Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/19
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/19#issuecomment-66961199
I did, lets hope I did it right :-)
@runseb or @pdion891 (or anyone else): do you think this should be applied
to 4.4/4.3 branches as well?
---
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/1417/
--
[...truncated 1088 lines...]
Running com.cloud.agent.dao.impl.PropertiesStorageTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.205 sec
Results :
Tests run: 4,
Thanks everyone :-)
--
Erik
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Erik!
-Jayapal
On 15-Dec-2014, at 11:15 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri
srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Erik!
~Talluri
On 15/12/14
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/19#issuecomment-66966195
looks good on the
docs.http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/qig.html
It's valid for 4.3 and 4.3 so go for it.
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/21#issuecomment-66966586
Hi Radhika, this is a pr to master, but your pr# 22 for updating the
service offering is for 4.4. Where should this go in ? 4.4, 4.5 and master
â¦or just
Hi All,
I've created a CloudStack 4.3.2 release, with the following artifacts up
for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SHA:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
Commit: a15acb8e74d52bdd973f613c19dc3afd42771be4
List of changes:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29046/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs:
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/19#issuecomment-66980759
@hannibal20 Thank you for your contribution, your patch has been merged to
all branches
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/121/changes
Changes:
[jayapal] CLOUDSTACK-8072: Fixed NPE in deleting default ACL items in default
ACL
--
[...truncated 1484 lines...]
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53#issuecomment-66985696
I will need to look into it. If we don't want to do a force push, then
maybe we can wait to do this new -2 branchâ¦because we would need to do it
again and
Dear all,
We are using CloudStack 4.2.0 with KVM hypervisors.
Is there a way to prevent our virtual routers (VRs) to be targeted by DNS
amplification attack? It seems that the DNS services on dnsmasq running on
the VRs are by default recursive, causing it to easily be targeted for DNS
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Indra, did you observe this on Shared Network - I had same issue with
Shared Network (public IPs) in Advanced Zone.
I think VR for VPC is NOT a problem...
On 15 December 2014 at 13:13, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote:
Dear all,
We are using CloudStack 4.2.0 with KVM hypervisors.
Is
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found
with Coverity Scan.
5 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan.
2 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent
build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New
Please refer the following ticket, It will help
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5494
Thanks,
jayapal
On 15-Dec-2014, at 5:52 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Indra, did you observe this on Shared Network - I had same issue with
Shared Network (public IPs) in
Please look at the comments for CLOUDSTACK-5494 and CLOUDSTACK-6432 on JIRA.
Maybe it helps.
-Wei
2014-12-15 13:13 GMT+01:00 Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id:
Dear all,
We are using CloudStack 4.2.0 with KVM hypervisors.
Is there a way to prevent our virtual routers (VRs) to be targeted by DNS
Hi Andrija,
Yes, it's on a shared network with public IP in advanced zone. So far I
don't see similar issues on my VPC's VRs, but it could be because the IP is
not known, unlike the VR on a shared network which will automatically use
the second IP on the subnet after the gateway (e.g. x.x.x.2).
you got response with BUGs on jira and temp fix is there...
so, yes
On 15 December 2014 at 13:49, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote:
Hi Andrija,
Yes, it's on a shared network with public IP in advanced zone. So far I
don't see similar issues on my VPC's VRs, but it could be because the IP
H fellow devs,
We got a bad report here: 5 new, 2 fixed.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:08 PM, scan-ad...@coverity.com wrote:
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found
with Coverity Scan.
5 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Thanks MatthewI set vm state in vm_instance table to Expunging and run expunge
command from UI successfully.
I notice that I changed state of active snapshots of this instace from
vm_snapshots table to Expunging and fill removed field.
From: Matthew Midgett
Just an FYI that I'll have to abstain from voting on this one as I'm still
in the process of testing the current 4.5.0 RC.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a CloudStack 4.3.2 release, with the following artifacts up
for a vote:
GitHub user remibergsma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/58
use directIO flags when dd'ing template
This makes sure dom0 in xenserver doesn't get hammered
when copying templates. It doesn't make sense to use
the cache of dom0 as the template
Great news - congratulations Erik
Kind Regards
Giles
D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055
giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pdion...@apache.org]
Sent: 13 December 2014 17:04
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New
Github user radhikapc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/21#issuecomment-67034172
This document should go into Master and 4.5.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Currently in the UI and API it can be difficult to tell what exactly a
particular firewall rule is being used for. I know that it is currently
possible to add tags to firewall rules, but that seems suboptimal from an
ease-of-use standpoint.
Would it be feasible to add a comment or description
Happy holidays everyone. I will be offline from 12/18 - 12/28.
Thanks
Animesh
Dec 2018 to Dec 2028? :-D
Happy xmas new year
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 15 December, 2014 23:07:38
Subject:
HaHa, make fun of the American, and this when he tries to give us
useful date formats (high significance first).
Have a good time of Animesh,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Dec 2018 to Dec 2028? :-D
Happy xmas new year
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using
LOL!
Enjoy, all !
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
HaHa, make fun of the American, and this when he tries to give us
useful date formats (high significance first).
Have a good time of Animesh,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Nux!
Kudos Rohit for the package repo in RC!
I'll test the upgrade path to 4.5 from it and perform some tests against
4.3.2rc
PL
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Just an FYI that I'll have to abstain from voting on this one as I'm still
in the
I wish I could take that much time off.
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 4:07 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [OFFLINE] Animesh offline from 12/18 - 12/28
Dec 2018 to Dec 2028? :-D
Happy xmas new year
--
+1
When there are large set of rules, It will be useful.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 16-Dec-2014, at 4:17 AM, Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com wrote:
Currently in the UI and API it can be difficult to tell what exactly a
particular firewall rule is being used for. I know that it is currently
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29087/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Mike Tutkowski and Min Chen.
Repository:
Hi,
I just upload a patch which implements the root -resize feature within
xenserver 6.2.0.
Hopes can help.
---
Thanks,
Yitao(依涛 姜)
jiangyt.github.io
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Matthew Midgett
clouds...@trick-solutions.com.invalid wrote:
Root disk resize during deployment is a huge
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28748/
---
(Updated Dec. 16, 2014, 11:41 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and
38 matches
Mail list logo
