GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53
Merge 4.5 to master
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/karuturi/cloudstack merge-45-to-master-2
Alternatively you can review
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/10#issuecomment-66041100
Hi Tim,
IMO, the fixes are in main methods of those classes, so do they even affect
CloudStack mgmt server, I'm not sure?
Both the PRs cannot be
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53#issuecomment-66041167
Thanks Rajani for the PR, let's merge as soon as Travis passes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/52
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/47#issuecomment-66041997
Thanks Rajani, go for it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20078/
---
(Updated déc. 8, 2014, 9:31 matin)
Review request for cloudstack, Anshul
On déc. 5, 2014, 5:57 après-midi, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Interesting feature, can you fix and send one that applies cleanly on
master? Thanks.
done
- Axel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
Hi Rohit,
Here are a few issues (without resolution). Maybe you can help get a fix in
time for 4.3.2 release:
Snapshosts errors after upgrade 4.1.1 to 4.3.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8013
Failed to create a volume from snapshot:
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53#issuecomment-66043331
sure Rohit.. waiting for travis to finish.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
On Dec. 5, 2014, 5:57 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
Interesting feature, can you fix and send one that applies cleanly on
master? Thanks.
Axel Delahaye wrote:
done
Hi Axel - on latest master, I'm unable to apply it using git am patch. It
fails. I will be able to merge your
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53#issuecomment-66044338
Hi folks, any chance to try those merges with the noawsapi branch ? I am
working on IP clearance for ec2stack and gstack and once we get that under the
project, I
On déc. 5, 2014, 5:57 après-midi, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Interesting feature, can you fix and send one that applies cleanly on
master? Thanks.
Axel Delahaye wrote:
done
Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi Axel - on latest master, I'm unable to apply it using git am patch.
It fails. I will
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20078/
---
(Updated déc. 8, 2014, 10:30 matin)
Review request for cloudstack, Anshul
On déc. 5, 2014, 5:57 après-midi, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Interesting feature, can you fix and send one that applies cleanly on
master? Thanks.
Axel Delahaye wrote:
done
Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi Axel - on latest master, I'm unable to apply it using git am patch.
It fails. I will
Hi guys,
still wondering is there any interest into imlementing the VM snapshoot for
KVM ?
We desperately need it, so will try to contribute anyway we can (not me
obviosuly, not a developer, but my colegues will).
Can you give some guidance on this subject - I'm aware of the design
documents
CS does not support memory snapshots for XenServer. Disk snapshots are working.
Not sure about VmWare, but I guess it should be the same. I thought the
reachest feature-set is developed for KVM. But if it does not support memory
snapshots - I wonder wich hypervisor does it ? This option at user
With KVM - I understand that there are 2 steps in general. 1) libvirts save
- which saves memory of running VM to a file 2) qemu-img to snapshot
disks...
AS for the KVM VM snapshoting - my understanding is that the code is not
implemented at all, right ?
On 8 December 2014 at 12:11, Vadim
I spoke to the contrail guys at openstack summit last month. It seems
they have dropped their support for ACS.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53#issuecomment-66103841
sure @runseb. I can help with that.
rebase master on noawsapi branch would required a force push.
This is what I think we can do here is
1. create a new
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/47#issuecomment-66104188
missed adding a link to the pr in commit message
4.3: 7d17e95991035beeb802483a4b3d98df0dc9c8e8
4.4: c8882b39ec6ba84355a70c2f59f01a422e906b31
4.5 and
As far as I know, KVM does support memory snapshot.
The shortcoming is libvirt-java supports only internal snapshot (not
external snapshots) for now.
In this case, the memory snapshot will be attached to the qcow2 file, and
the qcow2 will grow even after we remove the memory snapshot.
I've
Pierre-Luc,
I see you mentioned an upgrade to java 1.7 as new in 4.5. 4.4 is java
1.7 as well.
--
Daan
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
wrote:
CS does not support memory snapshots for XenServer. Disk snapshots are
working. Not sure about VmWare, but I guess it should be the same. I
thought the reachest feature-set is developed for KVM. But if it does
Hm... I see that in XS 6.0.2 it was impossible to do memory snapshot unless
you had a licenced XS ? Is this still the case with XS 6.2 ?
On 8 December 2014 at 12:43, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk
vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
wrote:
Anybody interested ?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7926
Best
--
Andrija Panić
Not that I know. I take VM snaphots all the time, and don't have XS
licenses.
