Hiii
I'm building CS in DevCloud in VitualBox. While building the CS using
mvn-P developer,systemvm clean install command it's
displaying an error. I attached the screenshot of error in .png image
could someone please help out regarding this issue?
Hiii
I'm building CS in DevCloud in VitualBox. While building the CS using
mvn-P developer,systemvm clean install command it's
displaying an error. I attached the screenshot of error in .png image
could someone please help out regarding this issue?
Images are stripped on the mailing list.
On 1 Aug 2014 07:23, Priyanka Deepala priyanka.deepal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hiii
I'm building CS in DevCloud in VitualBox. While building the CS using
mvn-P developer,systemvm clean install command it's
displaying an error. I
+1
On 31 Jul 2014 21:33, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
wrote:
+1 on the proposal. But I second Rohit and Sheng Yang - we should agree on
all the flow points before we adopt it for CloudStack. We can¹t just
blindly follow http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/,
I attached the image in this mail please check it out
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Images are stripped on the mailing list.
On 1 Aug 2014 07:23, Priyanka Deepala priyanka.deepal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hiii
I'm building CS in DevCloud in
Priyanka,
Images and other attachments are not accepted on this mailinglist. Either
provide a link to the image or paste your error as plain text.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 1 aug. 2014, at 09:23, Priyanka Deepala priyanka.deepal...@gmail.com wrote:
I attached the image in this mail please check it
This is the error
[INFO]---
BUILD FAILURE
--
Total time: 33:01.074s
Finished at: Thu Jul 31 15:15:55 UTC 2014
Final Memory: 73M/178M
Anshul, go ahead.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Anshul Gangwar
anshul.gang...@citrix.com wrote:
I have created the patch https://reviews.apache.org/r/24174/ to fix the issue.
Is it ok to go ahead and commit it into 4.4 branch?
Regards,
Anshul
-Original Message-
From: Anshul
H,
In the last couple of days a lot of problems with 4.4.0 have been
reported. Workarounds, if at all available, are hard and require
intimate sysadmin experience. It seems to me we didn't deliver the
quality we want to.
One of the problems is that the systemvms need an upgrade because of
our
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Work need to be tested, but create one branch for every bug seems over doing.
Branch in Git suppose to use with substantial changes.
Actually, I don't agree with you on that point. I think git is unusual among
source control systems in that the git
Hi,
On 01-Aug-2014, at 1:59 am, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Work need to be tested, but create one branch for every bug seems over
doing. Branch in Git suppose to use with substantial changes. I don't think
anyone would like the idea to have 2 commits for every bug fixes(one merge
On 01-Aug-2014, at 1:40 am, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
wrote:
Thank you, Rohit. Couple more things we have to clarify in the wiki. The
doc says Developer should run the BVT on the simulator before doing a
checkin², but it doesn¹t mention anything about the CI. So here are
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24174/#review49335
---
Commit cda088470b069b4361e87e12e96f2769305e96d9 in cloudstack's
The order of cherry-picked commits is not maintained. i.e. the order in which
commits are made in 4.4-forwrad is not same in 4.4. This will create more
regressions instead of fixing.
One fix(Hyper-V agent build is broken) which I made is occurred due to this. To
verify fixes, which one has
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24174/#review49336
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Aug. 1, 2014, 5:21 a.m.,
Applied the patch to 4.4 branch and pushed. Thanks Anshul.
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 1, 2014 2:13 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Building of Hyper-V Agent seems broken in 4.4 branch
Anshul, go ahead.
H
Marvin complains it doesn't have requests =2.2.1. pip says it has
2.3.0. Should I downgrade?
\\ebi\daan:~/cloudstack-4.4/cloudstack (4.4) sudo pip show requests
---
Name: requests
Version: 2.3.0
Location: /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages
Requires:
\\ebi\daan:~/cloudstack-4.4/cloudstack
Priyanka, no images on this list, please cut and paste the text
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Priyanka Deepala
priyanka.deepal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hiii
I'm building CS in DevCloud in VitualBox. While building the CS using
mvn-P developer,systemvm clean install command it's displaying
Thanks all :-)
--
Erik
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Devdeep Singh devdeep.si...@citrix.com
wrote:
Applied the patch to 4.4 branch and pushed. Thanks Anshul.
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 1,
Because we throw away the tag on a released version that way.
Maybe we should anyway as 4.4 has barely or not been tested before
releasing. Most if not all testing by citrix qa has been done on
4.4-forward and hardly anyone else has or manages to upgrade (clean
installs seem to work).
On Fri,
This is the error
[INFO]---
BUILD FAILURE
--
Total time: 33:01.074s
Finished at: Thu Jul 31 15:15:55 UTC 2014
Final Memory: 73M/178M
Priyanka,
It displayed an error before this summary. the project apidoc failed,
that much is clear. Please give more information. Preferably put the
full output of the mvn command in a pastebin and send a link to the
list. That way people can do better diagnoses of your problem.
kind regards,
Priyanka,
I had this issue when building on Windows. Are you building on Windows?
I think you posted a question recently about doing so.
