anshul.gang...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 10:22 AM
To:
1. yes, test cases currently run in parallel in ci environment, using parallel
nose commands.
2. There were few hard codings for sleep, where we removed at some places,
still there could be few\many out there.
3. 1 sec sleep and poll check is too heavy i believe, for async. So, worst a
test
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24111/#review49323
---
96 matches
Mail list logo