--
Erik
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hm... I see that in XS 6.0.2 it was impossible to do memory snapshot unless
you had a licenced XS ? Is this still the case with
Andrija,
No, 6.2 went fully free, no more restrictions. You can do disk and/or memory
snapshots as much as you want, ACS supports it.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
To:
Hi,
I'm getting more and more requests from customers to have mini clouds
installed, but also DR capability.
This would be a great occasion to introduce them to Cloudstack, except for the
DR bit for which I have found no straightforward way of performing. I'd have to
replicate a whole lot of
Hi,
I think if you make nfs as primary storage backend on brtfs or zfs (freenas?)
you could take a snapshot and send all to DR site. Also, a plan of increment
snapshot.
This may be good method.
Best Regards,
Star Guo
-邮件原件-
发件人: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
发送时间: 2014年12月8日 20:34
Thanks, but that is not my main problem. My difficulties are more like:
- how do I dump metadata for cloudstack KVM guests that are not running? virsh
dumpxml will not work as the guests that are not running are not defined at all
in libvirt (ie this will not list them: virsh list --all)
- how
Hi Daan,
Yes, 1.7 java upgrade is from the RN of 4.4, I'll remove 4.5 RN from RTD
since it's not completed yet.
Sorry about that.
PL
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Pierre-Luc,
I see you mentioned an upgrade to java 1.7 as new in 4.5. 4.4 is
H, I investigated an issue some colleagues noticed and it turns out
that in the update procedure the flag
VirtualNetworkApplianceService.MinVRVersion is not set for versions
4.4.0-4.4.2
I have no workaround other then rebooting the routers instead of
upgading/updating them. I will patch the
This should probably happen in 4.5 branch as well I guess?
--
Erik
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
H, I investigated an issue some colleagues noticed and it turns out
that in the update procedure the flag
I am looking if the value 4.4.1 is applicable there or whether it
should be higher, as we mail. will update you all.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
This should probably happen in 4.5 branch as well I guess?
--
Erik
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Daan
In 4.3 it's defined as _minVRVersion. For each major ACS version such as ACS
4.4.x, this value should be 4.4.0 unless we want to use higher templates such
as 4.4.1 or 4.4.2.
For 4.5, it should be 4.5.0. This is assuming that ACS templates are compatible
with future bugfix releases and we don't
Whei Zou, shouldn't this be in the systemvm64template dir mostly. I
think the 32bit one is no longer supported, really.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:29 PM, weiz...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: cloudstack
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master f73ad2e8b - ca5c800f8
Fix CloudStack version
Rohit, in 4.4 there was a problem with the templates in 4.4.0 so it
must be 4.4.1. I don't see the underscore but a capital M in
MinVRVersion in 4.4!
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
In 4.3 it's defined as _minVRVersion. For each major ACS version such
I see some changes that make me want to put 4.5.0 in there for the 4.5
branch. proceding
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I don't think we need to let users go through a sysvm upgrade
procedure if it is not needed.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:34
few question about 4.5;
- which systemvm should we use? jenkins job build-systemvm-4.5 is a month
old.
- upgrade path seams damaged, previous bug CLOUDSTACK-8041 is
false, although I've never succeed to upgrade a system so far.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion
We need to get my fix '[MERGE REQUEST] hotfix/4.5-7959'merged in to get the
system vms building again. The building is currently broken because of a
compatibility issues.
This merge should be made asap...
Cheers,
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy
I think if all the cloudstack network is behind a firewall ( a device setting
DNAT+SNAT ) it may be easy to achieve the goal of DR.
Make all CS management (mysql) as a KVM instance which start with virsh, and
backend btrfs, and make primary storage and secondary storage backend of other
Daan,
system64template dir does not exist in master branch. It is strange.
I saw many commits on systemvmtemplate, but not on system64template.
Maybe we need to fix it.
-Wei
2014-12-08 15:32 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com:
Whei Zou, shouldn't this be in the
Ok, It might be someone deleted the 32bit dir and renamed the 64bit
dir. Makes sense if we no longer support 32bit. I have not been
spending enough time in the newer branches lately:(
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Daan,
system64template dir does not
Yeah, that's what I meant by not straighforward. :-)
I'll stick with my libvirt/KVM setups for now.
Cheers
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Star Guo st...@ceph.me
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 8
I just checked it.
That is because Leo Simons made the changes for CLOUDSTACK-7143.
Nice!