It doesn't work as I believe file paths are different between Win/Lin
systems.
Really, my advice to you is to do your dev on a Linux flavour or OSX.
Does the
I'm building on Windows. Last time I used Cygwin but now I'm using DevCloud2.0
which is running on VirtualBox http://virtualbox.org/(Debian OS). Will
it work?
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Alex Hitchins a...@alexhitchins.com wrote:
Priyanka,
I had this issue when building on Windows. Are
Priyanka,
I have a windows build in the office (not in now) it builds fine. Also
lots of people work on debian devcloud instances. both should work
fine.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Priyanka Deepala
priyanka.deepal...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm building on Windows. Last time I used Cygwin but now
Hi,
Since a workaround available I don't think removing it is necessary.
However, I think users should be made aware via the site and 4.4
documentation that there is known issues and that upgrading is possibly
dangerous.
I just built cs master and ran python setup.py install under tools/marvin
folder, i could see that requests version 2.3.0 is properly validated.
=Logs==
Using /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paramiko-1.14.0-py2.7.egg
Searching for requests==2.3.0
Best match:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Santhosh Edukulla
santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com wrote:
import requests
print requests.__version__
print requests.__path__
seems fine:
\\ebi\daan:~/cloudstack-4.4/cloudstack (4.4) python
Python 2.7.5 (default, Mar 9 2014, 22:15:05)
[GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple
If you get hit by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6893
there is no workaround in 4.4.0 as far as I know.
you can download the patch and apply it to 4.4.0 and rebuild, but then it
isn't 4.4.0 any more is it?
I've been hit by it in lab once, I don't know if it only happens in some
fixed it: i had marvin installed with pip from dist/Marvin*
did pip uninstall and then python setup.py install
now it finds the marvin nose plugin,
thanks Santhosh
In retrospective: pip install should have worked as well, shouldn't it?
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Daan Hoogland
may be different sources of marvin, one in installed path and one about to be
installed. So, pip install --upgrade should have worked, but uninstall and
install is equally good.
Santhosh
From: Daan Hoogland [daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August
Daan,
In Japan, already some of press has announced 4.4 release and already some of
users tried this version so I think we should be keep expose 4.4 on site.
And if issues only depend on systemvm, It should be add note about links for
fixed systemvm template and explain workaround to avoid this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24182/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7223
hey all,
I’ve managed to get the simulator build running again to jenkins.b.o. Its
running as a single job called simulator-singlerun and builds, runs and tests
cloudstack using the simulator. I’ve configured the job to trigger when the
regular master build has completed to help the devs see
On 01-Aug-2014, at 3:51 pm, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
hey all,
I’ve managed to get the simulator build running again to jenkins.b.o. Its
running as a single job called simulator-singlerun and builds, runs and tests
cloudstack using the simulator. I’ve configured the job to
+1
On CI, I think it should run on any branch that wants to maintain quality.
So master, develop, releases, hotfixes, and support. It would be awesome if
I could elect to have my random other branches run CI as well, but my guess
is that we would need more hardware to pull that off. Hopefully
On Aug 1, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Nate Gordon nate.gor...@appcore.com wrote:
+1
On CI, I think it should run on any branch that wants to maintain quality.
So master, develop, releases, hotfixes, and support. It would be awesome if
I could elect to have my random other branches run CI as well,
Will,
you might want to try:
https://github.com/imduffy15/GSoC-2014
I find it more reliable and transparent than devcloud.
On Jul 31, 2014, at 2:06 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
I am trying to use devcloud to deploy my xenserver (I do this all the
time). I am getting this
On Jul 31, 2014, at 5:11 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Hey Will,
Unfortunately no, I didn't take any special steps to get around the issue.
I cleaned everything up, tried again and it worked.
Sorry I can't be of more help here.
you guys should start looking
On Aug 1, 2014, at 4:56 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H,
In the last couple of days a lot of problems with 4.4.0 have been
reported. Workarounds, if at all available, are hard and require
intimate sysadmin experience. It seems to me we didn't deliver the
quality we want
This is pretty important….anyone out there
On Jul 31, 2014, at 5:33 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
+ Abhi
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 12:14 PM
To: dev
Subject: [ACS44]
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 1, 2014, at 4:56 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H,
In the last couple of days a lot of problems with 4.4.0 have been
reported. Workarounds, if at all available, are hard and require
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24184/
---
Review request for cloudstack and edison su.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-1389
I’ve added config in developer/developer-prefill.sql to have three new config
params commonly used by devs and to speed up account cleanup (60s now).
137655d4e11cb490391d0f4982c52262bbb7427c master
a68d8986829c462d655bf59a0cbcc0d4e8b1cc3e 4.4
Regards.
On 01-Aug-2014, at 7:27 am, Santhosh
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/23/
--
[...truncated 7220 lines...]
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @
cloud-developer ---
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run (default) @ cloud-developer
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24184/#review49343
---
Thanks Eric for picking this up, looks good but need to test.
-
On July 29, 2014, 10:20 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
Looks fine, we still need to test it before we land it on master. I
unfortunately don't have my hardware (and some parts) setup will try with
DevCloud or hope someone else would review, test and ship it :)
Ilia Shakitko wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24182/#review49340
---
test/integration/smoke/test_ssvm.py
Thanks - Seif (my GSoC student) uses it.
I typically build up an entire cloud with a script of my own (adding
primary storage that's based on a SolidFire SAN and related Compute and
Disk Offerings).
On Friday, August 1, 2014, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 31, 2014, at 5:11
On May 24, 2014, 7:29 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
Thanks for the patch, the variables are subjective and would need testing
before merging. Looks good.
daan Hoogland wrote:
Joris, correct me if I am wrong: We are using these in our environments
at the moment.
Joris van Lieshout
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24184/#review49346
---
Ship it!
Thanks for the fix!
commit
On Aug. 1, 2014, 3:07 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
Thanks Eric for picking this up, looks good but need to test.
Sorry, didn't see your review before i committed mine. Anyway it works for me.
- Hugo
---
This is an automatically
Thanks Hugo for setting it up.
On 01-Aug-2014, at 7:21 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
hey all,
I’ve managed to get the simulator build running again to jenkins.b.o. Its
running as a single job called simulator-singlerun and builds, runs and tests
cloudstack using the
Thanks Seb. That is very similar to the setup that I use, but I am using
snapshots on VMware Fusion as my foundation. I will look into building up
a new env with this.
Thx,
Will
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J
Thanks, I will give it a shot...
ws
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
Will,
you might want to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24185/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7224
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 7:42 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] git workflow
On Aug 1, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Nate Gordon nate.gor...@appcore.com
wrote:
+1
On CI, I think it
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/24/changes
Changes:
[Rohit Yadav] developer: add commonly used glboal config in
developer-prefill.sql
--
[...truncated 7244 lines...]
log4j:WARN See
If you run into any issues give me a shout will :-)
On 1 Aug 2014 17:13, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
Thanks, I will give it a shot...
ws
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|*
thanks Ian. :)
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
If you run into any issues give me a shout will :-)
On 1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24185/#review49353
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On Aug. 1, 2014, 4:23
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24185/#review49354
---
Commit 93c64cd7f210f4a11b1e8b71f8cf7edcc8eb in cloudstack's
On Aug. 1, 2014, 5:57 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
plugins/network-elements/brocade-vcs/src/com/cloud/network/brocade/BrocadeVcsApi.java,
line 547
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24111/diff/2/?file=646948#file646948line547
It seems there is no corresponding catch here, did
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/25/changes
Hey All,
I figure I should just start a thread for this because it is worth its own
discussion.
I have been building, developing and testing CS code for quite some time
now. I have a bit of a system down now, but it is still a battle every
time. I know that a lot of you probably have your own
I had issues getting advanced networking to work. I also had issues with
the VT pass through on Xen on VirtualBox
Virtualbox is a no go for VT.
However, with xenserver this isn't an issue (Open to correction here). We
can run 32bit VMs nested without issue, we can run VMs in PV mode without
Thanks for the details. Yes, I am setting up environment right now, so I
will see how it goes. I just realized that your setup basically requires
all the same commands as what I use for devcloud, but we just point to your
json file instead of the devcloud json file.
*Correction*: I was wrong
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24182/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2014, 7:13 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh
I think we should, it is based on our custom templates anyway so it does
work in some situations. Let's see what it does.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21696/
Hi, I am implementing features on the master branch of the management server,
hence I need to run the latest master cloudstack agent via eclipse as well
(since currently only cloudstack-agent 4.3 is available via apt-get).
How do I run it? 'mvn -pl :cloud-agent jetty:run’?
Thanks,
KC
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Kuang-Ching Wang kuangching.w...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi, I am implementing features on the master branch of the management
server, hence I need to run the latest master cloudstack agent via eclipse
as well (since currently only cloudstack-agent 4.3 is available
sounds cool!
no chance we could have something fast and simple to put in place like a
global or region setting for the name of the latest systemvm template?
Thanks,
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/28/changes
Changes:
[sudison] CLOUDSTACK-7226: in case lun number is not provided,
addprimarystorage cmd should report error instead of NPE
--
[...truncated 2579 lines...]
[INFO]
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/1295/changes
Changes:
[sudison] CLOUDSTACK-7226: in case lun number is not provided,
addprimarystorage cmd should report error instead of NPE
--
[...truncated 1977 lines...]
[INFO] ---
Thanks, that’s really helpful! I got them up and running.
In case others are interested in doing this, what I did was the following, on
each compute host:
wget
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/1296/changes
Changes:
[sudison] remove unused servlet
--
[...truncated 1977 lines...]
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @
cloud-engine-network ---
[INFO] Surefire report
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/29/changes
Changes:
[sudison] remove unused servlet
--
[...truncated 2579 lines...]
[INFO]
[INFO]
apparently Global settings for VR already exist !
router.template.xen
router.template.kvm
router.template.vmware
Sheng, I hope you will have some time to spend on your idea to use package
repo :-)
Thanks,
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t
78 matches
Mail list logo