2014-12-08 16:01 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com:
Ok, It might be someone deleted the 32bit dir and renamed the 64bit
dir. Makes sense if we no longer support 32bit. I have not been
lgtm,
do i look for a pull request, or just merge?
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
We need to get my fix '[MERGE REQUEST] hotfix/4.5-7959'merged in to get the
system vms building again. The building is currently broken because of a
compatibility
I am not hosting a public repo with the fix. I think a merge is the
simplest way. A pull request is great for non-committers to contribute,
but I think it is a bit disjointed for committers who already have access
to create fix branches. Do you agree?
ws
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday?
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for listening to my concerns folks... and I'll be rooting for those
of you that are doing to come up with some better practices for the
community
as a pragmatic programmer, yes. In light of the work we are starting
on wednesday, no. I leave picking the answer as an excercise to the
reader;)
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
I am not hosting a public repo with the fix. I think a merge is the
Github user snuf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/9#issuecomment-66134697
Hi Rohit,
Well there are a couple of things here:
1st: I work on a fork and pull in upstream master and merge that into
ovmsupport
Fair enough. :) Just merge the branch this time and we will figure out
the details going forward. I think reducing the work for the person doing
the merge will help collaboration (even if the committer has to do a bit
more work), so I am open to how we do this...
ws
*Will STEVENS*
Lead
merged
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
as a pragmatic programmer, yes. In light of the work we are starting
on wednesday, no. I leave picking the answer as an excercise to the
reader;)
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Will Stevens
Thank you. I have kicked off a system vm build to make sure everything is
working correctly. Lots of things in the queue though, so it may take a
while.
ws
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|*
On déc. 5, 2014, 9:43 après-midi, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
Does the feature include the capability to update or change userdata once
the VM is created?
No, it is an optional textarea in the instanceWizard
- Axel
---
This is an
On déc. 5, 2014, 5:55 après-midi, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Interesting feature, can you send another patch that applies cleanly on
master? I'll add known UI contributors who may help review your patch.
I have the new diff but I can't upload it for J.F. Vincent
- Axel
I've been working through a series of issues getting Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
templates to provision correctly, and I *think* most are really doc issues,
but before I run off and update docs I wanted to confirm that I'm doing the
right thing. Here's my list of issues, and what I did to get past my
issue.
Has something happened to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/ recently?
We have not had a successful build in 3 days and the queue is growing but
there does not seem to be any build slaves in action handling the
workload. Is this an expected outage?
Cheers,
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
On Dec. 5, 2014, 5:55 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
Interesting feature, can you send another patch that applies cleanly on
master? I'll add known UI contributors who may help review your patch.
Axel Delahaye wrote:
I have the new diff but I can't upload it for J.F. Vincent
Send it
On Monday 08 December 2014 09:49 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
Has something happened to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/ recently?
We have not had a successful build in 3 days and the queue is growing but
there does not seem to be any build slaves in action handling the
workload. Is this an
I think you need to take VOLUME snapshots for them to be stored on the SS.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: benoit lair kurushi4...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 8 December, 2014 16:57:34
Also raised the issue a few days ago.
Hugo seemed awfully busy.
Erik
Den mandag 8. desember 2014 skrev Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
følgende:
On Monday 08 December 2014 09:49 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
Has something happened to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/ recently?
We have not
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/671/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/211/changes
GitHub user remibergsma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/54
make the VPN feature work more reliable and secure
At Schuberg Philis we wanted to use the VPN feature, but found it hard to
make it work in a reliable way. When we dove into it, we found
Heya,
Restarted Jenkins after cleaning up some space. Hopefully this will keep
Jenkins running for a couple of days.
When i have some more time i’ll try and think of a more permanent solution.
@David, would it be possible to add an extra disk to this box? A 100Gb disk
would go a long way.
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/755/changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
CVE-2014-7807: Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds
CVSS:
7.5, AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Vendors:
The Apache Software Foundation
Citrix, Inc.
Versions Afffected:
Apache CloudStack 4.3, 4.4
Description:
Apache CloudStack may be
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:50 AM, lsimons g...@git.apache.org wrote:
Github user lsimons commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/33#issuecomment-65199170
Hey folks,
Karl thanks for contributing. Looks like quite a bit of work!
Rohit thanks
It is still doing the same, I suspect that this is an intentional behavior
of qemu, it keeps the disk space for future use. However I haven't found
any documentation on how users should free the space.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know,
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/84/changes
FYI
During my regression testing of 4.5, I noticed a storage-related issue with
regards to VMware.
I had to correct it in be38b9706615d5ab0cc9959577b0fff9a36a9fc6.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
Thank you. I have kicked off a system vm build to make
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found
with Coverity Scan.
7 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan.
8 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent
build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New
Hi,
when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access
web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access
logs as remote IP.
Why is this behaviour - and can this be changed ?
My understanding is that this is kind of bug (unless needed for some other
And just to spice things a little bit, ALL remote connections appears to
come from main Public IP of the VPC VR.
So we can not block some stuff on firewall onVM (while doing port
forwading) because all connections appear to come from main Public IP of
the VPC VR.
This is terrible design/bug - can
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access
web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access
logs as remote IP.
Why is this behaviour - and can this be
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
And just to spice things a little bit, ALL remote connections appears to
come from main Public IP of the VPC VR.
So we can not block some stuff on firewall onVM (while doing port
forwading) because all connections
Hi Erik - yes I know of shared network - been using that, but want to move
behind VPC to organize stuff a little bit more... ok, for loadbalancing -
did not check, as that is not my problem at the moment.
But port forwarding really is - this is really bad implemenation or bug in
my opinion, never
It sounds like some iptables rules got broken at some point for the static
NAT, and since there's still a catch-all SNAT for outbound it gets caught
by that and still keeps working, but is broken in a subtle way that goes
unnoticed.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Andrija Panic
Or wait, you're not using static NAT, you're just using port forwarding,
correct? Everything will be NAT'ed outbound to the VPC router's public IP
per SNAT, like one would expect behind a NAT. You could force outbound to
match the IP that the port forwarder is on, but what if you have multiple
IPs
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
On Dec 8, 2014, at 8:10 AM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been working through a series of issues getting Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
templates to provision correctly, and I *think* most are really doc issues,
but before I run off and update docs I wanted to confirm that I'm doing the
Hi,
I was wondering, I changed code related to copying a template down to
primary storage from secondary storage. This code - related to ESXi - gets
run in the SSVM.
Is it sufficient if I rebuild the codebase using the systemvm profile,
destroy my SSVM, and allow a new one to be created? Does
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: 09 December 2014 05:41
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [Question] System VM
Hi,
I was wondering, I changed code related to copying a template down to primary
storage from secondary
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Thanks, Sateesh!
On Monday, December 8, 2014, Sateesh Chodapuneedi
sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com javascript:;
]
Sent: 09 December 2014 05:41
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:;
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
4.5 is merged to master as of
commit 701199fca726c68b4fc09ec8939b4822e527e8c7
I hope few more would try merging, now that the conflicts are resolved.
~Rajani
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
last attempt was a failure with travis failures before and
This looks like recurring problem we are going to face again in the future
version. Especially given that its so deep in a java file, its very easy to
slip it for a release.
Can we use the max version of a 'completed' step from the version table?
Or make this configurable and update it in the
I kind of doubt that the new systemvm.iso will be propagated to the sec.
storage. You can always follow the process in the wiki [1] to propagate
the new iso which will contain your code change.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SystemVm.iso#SystemV
m.iso-VMWare
Thanks,
Have we ever decided what to do when people check code into, say, 4.5 and
it is not supposed to go into master?
Merging everything from 4.5 to master is not always desired.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
4.5 is merged to master as of
commit
Thanks, Nitin!
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
I kind of doubt that the new systemvm.iso will be propagated to the sec.
storage. You can always follow the process in the wiki [1] to propagate
the new iso which will contain your code change.
[1]
Hello,
When I create a snapshot, from say, template registered through an account,
then
1) How can I know the snapshot size on secondary storage? (API
listSnapshots does not specify the snapshot size)
2) How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage used by the account?
Currently I can see
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28836/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs:
I'm not exactly sure how this number is calculated, but - if you are using
XenServer - remember that after the first snapshot for a volume, each
subsequent snapshot is only the blocks that have changed since the prior
snapshot (this might even be true for ESX these days with CloudStack).
That
if you do an empty merge with that commit (-s ours), it would take care of
it and will not come back in the next merges.
~Rajani
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Have we ever decided what to do when people check code into, say, 4.5 and
it
So, in this case, the process would be to check the code into 4.5 and then
do an empty merge to master? Is that correct?
Thanks
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
if you do an empty merge with that commit (-s ours), it would take care of
it and will not
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
